Shortened radiofrequency delivery time to optimize efficiency and safety of pulmonary vein isolation with the radiofrequency balloon: insights from the COLLABORATE registry.

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Europace Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1093/europace/euae227
Alexandre Almorad, Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca, Alvise Del Monte, Johan Vijgen, Pieter Koopman, René Worck, Arne Johannessen, Caroline Lepièce, Antoine de Meester de Ravenstein, Teresa Strisciuglio, Sara Poggi, Giuseppe Stabile, Carmelo La Greca, Joseph Antoine Kheir, Laurence Jesel-Morel, Milad El Haddad, Amin Hossein, Charles Audiat, Roberto Scacciavillani, Luigi Pannone, Carlo de Asmundis, Gian-Battista Chierchia
{"title":"Shortened radiofrequency delivery time to optimize efficiency and safety of pulmonary vein isolation with the radiofrequency balloon: insights from the COLLABORATE registry.","authors":"Alexandre Almorad, Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca, Alvise Del Monte, Johan Vijgen, Pieter Koopman, René Worck, Arne Johannessen, Caroline Lepièce, Antoine de Meester de Ravenstein, Teresa Strisciuglio, Sara Poggi, Giuseppe Stabile, Carmelo La Greca, Joseph Antoine Kheir, Laurence Jesel-Morel, Milad El Haddad, Amin Hossein, Charles Audiat, Roberto Scacciavillani, Luigi Pannone, Carlo de Asmundis, Gian-Battista Chierchia","doi":"10.1093/europace/euae227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Previous clinical studies on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with a radiofrequency balloon (RFB) reported safe and effective procedures using conventional ablation settings with 20/60 s RF delivery via posterior/anterior (PST/ANT) electrodes. The latest evidence suggests that reducing the application time to 15 s (s) on the posterior wall when facing the oesophageal region is as effective as applying 20 s. To prospectively assess whether reducing RF time on PST/ANT segments to 15/45 s can ensure sufficient quality of lesion metrics and compare the new shortened ablation settings with the conventional one in terms of safety, and effectiveness at 1-year.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A total of 641 patients from seven European centres were enrolled in a collaborative registry, with 374 in the conventional RF delivery group and 267 in the shortened RF delivery group. Procedural outcomes, lesion metrics, and safety profiles were assessed and compared between the groups. Freedom of any atrial tachycarrythmias at one year was 85.4% and 88.2% in the SHRT and CONV groups, respectively. The shortened RF delivery strategy was associated with significantly shorter procedure times (median 63.5 vs. 96.5 min, P < 0.001) and shortened fluoroscopy exposure (median 10.0 vs. 14.0 min, P < 0.001) compared to conventional delivery. Efficacy metrics, including first-pass isolation rates and time to isolation, were comparable between groups. Shortened RF delivery was associated with a lower incidence of procedural complications (1.4% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.04) and optimized thermal characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Analyses from the COLLABORATE registry demonstrate that shortening RF energy delivery times to 15/45 s (PST/ANT) during PVI with the RFB resulted in comparable freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia compared to conventional delivery times with comparable efficiency and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":11981,"journal":{"name":"Europace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424995/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europace","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae227","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Previous clinical studies on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with a radiofrequency balloon (RFB) reported safe and effective procedures using conventional ablation settings with 20/60 s RF delivery via posterior/anterior (PST/ANT) electrodes. The latest evidence suggests that reducing the application time to 15 s (s) on the posterior wall when facing the oesophageal region is as effective as applying 20 s. To prospectively assess whether reducing RF time on PST/ANT segments to 15/45 s can ensure sufficient quality of lesion metrics and compare the new shortened ablation settings with the conventional one in terms of safety, and effectiveness at 1-year.

Methods and results: A total of 641 patients from seven European centres were enrolled in a collaborative registry, with 374 in the conventional RF delivery group and 267 in the shortened RF delivery group. Procedural outcomes, lesion metrics, and safety profiles were assessed and compared between the groups. Freedom of any atrial tachycarrythmias at one year was 85.4% and 88.2% in the SHRT and CONV groups, respectively. The shortened RF delivery strategy was associated with significantly shorter procedure times (median 63.5 vs. 96.5 min, P < 0.001) and shortened fluoroscopy exposure (median 10.0 vs. 14.0 min, P < 0.001) compared to conventional delivery. Efficacy metrics, including first-pass isolation rates and time to isolation, were comparable between groups. Shortened RF delivery was associated with a lower incidence of procedural complications (1.4% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.04) and optimized thermal characteristics.

Conclusion: Analyses from the COLLABORATE registry demonstrate that shortening RF energy delivery times to 15/45 s (PST/ANT) during PVI with the RFB resulted in comparable freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia compared to conventional delivery times with comparable efficiency and safety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缩短射频传输时间,优化射频球囊肺静脉隔离的效率和安全性:COLLABORATE 登记的启示。
背景:之前关于使用射频球囊(RFB)进行肺静脉隔离(PVI)的临床研究报告称,使用常规消融设置,通过后/前(PST/ANT)电极进行 20/60 秒射频传输,手术安全有效。最新证据表明,在面对食管区域时,将后壁的射频应用时间缩短至 15 秒与 20 秒同样有效:前瞻性评估将 PST/ANT 区段的射频时间缩短至 15/45 秒是否能确保足够的病变指标质量,并比较新的缩短消融设置与传统消融设置的安全性和 1 年后的有效性:来自欧洲 7 个中心的 641 名患者参加了合作登记,其中 374 人属于传统射频消融组,267 人属于缩短射频消融组。对两组患者的手术结果、病变指标和安全性进行了评估和比较:结果:SHRT 组和 CONV 组一年后无任何房性快速性心律失常的比例分别为 85.4% 和 88.2%。与传统手术相比,缩短射频置管策略显著缩短了手术时间(中位数为 63.5 分钟对 96.5 分钟,P < 0.001),并缩短了透视暴露时间(中位数为 10.0 分钟对 14.0 分钟,P < 0.001)。两组的疗效指标(包括首次分离率和分离时间)相当。缩短射频给药时间与较低的手术并发症发生率(1.4% 对 5.3%,P = 0.04)和优化的热特性有关:COLLABORATE注册中心的分析表明,在使用RFB进行PVI时,将射频能量传输时间缩短至15/45秒(PST/ANT),与传统传输时间相比,可避免复发性房性快速性心律失常,且效率和安全性相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Europace
Europace 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
851
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: EP - Europace - European Journal of Pacing, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to provide an avenue of communication of top quality European and international original scientific work and reviews in the fields of Arrhythmias, Pacing and Cellular Electrophysiology. The Journal offers the reader a collection of contemporary original peer-reviewed papers, invited papers and editorial comments together with book reviews and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Multielectrode Catheter-Based Pulsed Electric Field Versus Cryoballoon For Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis. Familial risk of sinus node dysfunction indicating pacemaker implantation: A nation-wide cohort study. Increased Pacemaker Implantation and Mortality Rates in Relatives of Patients with Early-Onset Sinus Node Dysfunction: Can Genetics Explain All? aTrial arrhythmias in inhEriTed aRrhythmIa Syndromes: results from the TETRIS study. Temperature guided high and very high-power short duration ablation for atrial fibrillation treatment - The peQasus multicentre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1