Identifications of Similarity Metrics for Patients With Cancer: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Research Protocols Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.2196/58705
Iryna Manuilova, Jan Bossenz, Annemarie Bianka Weise, Dominik Boehm, Cosima Strantz, Philipp Unberath, Niklas Reimer, Patrick Metzger, Thomas Pauli, Silke D Werle, Susann Schulze, Sonja Hiemer, Arsenij Ustjanzew, Hans A Kestler, Hauke Busch, Benedikt Brors, Jan Christoph
{"title":"Identifications of Similarity Metrics for Patients With Cancer: Protocol for a Scoping Review.","authors":"Iryna Manuilova, Jan Bossenz, Annemarie Bianka Weise, Dominik Boehm, Cosima Strantz, Philipp Unberath, Niklas Reimer, Patrick Metzger, Thomas Pauli, Silke D Werle, Susann Schulze, Sonja Hiemer, Arsenij Ustjanzew, Hans A Kestler, Hauke Busch, Benedikt Brors, Jan Christoph","doi":"10.2196/58705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the similarities of patients with cancer is essential to advancing personalized medicine, improving patient outcomes, and developing more effective and individualized treatments. It enables researchers to discover important patterns, biomarkers, and treatment strategies that can have a significant impact on cancer research and oncology. In addition, the identification of previously successfully treated patients supports oncologists in making treatment decisions for a new patient who is clinically or molecularly similar to the previous patient.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The planned review aims to systematically summarize, map, and describe existing evidence to understand how patient similarity is defined and used in cancer research and clinical care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To systematically identify relevant studies and to ensure reproducibility and transparency of the review process, a comprehensive literature search will be conducted in several bibliographic databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, LIVIVIVO, and MEDLINE, covering the period from 1998 to February 2024. After the initial duplicate deletion phase, a study selection phase will be applied using Rayyan, which consists of 3 distinct steps: title and abstract screening, disagreement resolution, and full-text screening. To ensure the integrity and quality of the selection process, each of these steps is preceded by a pilot testing phase. This methodological process will culminate in the presentation of the final research results in a structured form according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) flowchart. The protocol has been registered in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This protocol outlines the methodologies used in conducting the scoping review. A search of the specified electronic databases and after removing duplicates resulted in 1183 unique records. As of March 2024, the review process has moved to the full-text evaluation phase. At this stage, data extraction will be conducted using a pretested chart template.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scoping review protocol, centered on these main concepts, aims to systematically map the available evidence on patient similarity among patients with cancer. By defining the types of data sources, approaches, and methods used in the field, and aligning these with the research questions, the review will provide a foundation for future research and clinical application in personalized cancer care. This protocol will guide the literature search, data extraction, and synthesis of findings to achieve the review's objectives.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/58705.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11411229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/58705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding the similarities of patients with cancer is essential to advancing personalized medicine, improving patient outcomes, and developing more effective and individualized treatments. It enables researchers to discover important patterns, biomarkers, and treatment strategies that can have a significant impact on cancer research and oncology. In addition, the identification of previously successfully treated patients supports oncologists in making treatment decisions for a new patient who is clinically or molecularly similar to the previous patient.

Objective: The planned review aims to systematically summarize, map, and describe existing evidence to understand how patient similarity is defined and used in cancer research and clinical care.

Methods: To systematically identify relevant studies and to ensure reproducibility and transparency of the review process, a comprehensive literature search will be conducted in several bibliographic databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, LIVIVIVO, and MEDLINE, covering the period from 1998 to February 2024. After the initial duplicate deletion phase, a study selection phase will be applied using Rayyan, which consists of 3 distinct steps: title and abstract screening, disagreement resolution, and full-text screening. To ensure the integrity and quality of the selection process, each of these steps is preceded by a pilot testing phase. This methodological process will culminate in the presentation of the final research results in a structured form according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) flowchart. The protocol has been registered in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.

Results: This protocol outlines the methodologies used in conducting the scoping review. A search of the specified electronic databases and after removing duplicates resulted in 1183 unique records. As of March 2024, the review process has moved to the full-text evaluation phase. At this stage, data extraction will be conducted using a pretested chart template.

Conclusions: The scoping review protocol, centered on these main concepts, aims to systematically map the available evidence on patient similarity among patients with cancer. By defining the types of data sources, approaches, and methods used in the field, and aligning these with the research questions, the review will provide a foundation for future research and clinical application in personalized cancer care. This protocol will guide the literature search, data extraction, and synthesis of findings to achieve the review's objectives.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/58705.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定癌症患者的相似性指标:范围审查协议》。
背景:了解癌症患者的相似性对于推进个性化医疗、改善患者预后以及开发更有效的个性化治疗方法至关重要。它使研究人员能够发现重要的模式、生物标记物和治疗策略,从而对癌症研究和肿瘤学产生重大影响。此外,对以前成功治疗过的患者进行鉴定有助于肿瘤学家对临床或分子上与以前的患者相似的新患者做出治疗决定:计划中的综述旨在系统地总结、绘制和描述现有证据,以了解在癌症研究和临床治疗中如何定义和使用患者相似性:为了系统地识别相关研究并确保综述过程的可重复性和透明度,我们将在多个文献数据库(包括 Web of Science、PubMed、LIVIVO 和 MEDLINE)中进行全面的文献检索,时间跨度为 1998 年至 2024 年 2 月。在最初的重复删除阶段之后,将使用 Rayyan 进行研究筛选阶段,该阶段包括 3 个不同的步骤:标题和摘要筛选、分歧解决和全文筛选。为确保筛选过程的完整性和质量,每个步骤之前都有一个试点测试阶段。根据 PRISMA-ScR(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 扩展至范围综述)流程图,这一方法论过程最终将以结构化的形式展示最终研究成果。该协议已在《医学互联网研究杂志》(Journal of Medical Internet Research)上注册:本协议概述了进行范围界定综述所使用的方法。对指定电子数据库进行检索并删除重复内容后,共获得 1183 条唯一记录。截至 2024 年 3 月,综述过程已进入全文评估阶段。在此阶段,将使用预先测试的图表模板进行数据提取:范围界定审查协议以这些主要概念为中心,旨在系统地绘制有关癌症患者相似性的现有证据图。通过定义该领域所使用的数据来源、方法和手段的类型,并将其与研究问题相结合,该综述将为个性化癌症护理的未来研究和临床应用奠定基础。本协议将指导文献检索、数据提取和研究结果的综合,以实现综述的目标:DERR1-10.2196/58705。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
414
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Noninvasive, Multimodal Inflammatory Biomarker Discovery for Systemic Inflammation (NOVA Study): Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study. The CHALO! 2.0 mHealth-Based Multilevel Intervention to Promote HIV Testing and Linkage-to-Care Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Mumbai, India: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. The COSMOS Registry of CytoSorb Hemoadsorption Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: Protocol for an International, Prospective Registry. The Effect of Effort During a Resistance Exercise Session on Glycemic Control in Individuals Living With Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial. Influence of Distraction Factors on Performance in Laparoscopic Surgery in Immersive Virtual Reality: Study Protocol of a Cross-Over Trial in Medical Students and Residents-DisLapVR.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1