Continuous design and technoeconomic assessment of commercial-scale biorefinery processes for the production of succinic acid

IF 3.2 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining-Biofpr Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1002/bbb.2624
Arthur V. L. Barbosa, Márcio L. L. Paredes, Pedro H. R. Alijó, Ana C. O. Sardou, Jeiveison G. S. S. Maia, João B. V. Bastos
{"title":"Continuous design and technoeconomic assessment of commercial-scale biorefinery processes for the production of succinic acid","authors":"Arthur V. L. Barbosa,&nbsp;Márcio L. L. Paredes,&nbsp;Pedro H. R. Alijó,&nbsp;Ana C. O. Sardou,&nbsp;Jeiveison G. S. S. Maia,&nbsp;João B. V. Bastos","doi":"10.1002/bbb.2624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Succinic acid is recognized as a key component in the production of various commercially important chemical commodities. Technical-economic analysis can provide valuable insights into the feasibility of large-scale biochemical production of succinic acid. In this study, the effects of scale on the design of a biorefinery using sugarcane bagasse were evaluated using a detailed process modeling methodology. Four processes were simulated and compared, three based on patents from biosuccinic acid (bio-SA) manufacturing companies and one based on a process economic program report (PEP). This methodology allowed for the analysis of scale benefits for each technological route. A comprehensive economic evaluation was conducted by comparing the biochemical processes in terms of investment and production costs, as well as the minimum selling price (MSP) of bio-SA. Results show that the MSP of more promising process designs ranged from 3105 to 2095 $ t<sup>−1</sup>, which is compatible with the cost of petrochemical-based succinic acid. Moreover, for capacities above 90 kt year<sup>−1</sup>, the MSP remains virtually constant, and every process evaluated revealed a breakdown in the project economy of scale. A sensitivity and risk analysis was carried out to evaluate the impacts of several process parameters on the project's technoeconomic analysis, resulting in bio-SA selling price and investment costs as parameters with the highest impact on economic viability.</p>","PeriodicalId":55380,"journal":{"name":"Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining-Biofpr","volume":"18 5","pages":"1289-1305"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining-Biofpr","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bbb.2624","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Succinic acid is recognized as a key component in the production of various commercially important chemical commodities. Technical-economic analysis can provide valuable insights into the feasibility of large-scale biochemical production of succinic acid. In this study, the effects of scale on the design of a biorefinery using sugarcane bagasse were evaluated using a detailed process modeling methodology. Four processes were simulated and compared, three based on patents from biosuccinic acid (bio-SA) manufacturing companies and one based on a process economic program report (PEP). This methodology allowed for the analysis of scale benefits for each technological route. A comprehensive economic evaluation was conducted by comparing the biochemical processes in terms of investment and production costs, as well as the minimum selling price (MSP) of bio-SA. Results show that the MSP of more promising process designs ranged from 3105 to 2095 $ t−1, which is compatible with the cost of petrochemical-based succinic acid. Moreover, for capacities above 90 kt year−1, the MSP remains virtually constant, and every process evaluated revealed a breakdown in the project economy of scale. A sensitivity and risk analysis was carried out to evaluate the impacts of several process parameters on the project's technoeconomic analysis, resulting in bio-SA selling price and investment costs as parameters with the highest impact on economic viability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生产琥珀酸的商业规模生物精炼工艺的连续设计和技术经济评估
琥珀酸被认为是生产各种具有重要商业价值的化工产品的关键成分。技术经济分析可以为琥珀酸大规模生化生产的可行性提供有价值的见解。本研究采用详细的工艺建模方法,评估了规模对利用甘蔗渣设计生物精炼厂的影响。对四种工艺进行了模拟和比较,其中三种基于生物琥珀酸(bio-SA)生产公司的专利,一种基于工艺经济方案报告(PEP)。这种方法可以分析每种技术路线的规模效益。通过比较生物化学工艺的投资和生产成本,以及生物琥珀酸的最低销售价格(MSP),进行了全面的经济评估。结果表明,较有前途的工艺设计的最低售价为 3105 美元至 2095 美元 t-1,与石化基丁二酸的成本相当。此外,当产能超过 90 kt 年-1 时,MSP 几乎保持不变,而且所评估的每种工艺都显示出项目规模经济的崩溃。进行了敏感性和风险分析,以评估若干工艺参数对项目技术经济分析的影响,结果是生物琥珀酸销售价格和投资成本是对经济可行性影响最大的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining is a vital source of information on sustainable products, fuels and energy. Examining the spectrum of international scientific research and industrial development along the entire supply chain, The journal publishes a balanced mixture of peer-reviewed critical reviews, commentary, business news highlights, policy updates and patent intelligence. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining is dedicated to fostering growth in the biorenewables sector and serving its growing interdisciplinary community by providing a unique, systems-based insight into technologies in these fields as well as their industrial development.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Using rhamnolipid as a promoter to improve the production of germacrene A by Yarrowia lipolytica Trends and challenges in hydrogen production for a sustainable energy future Soil health impact of long-term sugarcane vinasse recycling Technoeconomic analysis of alternatives to improve Cuban sugarcane wax-refining technology using Superpro Designer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1