Evaluating an analytical prediction algorithm of positron emitter distributions in patient data for PET monitoring of carbon ion therapy: A simulation study

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR Applied Radiation and Isotopes Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.apradiso.2024.111479
Valentina Vasic , Katia Parodi , Marco Pinto
{"title":"Evaluating an analytical prediction algorithm of positron emitter distributions in patient data for PET monitoring of carbon ion therapy: A simulation study","authors":"Valentina Vasic ,&nbsp;Katia Parodi ,&nbsp;Marco Pinto","doi":"10.1016/j.apradiso.2024.111479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In vivo treatment monitoring in ion therapy is one of the key issues for improving the treatment quality assurance procedures. Range verification is one of the most relevant and yet complex task used for in vivo treatment monitoring. In carbon ion therapy, positron emission tomography is the most widely used method. This technique exploits the <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>β</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math></span>-activity of positron emitters created by nuclear interactions between the incoming beam and the irradiated tissue. Currently, high computational efforts and time-consuming Monte Carlo simulation platforms are typically used to predict positron emitter distributions. In order to avoid time-consuming simulations, an extended filtering approach was suggested to analytically predict positron emitter profiles from depth dose distributions in carbon ion therapy. The purpose of this work is to investigate such an analytical prediction model in patient anatomies of varying complexity, highlighting its potential and the need of further improvements, especially in highly heterogeneous anatomies where many air cavities are present in the beam path. The accuracy of range verification showed a mean relative error of <span><math><mrow><mo>∼</mo><mn>3</mn><mtext>%</mtext></mrow></math></span> and a deviation between the simulation and the prediction below <span><math><mrow><mn>2</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>mm</mi></mrow></math></span> for the three patient cases analysed: a brain case and two head and neck cases. Additional investigations demonstrated the region of applicability of the method for cases of patient data. The analytical method enables range verification in carbon ion therapy by replacing computing-intensive Monte Carlo simulations and thus minimize the PET monitoring burden on the clinical workflow.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8096,"journal":{"name":"Applied Radiation and Isotopes","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 111479"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Radiation and Isotopes","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969804324003075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In vivo treatment monitoring in ion therapy is one of the key issues for improving the treatment quality assurance procedures. Range verification is one of the most relevant and yet complex task used for in vivo treatment monitoring. In carbon ion therapy, positron emission tomography is the most widely used method. This technique exploits the β+-activity of positron emitters created by nuclear interactions between the incoming beam and the irradiated tissue. Currently, high computational efforts and time-consuming Monte Carlo simulation platforms are typically used to predict positron emitter distributions. In order to avoid time-consuming simulations, an extended filtering approach was suggested to analytically predict positron emitter profiles from depth dose distributions in carbon ion therapy. The purpose of this work is to investigate such an analytical prediction model in patient anatomies of varying complexity, highlighting its potential and the need of further improvements, especially in highly heterogeneous anatomies where many air cavities are present in the beam path. The accuracy of range verification showed a mean relative error of 3% and a deviation between the simulation and the prediction below 2mm for the three patient cases analysed: a brain case and two head and neck cases. Additional investigations demonstrated the region of applicability of the method for cases of patient data. The analytical method enables range verification in carbon ion therapy by replacing computing-intensive Monte Carlo simulations and thus minimize the PET monitoring burden on the clinical workflow.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估用于碳离子疗法 PET 监测的患者数据中正电子发射器分布的分析预测算法:模拟研究
离子治疗中的体内治疗监测是改进治疗质量保证程序的关键问题之一。范围验证是体内治疗监测中最相关但也最复杂的任务之一。在碳离子治疗中,正电子发射断层扫描是应用最广泛的方法。该技术利用了正电子发射体在射入光束和照射组织之间的核相互作用下产生的β+活性。目前,预测正电子发射体分布通常需要大量的计算工作和耗时的蒙特卡罗模拟平台。为了避免耗时的模拟,有人提出了一种扩展滤波方法,以分析预测碳离子疗法中深度剂量分布的正电子发射器轮廓。这项工作的目的是在不同复杂程度的患者解剖结构中研究这种分析预测模型,突出其潜力和进一步改进的必要性,特别是在高度异质的解剖结构中,因为在射束路径中存在许多气腔。范围验证的准确性显示,在分析的三个病人病例(一个脑部病例和两个头颈部病例)中,平均相对误差为 3%,模拟与预测之间的偏差低于 2 毫米。其他调查表明,该方法适用于患者数据病例。该分析方法取代了计算密集型蒙特卡洛模拟,实现了碳离子疗法的范围验证,从而最大限度地减轻了 PET 监测对临床工作流程造成的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Radiation and Isotopes
Applied Radiation and Isotopes 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
406
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: Applied Radiation and Isotopes provides a high quality medium for the publication of substantial, original and scientific and technological papers on the development and peaceful application of nuclear, radiation and radionuclide techniques in chemistry, physics, biochemistry, biology, medicine, security, engineering and in the earth, planetary and environmental sciences, all including dosimetry. Nuclear techniques are defined in the broadest sense and both experimental and theoretical papers are welcome. They include the development and use of α- and β-particles, X-rays and γ-rays, neutrons and other nuclear particles and radiations from all sources, including radionuclides, synchrotron sources, cyclotrons and reactors and from the natural environment. The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. Papers dealing with radiation processing, i.e., where radiation is used to bring about a biological, chemical or physical change in a material, should be directed to our sister journal Radiation Physics and Chemistry.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Radiometric evaluation of Ouratea miersii (Planch.) Engl. From the Municipal Natural Park of Niterói, Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest remnant Feasibility verification of deep-learning based collimator-less imaging system using a voxelated GAGG(Ce) single volume detector: A Monte Carlo simulation Novel non-thermoluminescent CaSO4:Dy dosimeters Investigating cross-section effects on HPGe detector response through computational and empirical approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1