The Paradox of Modern Technology in Standardizing Thermal Liver Ablation: Fostering Uniformity or Diversity?

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1007/s00270-024-03846-2
Coosje A M Verhagen, Ariadne L van der Velden, Reto Bale, Elena Bozzi, Laura Crocetti, Alban Denys, Gonnie C M van Erp, Faeze Gholamiankhah, Giorgio Greco, Pim Hendriks, Robrecht R M M Knapen, Hicham Kobeiter, Rodolfo Lanocita, Martijn R Meijerink, Franco Orsi, Alice Phillips, Hossein Rahmani, Maarten L J Smits, Marco J L van Strijen, Ronald M van Dam, Christiaan van der Leij, Mark C Burgmans
{"title":"The Paradox of Modern Technology in Standardizing Thermal Liver Ablation: Fostering Uniformity or Diversity?","authors":"Coosje A M Verhagen, Ariadne L van der Velden, Reto Bale, Elena Bozzi, Laura Crocetti, Alban Denys, Gonnie C M van Erp, Faeze Gholamiankhah, Giorgio Greco, Pim Hendriks, Robrecht R M M Knapen, Hicham Kobeiter, Rodolfo Lanocita, Martijn R Meijerink, Franco Orsi, Alice Phillips, Hossein Rahmani, Maarten L J Smits, Marco J L van Strijen, Ronald M van Dam, Christiaan van der Leij, Mark C Burgmans","doi":"10.1007/s00270-024-03846-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Currently, significant medical practice variation exists in thermal ablation (TA) of malignant liver tumors with associated differences in outcomes. The IMaging and Advanced Guidance for workflow optimization in Interventional Oncology (IMAGIO) consortium aims to integrate interventional oncology into the standard clinical pathway for cancer treatment in Europe by 2030, by development of a standardized low-complex-high-precision workflow for TA of malignant liver tumors. This study was conducted at the start of the IMAGIO project with the aim to explore the current state and future role of modern technology in TA of malignant liver tumors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional questionnaire was conducted followed by an expert focus group discussion with core members and collaborating partners of the consortium.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 13 participants, 10 respondents filled in the questionnaire. During the focus group discussion, there was consensus on the need for international standardization in TA and several aspects of the procedure, such as planning based on cross-sectional images, the adoption of different techniques for needle placement and the importance of needle position- and post-ablative margin confirmation scans. Yet, also considerable heterogeneity was reported in the adoption of modern technology, particularly in navigational systems and computer-assisted margin assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study mirrored the current diversity in workflow of thermal liver ablation. To obtain comparable outcomes worldwide, standardization is needed. While advancements in tools and software hold the potential to homogenize outcome measurement and minimize operator-dependent variability, the rapid increase in availability also contributes to enhanced workflow variation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11486791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03846-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Currently, significant medical practice variation exists in thermal ablation (TA) of malignant liver tumors with associated differences in outcomes. The IMaging and Advanced Guidance for workflow optimization in Interventional Oncology (IMAGIO) consortium aims to integrate interventional oncology into the standard clinical pathway for cancer treatment in Europe by 2030, by development of a standardized low-complex-high-precision workflow for TA of malignant liver tumors. This study was conducted at the start of the IMAGIO project with the aim to explore the current state and future role of modern technology in TA of malignant liver tumors.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire was conducted followed by an expert focus group discussion with core members and collaborating partners of the consortium.

Results: Of the 13 participants, 10 respondents filled in the questionnaire. During the focus group discussion, there was consensus on the need for international standardization in TA and several aspects of the procedure, such as planning based on cross-sectional images, the adoption of different techniques for needle placement and the importance of needle position- and post-ablative margin confirmation scans. Yet, also considerable heterogeneity was reported in the adoption of modern technology, particularly in navigational systems and computer-assisted margin assessment.

Conclusion: This study mirrored the current diversity in workflow of thermal liver ablation. To obtain comparable outcomes worldwide, standardization is needed. While advancements in tools and software hold the potential to homogenize outcome measurement and minimize operator-dependent variability, the rapid increase in availability also contributes to enhanced workflow variation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代技术在肝脏热消融标准化中的悖论:促进统一性还是多样性?
目的:目前,恶性肝肿瘤的热消融术(TA)在医疗实践中存在很大差异,相关的治疗效果也不尽相同。IMAGIO(IMaging and Advanced Guidance for workflow optimization in Interventional Oncology)联盟的目标是到2030年将介入肿瘤学纳入欧洲癌症治疗的标准临床路径,为恶性肝脏肿瘤的热消融(TA)开发一套标准化的低复杂度高精度工作流程。这项研究是在 IMAGIO 项目开始时进行的,旨在探索现代技术在恶性肝肿瘤 TA 中的现状和未来作用:研究先进行了横向问卷调查,然后与联盟核心成员和合作伙伴进行了专家焦点小组讨论:结果:在 13 位参与者中,有 10 位填写了问卷。在焦点小组讨论中,与会者就 TA 国际标准化的必要性以及手术的几个方面达成了共识,如根据横断面图像进行规划、采用不同的置针技术以及针的位置和剥离后边缘确认扫描的重要性。然而,在采用现代技术,特别是导航系统和计算机辅助边缘评估方面也存在相当大的差异:本研究反映了当前肝脏热消融工作流程的多样性。为了在全球范围内获得可比的结果,需要实现标准化。虽然工具和软件的进步有可能使结果测量趋于一致,并最大限度地减少操作者的依赖性变异,但可用性的快速增长也导致了工作流程变异的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (CVIR) is the official journal of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, and is also the official organ of a number of additional distinguished national and international interventional radiological societies. CVIR publishes double blinded peer-reviewed original research work including clinical and laboratory investigations, technical notes, case reports, works in progress, and letters to the editor, as well as review articles, pictorial essays, editorials, and special invited submissions in the field of vascular and interventional radiology. Beside the communication of the latest research results in this field, it is also the aim of CVIR to support continuous medical education. Articles that are accepted for publication are done so with the understanding that they, or their substantive contents, have not been and will not be submitted to any other publication.
期刊最新文献
Liver Regeneration Following Thermal Ablation Using Nanocarrier Mediated Targeted Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy. A Commentary Discussing the Overlooked Domains of Complications, Adverse Events, and Quality Improvement in Interventional Radiology. In-Stent Restenosis in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Ultra-High-Resolution Photon-Counting Versus Third-Generation Dual-Source Energy-Integrating Detector CT Phantom Study in Seven Different Stent Types. Invited Commentary on « Cryoablation in Extra-Abdominal Desmoid Tumors: A 10-Year Experience in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients». Complications of Deep Venous Stenting and Their Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1