Evaluating the dynamic effects of complex probiotics as cellulase replacements during fermentation of apple pomace

IF 5 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY International journal of food microbiology Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2024.110896
Zhiwei Wang , Haoran Tang , Yangguang Li , Lichan Tian , Bingkui Ye , Weijie Yan , Gongwei Liu , Yuxin Yang
{"title":"Evaluating the dynamic effects of complex probiotics as cellulase replacements during fermentation of apple pomace","authors":"Zhiwei Wang ,&nbsp;Haoran Tang ,&nbsp;Yangguang Li ,&nbsp;Lichan Tian ,&nbsp;Bingkui Ye ,&nbsp;Weijie Yan ,&nbsp;Gongwei Liu ,&nbsp;Yuxin Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2024.110896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Apple pomace, an abundant agricultural by-product with low utilization rates, often leads to environmental pollution if not properly managed. This study aimed to enhance the nutritional value of apple pomace by comparing the effects of solid-state fermentation using complex probiotics and cellulase preparation. Additionally, the study investigated the dynamic changes in various components throughout the fermentation process with complex probiotics. The results of single-strain solid-state fermentation tests indicated that <em>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</em> DPH, <em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</em> SC9, and <em>Bacillus subtilis</em> C9 were the optimal strains for fermenting the most effective substrate combination, comprising 73 % apple pomace and 20 % millet bran. The strains (complex probiotics) and a cellulase preparation were used for the solid-state fermentation of the apple pomace mixture for nine days, respectively. The contents of acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, hemicellulose, and insoluble dietary fiber decreased by up to 9.99 %, 9.59 %, 23.21 %, and 14.34 %, respectively. In contrast, the content of soluble dietary fiber significantly increased by up to 29.74 %. Both methods reduced cellulose crystallinity and modified the substrate's surface structure, resulting in a looser arrangement. Fermentation with complex probiotics for three or six days increased the abundance of lactic acid bacteria, which comprised &gt;87 % of the total microbial population. Concurrently, the abundance of detrimental bacteria, such as <em>Salmonella</em>, <em>Acetobacter</em>, <em>Escherichia</em>, and <em>Pantoea</em>, significantly decreased. Furthermore, fermentation with complex probiotics for six or nine days enhanced antioxidant properties, leading to a significant increase in beneficial metabolites, including amino acids, organic acids, gamma-aminobutyric acid, serotonin. In conclusion, complex probiotics can effectively substitute for cellulase preparation in the solid-state fermentation of apple pomace, with a six-day fermentation period yielding optimal results. This study provides valuable insights into enhancing the value of apple pomace in the feed industry and the effective application of agro-industrial by-products.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14095,"journal":{"name":"International journal of food microbiology","volume":"425 ","pages":"Article 110896"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of food microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168160524003404","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Apple pomace, an abundant agricultural by-product with low utilization rates, often leads to environmental pollution if not properly managed. This study aimed to enhance the nutritional value of apple pomace by comparing the effects of solid-state fermentation using complex probiotics and cellulase preparation. Additionally, the study investigated the dynamic changes in various components throughout the fermentation process with complex probiotics. The results of single-strain solid-state fermentation tests indicated that Lactiplantibacillus plantarum DPH, Saccharomyces cerevisiae SC9, and Bacillus subtilis C9 were the optimal strains for fermenting the most effective substrate combination, comprising 73 % apple pomace and 20 % millet bran. The strains (complex probiotics) and a cellulase preparation were used for the solid-state fermentation of the apple pomace mixture for nine days, respectively. The contents of acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, hemicellulose, and insoluble dietary fiber decreased by up to 9.99 %, 9.59 %, 23.21 %, and 14.34 %, respectively. In contrast, the content of soluble dietary fiber significantly increased by up to 29.74 %. Both methods reduced cellulose crystallinity and modified the substrate's surface structure, resulting in a looser arrangement. Fermentation with complex probiotics for three or six days increased the abundance of lactic acid bacteria, which comprised >87 % of the total microbial population. Concurrently, the abundance of detrimental bacteria, such as Salmonella, Acetobacter, Escherichia, and Pantoea, significantly decreased. Furthermore, fermentation with complex probiotics for six or nine days enhanced antioxidant properties, leading to a significant increase in beneficial metabolites, including amino acids, organic acids, gamma-aminobutyric acid, serotonin. In conclusion, complex probiotics can effectively substitute for cellulase preparation in the solid-state fermentation of apple pomace, with a six-day fermentation period yielding optimal results. This study provides valuable insights into enhancing the value of apple pomace in the feed industry and the effective application of agro-industrial by-products.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估复合益生菌作为纤维素酶替代物在苹果渣发酵过程中的动态效应
苹果渣是一种丰富的农副产品,但利用率较低,如果管理不当,往往会造成环境污染。本研究旨在通过比较使用复合益生菌和纤维素酶制剂进行固态发酵的效果,提高苹果渣的营养价值。此外,该研究还调查了复合益生菌在整个发酵过程中各种成分的动态变化。单菌株固态发酵试验结果表明,植物乳杆菌 DPH、酿酒酵母 SC9 和枯草芽孢杆菌 C9 是发酵最有效基质组合(73% 苹果渣和 20% 小米糠)的最佳菌株。这些菌株(复合益生菌)和纤维素酶制剂分别用于苹果渣混合物的固态发酵,为期九天。酸性洗涤纤维、中性洗涤纤维、半纤维素和不溶性膳食纤维的含量分别减少了 9.99 %、9.59 %、23.21 % 和 14.34 %。相比之下,可溶性膳食纤维的含量则大幅增加了 29.74%。这两种方法都降低了纤维素的结晶度,改变了基质的表面结构,使其排列更加松散。用复合益生菌发酵 3 天或 6 天后,乳酸菌的数量增加,占微生物总数的 87%。与此同时,沙门氏菌、醋酸菌、大肠杆菌和泛酸菌等有害细菌的数量明显减少。此外,用复合益生菌发酵六天或九天可增强抗氧化性,使氨基酸、有机酸、γ-氨基丁酸、血清素等有益代谢物明显增加。总之,复合益生菌可有效替代苹果渣固态发酵中的纤维素酶制剂,六天的发酵期可产生最佳效果。这项研究为提高苹果渣在饲料工业中的价值以及有效应用农工业副产品提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of food microbiology
International journal of food microbiology 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
322
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Food Microbiology publishes papers dealing with all aspects of food microbiology. Articles must present information that is novel, has high impact and interest, and is of high scientific quality. They should provide scientific or technological advancement in the specific field of interest of the journal and enhance its strong international reputation. Preliminary or confirmatory results as well as contributions not strictly related to food microbiology will not be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Isolation and molecular characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) from bovine and porcine carcasses in Poland during 2019-2023 and comparison with strains from years 2014-2018. Antimicrobial efficacy of carvacrol-loaded curdlan hydrogels for enhancing shelf-life in seafood packaging applications. Iron fortification modifies the microbial community structure and metabolome of a model surface-ripened cheese Effect of texturization on microbial inactivation in UV-C treated orange juice: Predictive modeling and analysis of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris physiological and morphological changes. Wine bioacidification: Fermenting Airén grape juices with Lachancea thermotolerans and Metschnikovia pulcherrima followed by sequential Saccharomyces cerevisiae inoculation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1