Delta Immature Platelet Fraction Is Associated With Mortality in Bacteremia Patients.

Pei-Chun Shih, Yi-Hua Wang, Shey-Ying Chen, Min Tseng, Cheng-An Hsu, Ming-Yan Yang, Hsin-Yao Wang, Jia-Arng Lee
{"title":"Delta Immature Platelet Fraction Is Associated With Mortality in Bacteremia Patients.","authors":"Pei-Chun Shih, Yi-Hua Wang, Shey-Ying Chen, Min Tseng, Cheng-An Hsu, Ming-Yan Yang, Hsin-Yao Wang, Jia-Arng Lee","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Immature platelet fraction (IPF) for differentiating bacteremia has been explored, whereas its prognostic correlation remains uncertain. This study aims to confirm the predictive capability of IPF for bacteremia and investigate its association with prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with complete blood count (CBC) on the blood culture day (D1) and the preceding day (D0) were retrospectively recruited and categorized into bacteremia and nonbacteremia groups. Immature platelet (IP) analysis, alongside CBC, was conducted. Delta IPF, defined by the absolute values of D1 minus D0 results was calculated. The ability to distinguish bacteremia from nonbacteremia patients, and the correlation with mortality were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From February to December 2020, a total of 150 patients were enrolled, with 75 having bacteremia. The specificity for delta IPF ≥3.4% to predict bacteremia was 97.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 90.7-99.7). When delta IPF ≥3.4% combined with procalcitonin ≥0.5 (ng/mL), the sensitivity was 90.5% (95% CI: 69.6%-98.8%). Within the bacteremia group, delta IPF and the proportion of patients with delta IPF ≥1.5% were significantly higher in nonsurvival, while delta platelet levels did not. Furthermore, delta IPF ≥1.5% was independently associated with 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 3.88, 95% CI: 1.2%-11.4%; p = 0.020). The 30-day survival curve demonstrated a significant difference between patients with delta IPF ≥1.5% and those without (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Delta IPF correlates with mortality in bacteremia patients. Our findings suggest IPF not only helps detect bacteremia but also predicts prognosis in the early stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":94050,"journal":{"name":"International journal of laboratory hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of laboratory hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.14365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Immature platelet fraction (IPF) for differentiating bacteremia has been explored, whereas its prognostic correlation remains uncertain. This study aims to confirm the predictive capability of IPF for bacteremia and investigate its association with prognosis.

Methods: Patients with complete blood count (CBC) on the blood culture day (D1) and the preceding day (D0) were retrospectively recruited and categorized into bacteremia and nonbacteremia groups. Immature platelet (IP) analysis, alongside CBC, was conducted. Delta IPF, defined by the absolute values of D1 minus D0 results was calculated. The ability to distinguish bacteremia from nonbacteremia patients, and the correlation with mortality were analyzed.

Results: From February to December 2020, a total of 150 patients were enrolled, with 75 having bacteremia. The specificity for delta IPF ≥3.4% to predict bacteremia was 97.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 90.7-99.7). When delta IPF ≥3.4% combined with procalcitonin ≥0.5 (ng/mL), the sensitivity was 90.5% (95% CI: 69.6%-98.8%). Within the bacteremia group, delta IPF and the proportion of patients with delta IPF ≥1.5% were significantly higher in nonsurvival, while delta platelet levels did not. Furthermore, delta IPF ≥1.5% was independently associated with 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 3.88, 95% CI: 1.2%-11.4%; p = 0.020). The 30-day survival curve demonstrated a significant difference between patients with delta IPF ≥1.5% and those without (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Delta IPF correlates with mortality in bacteremia patients. Our findings suggest IPF not only helps detect bacteremia but also predicts prognosis in the early stage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德尔塔不成熟血小板比例与菌血症患者的死亡率有关。
目的:血小板未成熟率(IPF)用于区分菌血症的方法已被探索,但其与预后的相关性仍不确定。本研究旨在证实 IPF 对菌血症的预测能力,并探讨其与预后的关系:方法:回顾性招募在血培养日(D1)和前一天(D0)进行全血细胞计数(CBC)的患者,并将其分为菌血症组和非菌血症组。在进行全血细胞计数的同时,还进行了未成熟血小板(IP)分析。根据 D1 减去 D0 结果的绝对值计算出 IPF 值。分析了区分菌血症和非菌血症患者的能力以及与死亡率的相关性:2020年2月至12月,共有150名患者入组,其中75人患有菌血症。δIPF≥3.4%预测菌血症的特异性为97.3%(95%置信区间[CI]:90.7-99.7)。当δIPF≥3.4%与降钙素原≥0.5(纳克/毫升)相结合时,灵敏度为90.5%(95% CI:69.6%-98.8%)。在菌血症组中,delta IPF 和 delta IPF≥1.5% 的患者比例在非存活患者中明显较高,而 delta 血小板水平则不高。此外,δIPF ≥1.5%与30天死亡率独立相关(调整后赔率:3.88,95% CI:1.2%-11.4%;P = 0.020)。30 天生存曲线显示,δIPF ≥1.5%的患者与未δIPF ≥1.5%的患者之间存在显著差异(p 结论:δIPF 与死亡率相关:德尔塔IPF与菌血症患者的死亡率相关。我们的研究结果表明,IPF 不仅有助于检测菌血症,还能在早期预测预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Atypical Melanocytic Cells in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of a 7-Year-Old Child With Headaches. Diagnostic Implications of CD63 and CD64 Expression Levels and FcγRIIIA 158 V/F Gene Polymorphism in Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia Adult Patients. Unicentric Castleman Disease: Updates and Novel Insights Into Spindle Cell Proliferations and Aggressive Forms of a Localized Disease. FLAER Revealed Normally Expected Non-PNH FLAER-Dim Immature Myeloid Cells (CD117+/CD34-) In Bone Marrow Aspirates and Could Be Utilized as a Marker of Hierarchical Hematopoiesis. Overview on Hereditary Spherocytosis Diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1