Effect of Screening for Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation on Stroke Prevention.

IF 21.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of the American College of Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.019
Renato D Lopes, Steven J Atlas, Alan S Go, Steven A Lubitz, David D McManus, Rowena J Dolor, Ranee Chatterjee, Michael B Rothberg, David R Rushlow, Lori A Crosson, Ronald S Aronson, Michael Patlakh, Dianne Gallup, Donna J Mills, Emily C O'Brien, Daniel E Singer
{"title":"Effect of Screening for Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation on Stroke Prevention.","authors":"Renato D Lopes, Steven J Atlas, Alan S Go, Steven A Lubitz, David D McManus, Rowena J Dolor, Ranee Chatterjee, Michael B Rothberg, David R Rushlow, Lori A Crosson, Ronald S Aronson, Michael Patlakh, Dianne Gallup, Donna J Mills, Emily C O'Brien, Daniel E Singer","doi":"10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial fibrillation (AF) often remains undiagnosed, and it independently raises the risk of ischemic stroke, which is largely reversible by oral anticoagulation. Although randomized trials using longer term screening approaches increase identification of AF, no studies have established that AF screening lowers stroke rates.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To address this knowledge gap, the GUARD-AF (Reducing Stroke by Screening for Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Individuals) trial screened participants in primary care practices using a 14-day continuous electrocardiographic monitor to determine whether screening for AF coupled with physician/patient decision-making to use oral anticoagulation reduces stroke and provides a net clinical benefit compared with usual care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GUARD-AF was a prospective, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial designed to test whether screening for AF in people aged ≥70 years using a 14-day single-lead continuous electrocardiographic patch monitor could identify patients with undiagnosed AF and reduce stroke. Participants were randomized 1:1 to screening or usual care. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were hospitalization due to all-cause stroke and bleeding, respectively. Analyses used the intention-to-treat population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Enrollment began on December 17, 2019, and involved 149 primary care sites across the United States. The COVID-19 pandemic led to premature termination of enrollment, with 11,905 participants in the intention-to-treat population. Median follow-up was 15.3 months (Q1-Q3: 13.8-17.6 months). Median age was 75 years (Q1-Q3: 72-79 years), and 56.6% were female. The risk of stroke in the screening group was 0.7% vs 0.6% in the usual care group (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.69-1.75). The risk of bleeding was 1.0% in the screening group vs 1.1% in the usual care group (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.60-1.26). Diagnosis of AF was 5% in the screening group and 3.3% in the usual care group, and initiation of oral anticoagulation after randomization was 4.2% and 2.8%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this trial, there was no evidence that screening for AF using a 14-day continuous electrocardiographic monitor in people ≥70 years of age seen in primary care practice reduces stroke hospitalizations. Event rates were low, however, and the trial did not enroll the planned sample size.(Reducing Stroke by Screening for Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Individuals [GUARD-AF]; NCT04126486).</p>","PeriodicalId":17187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":21.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) often remains undiagnosed, and it independently raises the risk of ischemic stroke, which is largely reversible by oral anticoagulation. Although randomized trials using longer term screening approaches increase identification of AF, no studies have established that AF screening lowers stroke rates.

Objectives: To address this knowledge gap, the GUARD-AF (Reducing Stroke by Screening for Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Individuals) trial screened participants in primary care practices using a 14-day continuous electrocardiographic monitor to determine whether screening for AF coupled with physician/patient decision-making to use oral anticoagulation reduces stroke and provides a net clinical benefit compared with usual care.

Methods: GUARD-AF was a prospective, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial designed to test whether screening for AF in people aged ≥70 years using a 14-day single-lead continuous electrocardiographic patch monitor could identify patients with undiagnosed AF and reduce stroke. Participants were randomized 1:1 to screening or usual care. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were hospitalization due to all-cause stroke and bleeding, respectively. Analyses used the intention-to-treat population.

Results: Enrollment began on December 17, 2019, and involved 149 primary care sites across the United States. The COVID-19 pandemic led to premature termination of enrollment, with 11,905 participants in the intention-to-treat population. Median follow-up was 15.3 months (Q1-Q3: 13.8-17.6 months). Median age was 75 years (Q1-Q3: 72-79 years), and 56.6% were female. The risk of stroke in the screening group was 0.7% vs 0.6% in the usual care group (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.69-1.75). The risk of bleeding was 1.0% in the screening group vs 1.1% in the usual care group (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.60-1.26). Diagnosis of AF was 5% in the screening group and 3.3% in the usual care group, and initiation of oral anticoagulation after randomization was 4.2% and 2.8%, respectively.

Conclusions: In this trial, there was no evidence that screening for AF using a 14-day continuous electrocardiographic monitor in people ≥70 years of age seen in primary care practice reduces stroke hospitalizations. Event rates were low, however, and the trial did not enroll the planned sample size.(Reducing Stroke by Screening for Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Individuals [GUARD-AF]; NCT04126486).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
筛查未确诊心房颤动对预防中风的影响
背景:心房颤动(房颤)常常得不到诊断,它可单独增加缺血性中风的风险,而口服抗凝药在很大程度上可逆转这种风险。尽管采用长期筛查方法的随机试验提高了房颤的识别率,但还没有研究证实房颤筛查能降低中风发病率:为了填补这一知识空白,GUARD-AF(通过筛查未确诊的老年人心房颤动减少中风)试验使用 14 天连续心电监护仪对初级保健实践中的参与者进行筛查,以确定心房颤动筛查与医生/患者决定使用口服抗凝药相比是否能减少中风并提供净临床获益:GUARD-AF 是一项前瞻性、平行组、随机对照试验,旨在测试使用 14 天单导联连续心电图贴片监护仪对年龄≥70 岁的人群进行房颤筛查是否能识别出未确诊的房颤患者并减少中风。参与者按 1:1 的比例随机接受筛查或常规治疗。主要疗效和安全性结果分别为全因中风住院和出血。分析采用意向治疗人群:入组始于 2019 年 12 月 17 日,涉及全美 149 个基层医疗机构。COVID-19大流行导致入组提前终止,意向治疗人群中有11905名参与者。中位随访时间为15.3个月(Q1-Q3:13.8-17.6个月)。中位年龄为 75 岁(Q1-Q3:72-79 岁),56.6% 为女性。筛查组的中风风险为 0.7%,而常规护理组为 0.6%(HR:1.10;95% CI:0.69-1.75)。筛查组出血风险为 1.0%,常规护理组为 1.1%(HR:0.87;95% CI:0.60-1.26)。筛查组心房颤动诊断率为5%,常规护理组为3.3%,随机分组后开始口服抗凝药的比例分别为4.2%和2.8%:在这项试验中,没有证据表明使用 14 天连续心电图监测仪对基层医疗机构中年龄≥70 岁的患者进行房颤筛查可减少中风住院率。然而,事件发生率较低,而且该试验并未达到计划的样本量(Reducing Stroke by Screening for Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Individuals [GUARD-AF]; NCT04126486)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
42.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
5097
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) publishes peer-reviewed articles highlighting all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance, state-of-the-art papers and viewpoints. Content Profile: -Original Investigations -JACC State-of-the-Art Reviews -JACC Review Topics of the Week -Guidelines & Clinical Documents -JACC Guideline Comparisons -JACC Scientific Expert Panels -Cardiovascular Medicine & Society -Editorial Comments (accompanying every Original Investigation) -Research Letters -Fellows-in-Training/Early Career Professional Pages -Editor’s Pages from the Editor-in-Chief or other invited thought leaders
期刊最新文献
REPLY REPLY Reply REPLY Reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1