Treatment options for tumor progression after initial immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world study

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Neoplasia Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.neo.2024.101043
Ying Li , Junfeng Zhao , Ruyue Li , Xiujing Yao , Xue Dong , Ruidan Zhang , Yintao Li
{"title":"Treatment options for tumor progression after initial immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world study","authors":"Ying Li ,&nbsp;Junfeng Zhao ,&nbsp;Ruyue Li ,&nbsp;Xiujing Yao ,&nbsp;Xue Dong ,&nbsp;Ruidan Zhang ,&nbsp;Yintao Li","doi":"10.1016/j.neo.2024.101043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Whether to continue administering immunotherapy to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have experienced tumor progression remains controversial after immunotherapy. The aims were to explore survival outcomes after further immunotherapy post-progression and to determine the optimal combination therapy in such cases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Overall, 507 patients with NSCLC who underwent immunotherapy and experienced tumor progression were retrospectively divided into Immuno-combination and No-immuno groups according to whether additional combination therapy involving immunotherapy was administered post-progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the different treatment regimens for patients in the Immuno-combination group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After propensity score matching, there were 150 patients in the No-immuno group and 300 patients in the Immuno combination group. Superior PFS was observed in the Immuno-combination group compared with those in the No-immuno group (6-month PFS: 25.3 % vs. 60.6 %; 12-month PFS: 6.7 % vs. 24.4 %; P &lt; 0.001). Similar intergroup differences were observed for OS (12-month OS: 22.3 % vs. 69.4 %; 18-month OS: 6.4 % vs. 40.4 %; P &lt; 0.001). Superior PFS outcomes were observed in the Immuno+Antiangiogenic group compared with the Immuno+Chemo group (6-month PFS: 51.3 % vs. 71.5 %; 12-month PFS: 23.1 % vs. 25.7 %; P = 0.017). Similar differences in OS were observed between those same subgroups (12-month OS: 62.1 % vs. 77.9 %; 18-month OS: 33.3 % vs. 48.7 %; P = 0.006).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with NSCLC experiencing tumor progression post-immunotherapy can still benefit from further treatment, with immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy the most efficacious option.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18917,"journal":{"name":"Neoplasia","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101043"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147655862400085X/pdfft?md5=cb5bb2d4a078a5df9e84a5bd503cc8ec&pid=1-s2.0-S147655862400085X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neoplasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147655862400085X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Whether to continue administering immunotherapy to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have experienced tumor progression remains controversial after immunotherapy. The aims were to explore survival outcomes after further immunotherapy post-progression and to determine the optimal combination therapy in such cases.

Methods

Overall, 507 patients with NSCLC who underwent immunotherapy and experienced tumor progression were retrospectively divided into Immuno-combination and No-immuno groups according to whether additional combination therapy involving immunotherapy was administered post-progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the different treatment regimens for patients in the Immuno-combination group.

Results

After propensity score matching, there were 150 patients in the No-immuno group and 300 patients in the Immuno combination group. Superior PFS was observed in the Immuno-combination group compared with those in the No-immuno group (6-month PFS: 25.3 % vs. 60.6 %; 12-month PFS: 6.7 % vs. 24.4 %; P < 0.001). Similar intergroup differences were observed for OS (12-month OS: 22.3 % vs. 69.4 %; 18-month OS: 6.4 % vs. 40.4 %; P < 0.001). Superior PFS outcomes were observed in the Immuno+Antiangiogenic group compared with the Immuno+Chemo group (6-month PFS: 51.3 % vs. 71.5 %; 12-month PFS: 23.1 % vs. 25.7 %; P = 0.017). Similar differences in OS were observed between those same subgroups (12-month OS: 62.1 % vs. 77.9 %; 18-month OS: 33.3 % vs. 48.7 %; P = 0.006).

Conclusion

Patients with NSCLC experiencing tumor progression post-immunotherapy can still benefit from further treatment, with immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy the most efficacious option.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期非小细胞肺癌初始免疫疗法后肿瘤进展的治疗方案:真实世界研究
目的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者在接受免疫治疗后出现肿瘤进展,是否继续接受免疫治疗仍存在争议。方法回顾性地将 507 例接受免疫治疗并出现肿瘤进展的 NSCLC 患者根据进展后是否继续接受免疫治疗分为免疫联合组和非免疫组。对无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)进行了评估。根据免疫联合组患者的不同治疗方案进行了分组分析。结果经过倾向评分匹配后,无免疫组有150名患者,免疫联合组有300名患者。与未免疫组相比,免疫组合组的 PFS 更优(6 个月 PFS:25.3% 对 60.6%;12 个月 PFS:6.7% 对 24.4%;P <;0.001)。在 OS 方面也观察到了类似的组间差异(12 个月 OS:22.3% 对 69.4%;18 个月 OS:6.4% 对 40.4%;P <;0.001)。与免疫+化疗组相比,免疫+抗血管生成组的PFS结果更好(6个月PFS:51.3% vs. 71.5%;12个月PFS:23.1% vs. 25.7%;P = 0.017)。结论免疫治疗后肿瘤进展的NSCLC患者仍可从进一步治疗中获益,免疫治疗联合抗血管生成治疗是最有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neoplasia
Neoplasia 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
82
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Neoplasia publishes the results of novel investigations in all areas of oncology research. The title Neoplasia was chosen to convey the journal’s breadth, which encompasses the traditional disciplines of cancer research as well as emerging fields and interdisciplinary investigations. Neoplasia is interested in studies describing new molecular and genetic findings relating to the neoplastic phenotype and in laboratory and clinical studies demonstrating creative applications of advances in the basic sciences to risk assessment, prognostic indications, detection, diagnosis, and treatment. In addition to regular Research Reports, Neoplasia also publishes Reviews and Meeting Reports. Neoplasia is committed to ensuring a thorough, fair, and rapid review and publication schedule to further its mission of serving both the scientific and clinical communities by disseminating important data and ideas in cancer research.
期刊最新文献
Combining the RCAS/tv-a retrovirus and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing systems to generate primary mouse models of diffuse midline glioma Expression, regulation, function and clinical significance of B7-H6 on neutrophils in human gastric cancer Exosomes in review: A new frontier in CAR-T cell therapies Sialylated IgG-activated integrin β4-Src-Erk axis stabilizes c-Myc in a p300 lysine acetyltransferase-dependent manner to promote colorectal cancer liver metastasis Exogenous BMI1 expression aggravates oral squamous cell carcinomas in tongue epithelia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1