Validity and Reliability of the Korean Versions of the 9- and 19-Item Wearing-Off Questionnaires in Parkinson's Disease.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Clinical Neurology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.3988/jcn.2023.0339
Jinse Park, Wooyoung Jang, Jinyoung Youn, Eungseok Oh, Suyeon Park, Yoonsang Oh, Hee-Tae Kim, Soohyun Lim
{"title":"Validity and Reliability of the Korean Versions of the 9- and 19-Item Wearing-Off Questionnaires in Parkinson's Disease.","authors":"Jinse Park, Wooyoung Jang, Jinyoung Youn, Eungseok Oh, Suyeon Park, Yoonsang Oh, Hee-Tae Kim, Soohyun Lim","doi":"10.3988/jcn.2023.0339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The wearing-off (WO) phenomenon is the most common motor complication in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), but its identification remains challenging. The 9- and 19-item Wearing-off Questionnaires (WOQ-9 and WOQ-19) are self-assessment tools for motor and nonmotor symptoms that are widely used for WO screening. We produced Korean versions of the WOQ-19 and WOQ-9 (K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9) and investigated their validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the translation-back translation method to produce K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9, which were self-administered by 124 patients with PD. We conducted in-depth 10-minute interviews for confirming the presence of the WO phenomenon, and then stratified the participants into groups with and without WO. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed byanalyzing receiver operating characteristic curves. Concurrent validity was assessed using the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) andthe Hoehn and Yahr stage with Spearman's rank correlation analysis. Reliability was assessedbased on test-retest Cohen's kappa (κ) values and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal cutoff scores on the K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 for WO screening were 4 and 2, respectively. The test-retest ICCs of K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 were 0.943 and 0.938, respectively. Nineteen of the combined 20 items in K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 showed moderate-to-substantial agreement (κ=0.412-0.771, <i>p</i><0.001). The scores on the translated scales were significantly correlated with MDS-UPDRS IV scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 are reliable and valid tools for detecting WO, with optimal cutoff scores of 4 and 2, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":15432,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2023.0339","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: The wearing-off (WO) phenomenon is the most common motor complication in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), but its identification remains challenging. The 9- and 19-item Wearing-off Questionnaires (WOQ-9 and WOQ-19) are self-assessment tools for motor and nonmotor symptoms that are widely used for WO screening. We produced Korean versions of the WOQ-19 and WOQ-9 (K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9) and investigated their validity and reliability.

Methods: We used the translation-back translation method to produce K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9, which were self-administered by 124 patients with PD. We conducted in-depth 10-minute interviews for confirming the presence of the WO phenomenon, and then stratified the participants into groups with and without WO. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed byanalyzing receiver operating characteristic curves. Concurrent validity was assessed using the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) andthe Hoehn and Yahr stage with Spearman's rank correlation analysis. Reliability was assessedbased on test-retest Cohen's kappa (κ) values and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results: The optimal cutoff scores on the K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 for WO screening were 4 and 2, respectively. The test-retest ICCs of K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 were 0.943 and 0.938, respectively. Nineteen of the combined 20 items in K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 showed moderate-to-substantial agreement (κ=0.412-0.771, p<0.001). The scores on the translated scales were significantly correlated with MDS-UPDRS IV scores.

Conclusions: K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 are reliable and valid tools for detecting WO, with optimal cutoff scores of 4 and 2, respectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帕金森病患者 9 项和 19 项磨损问卷韩文版的有效性和可靠性。
背景和目的:磨损(WO)现象是晚期帕金森病(PD)最常见的运动并发症,但其识别仍具有挑战性。9 项和 19 项磨损问卷(WOQ-9 和 WOQ-19)是运动和非运动症状的自我评估工具,被广泛用于磨损现象的筛查。我们制作了 WOQ-19 和 WOQ-9 的韩文版本(K-WOQ-19 和 K-WOQ-9),并对其有效性和可靠性进行了研究:方法:我们采用翻译-回译法制作了 K-WOQ-19 和 K-WOQ-9,并由 124 名帕金森病患者自我填写。我们进行了 10 分钟的深度访谈,以确认是否存在 WO 现象,然后将参与者分为有 WO 组和无 WO 组。诊断准确性通过分析接收者操作特征曲线进行评估。同时有效性是通过运动障碍协会-统一帕金森病评定量表(MDS-UPDRS)和霍恩与雅尔分期(Hoehn and Yahr stage)的斯皮尔曼等级相关分析来评估的。根据检验-再检验科恩卡帕(κ)值和类内相关系数(ICC)评估了可靠性:用于WO筛查的K-WOQ-19和K-WOQ-9的最佳临界分数分别为4分和2分。K-WOQ-19和K-WOQ-9的测试-再测ICC分别为0.943和0.938。在K-WOQ-19和K-WOQ-9的20个合并项目中,19个项目显示出中度到实质性的一致性(κ=0.412-0.771,p结论:K-WOQ-19和K-WOQ-9是检测WO的可靠而有效的工具,其最佳临界值分别为4分和2分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurology
Journal of Clinical Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JCN aims to publish the cutting-edge research from around the world. The JCN covers clinical and translational research for physicians and researchers in the field of neurology. Encompassing the entire neurological diseases, our main focus is on the common disorders including stroke, epilepsy, Parkinson''s disease, dementia, multiple sclerosis, headache, and peripheral neuropathy. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor. The JCN will allow clinical neurologists to enrich their knowledge of patient management, education, and clinical or experimental research, and hence their professionalism.
期刊最新文献
Customized Visual Discrimination Digital Therapy According to Visual Field Defects in Chronic Stroke Patients. Genetic Diagnosis in Neonatal Encephalopathy With Hypoxic Brain Damage Using Targeted Gene Panel Sequencing. Impact of Apolipoprotein E ε4 in Alzheimer's Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Voxel-Based Morphometry Studies. Impact of Apolipoprotein E ε4 in Alzheimer's Disease: Insights From a Meta-Analysis. Long-Term Outcome of Motor Functional Neurological Disorder After Rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1