Bridging oral health and nutrition: Assessing produce prescription programs in pediatric dental clinics serving low-income communities.

Zachary L Houser, Elizabeth Lyden, Claire C Koukol, Courtney A Parks
{"title":"Bridging oral health and nutrition: Assessing produce prescription programs in pediatric dental clinics serving low-income communities.","authors":"Zachary L Houser, Elizabeth Lyden, Claire C Koukol, Courtney A Parks","doi":"10.1111/jphd.12642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study assesses the needs and feasibility of conducting a produce prescription (produce Rx) program in a pediatric dental clinic setting serving low-income patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional quantitative survey examining several household characteristics including demographics, benefits received, fruit and vegetable intake patterns, food security, feasibility of a produce Rx program, and respondents' answers to questions based on social cognitive theory constructs. The survey was administered at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) pediatric dental clinic, a pediatric dental residency clinical training site. One hundred adult respondents with low income completed a 36-item questionnaire during their child's dental appointment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost half of respondents reported experiencing food insecurity (45%). Respondents who were food insecure experienced higher levels of nutrition insecurity (p = 0.012), less confidence in choosing fruits and vegetables (FVs) (p = 0.026), difficulty in purchasing FVs in their neighborhood (p = 0.012), and more concern that FVs cost too much (p < 0.001) when compared to respondents who were food secure. Notwithstanding the barriers they face, almost all respondents reported that they eat FVs because of health benefits (95%) and to set a good example for their family (91%). Additionally, most respondents expressed an interest in produce Rx programs (80%) and nutrition education activities (81%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated the potential for produce Rx program uptake in a pediatric dental clinic setting through positive caregiver-reported need and interest. Future studies should explore how produce Rx programs can be adapted most effectively in this novel setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":94108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jphd.12642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study assesses the needs and feasibility of conducting a produce prescription (produce Rx) program in a pediatric dental clinic setting serving low-income patients.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional quantitative survey examining several household characteristics including demographics, benefits received, fruit and vegetable intake patterns, food security, feasibility of a produce Rx program, and respondents' answers to questions based on social cognitive theory constructs. The survey was administered at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) pediatric dental clinic, a pediatric dental residency clinical training site. One hundred adult respondents with low income completed a 36-item questionnaire during their child's dental appointment.

Results: Almost half of respondents reported experiencing food insecurity (45%). Respondents who were food insecure experienced higher levels of nutrition insecurity (p = 0.012), less confidence in choosing fruits and vegetables (FVs) (p = 0.026), difficulty in purchasing FVs in their neighborhood (p = 0.012), and more concern that FVs cost too much (p < 0.001) when compared to respondents who were food secure. Notwithstanding the barriers they face, almost all respondents reported that they eat FVs because of health benefits (95%) and to set a good example for their family (91%). Additionally, most respondents expressed an interest in produce Rx programs (80%) and nutrition education activities (81%).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the potential for produce Rx program uptake in a pediatric dental clinic setting through positive caregiver-reported need and interest. Future studies should explore how produce Rx programs can be adapted most effectively in this novel setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连接口腔健康与营养:评估为低收入社区服务的儿科牙科诊所的产品处方计划。
目的:本研究评估了在为低收入患者服务的儿科牙科诊所开展农产品处方计划的需求和可行性:本研究评估了在为低收入患者服务的儿科牙科诊所开展农产品处方(produce Rx)计划的需求和可行性:我们进行了一项横断面定量调查,考察了一些家庭特征,包括人口统计学、所获福利、水果和蔬菜摄入模式、食品安全、农产品处方计划的可行性,以及受访者对基于社会认知理论构建的问题的回答。调查在内布拉斯加大学医学中心(UNMC)儿科牙科诊所进行,该诊所是儿科牙科住院医师临床培训基地。100 名低收入成人受访者在其子女看牙期间完成了 36 个项目的问卷调查:近一半的受访者(45%)表示曾有过食物不安全的经历。食物无保障的受访者营养无保障程度较高(p = 0.012),对选择水果和蔬菜(FVs)的信心较低(p = 0.026),在其所在社区难以购买到水果和蔬菜(p = 0.012),并且更担心水果和蔬菜价格过高(p 结论:这项研究表明,"农产品营养支持系统 "具有潜力:本研究通过护理人员对需求和兴趣的积极反馈,证明了在儿科牙科诊所环境中使用处方药的潜力。未来的研究应探讨如何在这种新颖的环境中最有效地调整配方药物计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Starch intake and changes in dental caries among adults: A longitudinal study in Finland. The effect of water filter pitchers on the mineral concentration of tap water. Dietary questions in caries risk assessment and their relationship to caries. The relationships between unmet social needs, oral health measures, and dental service utilization in a pediatric population. Rising trend of dentist-prescribed antibiotics in Brazil: 2011-2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1