The Effect of a Separate Flow of Patients With Small Traumatic Injuries on Consult Time and Patient Satisfaction: A Retrospective Cohort Study During COVID-19 in the Emergency Department.
{"title":"The Effect of a Separate Flow of Patients With Small Traumatic Injuries on Consult Time and Patient Satisfaction: A Retrospective Cohort Study During COVID-19 in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Poorvi Narwade, Loes Walraven, Djoke Douma-Den Hamer","doi":"10.6705/j.jacme.202409_14(3).0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With emergency department (ED) crowding and high workloads burdening healthcare, efficient patient flow management becomes increasingly crucial. A significant portion of this crowding is attributed to patients with minor traumatic injuries. The objective of this study is to investigate to what extent a separate patient flow for patients with small traumatic injuries influences consult times and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During COVID-19, patients with small traumatic injuries in the ED were redirected to an outpatient clinic (the Fracture Clinic). The Fracture Clinic was maintained for seven weeks during which the consult time and patient satisfaction were recorded for every individual. Retrospectively, the same procedure was followed for the seven weeks prior to the outbreak of COVID, with the regular procedure in place.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 922 patients were included in the research: 415 patients in the intervention group (Fracture Clinic) and 507 patients in the control group (ED group). The consult time in the Fracture Clinic (median = 30 min) is significantly lower compared to the ED group (median = 86 min) (U = 25,147.500, z = 19.9, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The overall consult in terms of patient satisfaction scored higher for the Fracture Clinic Group than the ED group (T[df] = -4.449 [479], <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Fracture Clinic resulted in shorter consult times and an increased patient satisfaction compared to the usual patient flow for patients with small traumatic injuries in the ED. These patients could be redirected to an outpatient clinical setting to improve efficiency in patient flow, while avoiding a negative impact from the triage system in which they usually are the lowest priority.</p>","PeriodicalId":14846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of acute medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of acute medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6705/j.jacme.202409_14(3).0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: With emergency department (ED) crowding and high workloads burdening healthcare, efficient patient flow management becomes increasingly crucial. A significant portion of this crowding is attributed to patients with minor traumatic injuries. The objective of this study is to investigate to what extent a separate patient flow for patients with small traumatic injuries influences consult times and patient satisfaction.
Methods: During COVID-19, patients with small traumatic injuries in the ED were redirected to an outpatient clinic (the Fracture Clinic). The Fracture Clinic was maintained for seven weeks during which the consult time and patient satisfaction were recorded for every individual. Retrospectively, the same procedure was followed for the seven weeks prior to the outbreak of COVID, with the regular procedure in place.
Results: In total, 922 patients were included in the research: 415 patients in the intervention group (Fracture Clinic) and 507 patients in the control group (ED group). The consult time in the Fracture Clinic (median = 30 min) is significantly lower compared to the ED group (median = 86 min) (U = 25,147.500, z = 19.9, p < 0.001). The overall consult in terms of patient satisfaction scored higher for the Fracture Clinic Group than the ED group (T[df] = -4.449 [479], p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The Fracture Clinic resulted in shorter consult times and an increased patient satisfaction compared to the usual patient flow for patients with small traumatic injuries in the ED. These patients could be redirected to an outpatient clinical setting to improve efficiency in patient flow, while avoiding a negative impact from the triage system in which they usually are the lowest priority.