Female Victims of Firearm Intimate Partner Violence: Characterization and Lethality Predictors.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of women's health Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1089/jwh.2024.0279
Lauren T Callaghan, Gracen Moran, Deborah Brisola, Kyle Blackburn, Belia Camarena, Ojas Dumbre, Cary Cain, Caitlin Perez-Stable, Tiffany Lee, Catherine Seger, Bindi Naik-Mathuria
{"title":"Female Victims of Firearm Intimate Partner Violence: Characterization and Lethality Predictors.","authors":"Lauren T Callaghan, Gracen Moran, Deborah Brisola, Kyle Blackburn, Belia Camarena, Ojas Dumbre, Cary Cain, Caitlin Perez-Stable, Tiffany Lee, Catherine Seger, Bindi Naik-Mathuria","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To characterize the sociological risk factors for firearm intimate partner violence (IPV) among women in Texas, with a focus on lethal predictors to aid in screening and intervention guidelines. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective medical and forensic chart review was conducted and supplemented by news sources, public police reports, and court records on firearm cases in Houston, TX, from 2018 to 2020. IPV was defined as a cis-gendered female victim of firearm violence from a current or ex-intimate partner. Non-IPV was defined as cis-gendered female victims of firearm violence from strangers, friends/acquaintances, gang, client, or similar relationships. Numeric variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and reported as median [Q1, Q3]. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test and reported as count (%). <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 102 cases of IPV were identified. Nonspousal IPV was more prevalent than spousal (65.7% versus 34.3%). Lethal injuries, older age, home location, and head injuries were more prevalent in the IPV cohort. Older age, spousal perpetrator, home shooting location, and history of prior domestic abuse were associated with lethal IPV. There were 31 cases of murder-suicide. During the COVID-19 pandemic, IPV cases increased by 91.3%, with lethal cases increasing by 57.6%. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Risk factors for overall IPV and lethal IPV are not the same; therefore, it is imperative that all women, irrespective of race, age, or relationship status, be screened for IPV and prior domestic violence to allow intervention and prevention of lethal IPV. Patients should also be screened for personal or partner access to firearms as firearm IPV is a highly lethal form of violence.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To characterize the sociological risk factors for firearm intimate partner violence (IPV) among women in Texas, with a focus on lethal predictors to aid in screening and intervention guidelines. Methods: A retrospective medical and forensic chart review was conducted and supplemented by news sources, public police reports, and court records on firearm cases in Houston, TX, from 2018 to 2020. IPV was defined as a cis-gendered female victim of firearm violence from a current or ex-intimate partner. Non-IPV was defined as cis-gendered female victims of firearm violence from strangers, friends/acquaintances, gang, client, or similar relationships. Numeric variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and reported as median [Q1, Q3]. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test and reported as count (%). Results: A total of 102 cases of IPV were identified. Nonspousal IPV was more prevalent than spousal (65.7% versus 34.3%). Lethal injuries, older age, home location, and head injuries were more prevalent in the IPV cohort. Older age, spousal perpetrator, home shooting location, and history of prior domestic abuse were associated with lethal IPV. There were 31 cases of murder-suicide. During the COVID-19 pandemic, IPV cases increased by 91.3%, with lethal cases increasing by 57.6%. Conclusion: Risk factors for overall IPV and lethal IPV are not the same; therefore, it is imperative that all women, irrespective of race, age, or relationship status, be screened for IPV and prior domestic violence to allow intervention and prevention of lethal IPV. Patients should also be screened for personal or partner access to firearms as firearm IPV is a highly lethal form of violence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
枪支亲密伴侣暴力的女性受害者:特征和致命性预测因素。
目的描述得克萨斯州妇女遭受枪支亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 的社会学风险因素,重点关注致命的预测因素,以帮助制定筛查和干预指南。方法对德克萨斯州休斯顿市 2018 年至 2020 年的枪支案件进行回顾性医疗和法医病历审查,并辅以新闻来源、公共警方报告和法庭记录。IPV 被定义为遭受现任或前任亲密伴侣枪支暴力的顺性别女性受害者。非 IPV 被定义为来自陌生人、朋友/熟人、帮派、客户或类似关系的枪支暴力的顺性别女性受害者。数字变量采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验进行比较,并以中位数 [Q1, Q3] 进行报告。分类变量采用费雪精确检验进行比较,并以计数(%)形式报告。结果共发现 102 例 IPV。非配偶间的 IPV 发生率高于配偶间(65.7% 对 34.3%)。在 IPV 群体中,致命伤、年龄偏大、居住地点和头部伤害更为普遍。高龄、配偶施暴者、家庭枪击地点和先前的家庭虐待史与致命的 IPV 有关。谋杀-自杀案件共有 31 起。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,IPV 案件增加了 91.3%,致命案件增加了 57.6%。结论总体 IPV 和致命 IPV 的风险因素不尽相同;因此,所有妇女,无论种族、年龄或关系状况如何,都必须接受 IPV 和先前家庭暴力的筛查,以便对致命 IPV 进行干预和预防。此外,还应筛查患者个人或伴侣是否接触过枪支,因为枪支类 IPV 是一种致命性很高的暴力形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of women's health
Journal of women's health 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Women''s Health is the primary source of information for meeting the challenges of providing optimal health care for women throughout their lifespan. The Journal delivers cutting-edge advancements in diagnostic procedures, therapeutic protocols for the management of diseases, and innovative research in gender-based biology that impacts patient care and treatment. Journal of Women’s Health coverage includes: -Internal Medicine Endocrinology- Cardiology- Oncology- Obstetrics/Gynecology- Urogynecology- Psychiatry- Neurology- Nutrition- Sex-Based Biology- Complementary Medicine- Sports Medicine- Surgery- Medical Education- Public Policy.
期刊最新文献
An Analysis of Opioid Consumption and Patient Recovery after Hysterectomy by Surgical Approach. Socioeconomic, Demographic, and Clinical Factors Associated with Postpartum Readmission. Nonuse of Contraception at Conception Due to Partner Objection and Pregnancy-Related Health Care Utilization, Postpartum Health, and Infant Birth Outcomes. Health Disparities in Vasomotor Symptom Prevalence and Treatment Discontinuation in Women of Menopausal Age: A Commercial Claims Analysis. Patient-Reported Pregnancy Outcomes and Survival in Women with Aortic Valve and/or Aortic Root Replacement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1