The cross-sectional area of the median nerve: An independent prognostic biomarker in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

J.J. Martínez-Payá , J. Ríos-Díaz , M.E. del Baño-Aledo , D. Hervás , J.I. Tembl-Ferrairó , T. Sevilla-Mantecón , J.F. Vázquez-Costa
{"title":"The cross-sectional area of the median nerve: An independent prognostic biomarker in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis","authors":"J.J. Martínez-Payá ,&nbsp;J. Ríos-Díaz ,&nbsp;M.E. del Baño-Aledo ,&nbsp;D. Hervás ,&nbsp;J.I. Tembl-Ferrairó ,&nbsp;T. Sevilla-Mantecón ,&nbsp;J.F. Vázquez-Costa","doi":"10.1016/j.nrleng.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Ultrasound changes in the cross-sectional area of the median nerve (CSAmn) could be of interest as biomarkers in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eighty-four ALS patients (51 men [60.7%]; mean 62.0 [SD 11.46] years old) and forty-six controls (27 men [58.7%]; mean 59.9 [SD 8.08] years old) of two different cohorts were recruited between September 2013 and February 2018. The CSAmn was measured bilaterally in each cohort, by two different examiners with two different ultrasound machines (one in each cohort). Its association with clinical variables (disease duration, muscle strength, disability, progression rate and tracheostomy-free survival) was assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The CSAmn was smaller in patients than in controls, and the study cohort did not influence its values. A mild correlation between the strength of the wrist flexor and the CSAmn was found. In the multivariable analysis, the probability of this association being true was 90%. In the cox regression, both a faster progression rate and a larger CSAmn independently predicted poor survival (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->4.29, [Cr.I95%: 2.71–6.80], <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001; and HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.14, [Cr.I95%: 1.03–1.25], <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01), after adjusting by age, body mass index, bulbar onset, and diagnostic delay.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The CSAmn is an easy to assess biomarker that seems reliable and reproducible. Our data also suggest that it could act as a progression and prognostic biomarker in ALS patients. Longitudinal studies with repeated measures are warranted to confirm its usefulness in the clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94155,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia","volume":"39 7","pages":"Pages 564-572"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S217358082400066X/pdfft?md5=538e3f37fafb0132b313683a428f23c9&pid=1-s2.0-S217358082400066X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S217358082400066X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Ultrasound changes in the cross-sectional area of the median nerve (CSAmn) could be of interest as biomarkers in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Methods

Eighty-four ALS patients (51 men [60.7%]; mean 62.0 [SD 11.46] years old) and forty-six controls (27 men [58.7%]; mean 59.9 [SD 8.08] years old) of two different cohorts were recruited between September 2013 and February 2018. The CSAmn was measured bilaterally in each cohort, by two different examiners with two different ultrasound machines (one in each cohort). Its association with clinical variables (disease duration, muscle strength, disability, progression rate and tracheostomy-free survival) was assessed.

Results

The CSAmn was smaller in patients than in controls, and the study cohort did not influence its values. A mild correlation between the strength of the wrist flexor and the CSAmn was found. In the multivariable analysis, the probability of this association being true was 90%. In the cox regression, both a faster progression rate and a larger CSAmn independently predicted poor survival (HR = 4.29, [Cr.I95%: 2.71–6.80], p < 0.001; and HR = 1.14, [Cr.I95%: 1.03–1.25], p = 0.01), after adjusting by age, body mass index, bulbar onset, and diagnostic delay.

Conclusions

The CSAmn is an easy to assess biomarker that seems reliable and reproducible. Our data also suggest that it could act as a progression and prognostic biomarker in ALS patients. Longitudinal studies with repeated measures are warranted to confirm its usefulness in the clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正中神经的横截面积:肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症的独立预后生物标志物
方法在 2013 年 9 月至 2018 年 2 月间招募了两个不同队列的八十四名 ALS 患者(51 名男性 [60.7%];平均 62.0 [SD 11.46] 岁)和四十六名对照组患者(27 名男性 [58.7%];平均 59.9 [SD 8.08] 岁)。在每个队列中,由两名不同的检查人员使用两台不同的超声波机(每个队列一台)测量双侧 CSAmn。结果患者的 CSAmn 小于对照组,研究队列对其值没有影响。腕屈肌力量与 CSAmn 之间存在轻微相关性。在多变量分析中,这种关联的真实概率为 90%。在Cox回归中,在根据年龄、体重指数、球部发病和诊断延迟进行调整后,较快的进展速度和较大的CSAmn均可独立预测较差的生存率(HR = 4.29,[Cr.I95%:2.71-6.80],p < 0.001;HR = 1.14,[Cr.I95%:1.03-1.25],p = 0.01)。我们的数据还表明,它可以作为 ALS 患者的进展和预后生物标志物。有必要进行重复测量的纵向研究,以确认其在临床实践中的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sporadic fatal insomnia: a rapidly progressive phenotype resembling progressive supranuclear palsy. Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome following adenovirus vector-based vaccines to prevent COVID-19: Epidemiology and clinical presentation in Spain. Incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Spain: a systematic review Functional outcomes of patients with NORSE and FIRES treated with immunotherapy: A systematic review Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB-E) and normative values in a representative adult population sample
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1