The role of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in advanced rectal cancer: a review of current evidence and outcomes.

IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Annals of Coloproctology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30 DOI:10.3393/ac.2024.00521.0074
Gyu-Seog Choi, Hye Jin Kim
{"title":"The role of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in advanced rectal cancer: a review of current evidence and outcomes.","authors":"Gyu-Seog Choi, Hye Jin Kim","doi":"10.3393/ac.2024.00521.0074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPNs) in rectal cancer significantly impact the prognosis and treatment strategies. Western practices emphasize neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), whereas Eastern approaches often rely on LPN dissection (LPND). This review examines the evolving role of LPND in the context of modern treatments, including total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), and the impact of CRT on the management of clinically suspicious LPNs. We comprehensively reviewed the key literature comparing the outcomes of LPND versus preoperative CRT for rectal cancer, focusing on recent advancements and ongoing debates. Key studies, including the JCOG0212 trial and recent multicenter trials, were analyzed to assess the efficacy of LPND, particularly in conjunction with preoperative CRT or TNT. Current evidence indicates that LPND can reduce local recurrence rates compared to total mesorectal excision alone in patients not receiving radiation therapy. However, the benefit of LPND in the context of neoadjuvant CRT is influenced by the size and pretreatment characteristics of LPNs. While CRT can effectively control smaller metastatic LPNs, larger or clinically suspicious LPNs may require LPND for optimal outcomes. Advances in surgical techniques, such as robotic-assisted LPND, offer potential benefits but also present challenges and complications. The role of TNT in controlling metastatic LPNs and improving patient outcomes is emerging but remains underexplored. The decision to perform LPND should be individualized based on patient-specific factors, including LPN size, response to neoadjuvant treatment, and surgeon expertise. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment protocols and further evaluating the role of TNT in managing metastatic LPNs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11375230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00521.0074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPNs) in rectal cancer significantly impact the prognosis and treatment strategies. Western practices emphasize neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), whereas Eastern approaches often rely on LPN dissection (LPND). This review examines the evolving role of LPND in the context of modern treatments, including total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), and the impact of CRT on the management of clinically suspicious LPNs. We comprehensively reviewed the key literature comparing the outcomes of LPND versus preoperative CRT for rectal cancer, focusing on recent advancements and ongoing debates. Key studies, including the JCOG0212 trial and recent multicenter trials, were analyzed to assess the efficacy of LPND, particularly in conjunction with preoperative CRT or TNT. Current evidence indicates that LPND can reduce local recurrence rates compared to total mesorectal excision alone in patients not receiving radiation therapy. However, the benefit of LPND in the context of neoadjuvant CRT is influenced by the size and pretreatment characteristics of LPNs. While CRT can effectively control smaller metastatic LPNs, larger or clinically suspicious LPNs may require LPND for optimal outcomes. Advances in surgical techniques, such as robotic-assisted LPND, offer potential benefits but also present challenges and complications. The role of TNT in controlling metastatic LPNs and improving patient outcomes is emerging but remains underexplored. The decision to perform LPND should be individualized based on patient-specific factors, including LPN size, response to neoadjuvant treatment, and surgeon expertise. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment protocols and further evaluating the role of TNT in managing metastatic LPNs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
盆腔侧淋巴结清扫术在晚期直肠癌中的作用:当前证据和结果回顾。
直肠癌转移性盆腔侧淋巴结(LPN)对预后和治疗策略有重大影响。西方的治疗方法强调新辅助化放疗(CRT),而东方的治疗方法通常依赖于侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术(LPND)。本综述探讨了 LPND 在新辅助治疗(TNT)等现代治疗方法中不断演变的作用,以及 CRT 对临床可疑 LPN 管理的影响。我们全面回顾了比较 LPND 与直肠癌术前 CRT 治疗效果的主要文献,重点关注近期的进展和正在进行的争论。我们对包括 JCOG0212 试验和近期多中心试验在内的主要研究进行了分析,以评估 LPND 的疗效,尤其是与术前 CRT 或 TNT 联用时的疗效。目前的证据表明,在未接受放疗的患者中,LPND 比单纯的全直肠系膜切除术能降低局部复发率。然而,在新辅助 CRT 的情况下,LPND 的益处受到 LPN 大小和治疗前特征的影响。虽然 CRT 可以有效控制较小的转移性 LPN,但较大或临床可疑的 LPN 可能需要 LPND 才能达到最佳疗效。机器人辅助 LPND 等手术技术的进步带来了潜在的益处,但也带来了挑战和并发症。TNT 在控制转移性 LPN 和改善患者预后方面的作用正在显现,但仍未得到充分探索。应根据患者的具体因素,包括LPN大小、对新辅助治疗的反应和外科医生的专业知识,决定是否实施LPND。未来的研究应侧重于优化治疗方案,并进一步评估 TNT 在管理转移性 LPN 方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
73
期刊最新文献
Analysis of adenoma detection rate of colonoscopy among trainees. Colonic stenting: is the bridge to surgery worth its cost? A cost-effectiveness analysis at a single Asian institution. Oncologic outcomes and associated factors of colon cancer patients aged 70 years and older. Colorectal screening following appendectomy in adult patients: a systematic review. Dissection layer selection based on an understanding of pelvic fascial anatomy in transanal total mesorectal excision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1