Jailed Balloon Technique Versus Jailed Wire Technique for Side Branch Ostium Protection in Bifurcation Lesions: Evidence from Three-dimensional Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-21 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2508300
JianGuo Cui, Xun Wu, QinHua Jin, YunDai Chen
{"title":"Jailed Balloon Technique Versus Jailed Wire Technique for Side Branch Ostium Protection in Bifurcation Lesions: Evidence from Three-dimensional Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis.","authors":"JianGuo Cui, Xun Wu, QinHua Jin, YunDai Chen","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2508300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is controversy regarding the effectiveness the of jailed wire technique (JWT) and jailed balloon technique (JBT) in preserving the side branch (SB) during treatment. This study compares the protective effect of JBT versus JWT on the SB ostium area in coronary bifurcation lesions using three-dimensional optical coherence tomography (3D-OCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained data from coronary heart disease patients who received OCT-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions. The SB protection strategies were divided into JWT and JBT, with the latter further subdivided into active JBT (A-JBT) and conventional JBT (C-JBT). The primary endpoint was the SB ostium area difference measured by 3D-OCT before and after PCI. Partial correlation analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) was used to mitigate confounding biases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 207 bifurcation lesions from 191 patients were analyzed, including 136 lesions treated with JWT and 71 lesions treated with JBT. The SB ostium area was significantly greater in the JBT group compared to the JWT group (0.41 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 1.22 mm<sup>2</sup> vs. -0.25 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 1.40 mm<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Following 1:1 PSM to adjust for 60 pairs, the difference between groups was not statistically significant (0.28 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 1.06 mm<sup>2</sup> vs. -0.02 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 1.29 mm<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.165). Subgroup analysis revealed that A-JBT provided superior protection in both true (0.47 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 1.22 mm<sup>2</sup> vs. -0.10 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 1.10 mm<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.011) and non-true bifurcation lesions (0.56 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 1.43 mm<sup>2</sup> vs. -0.38 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 1.62 mm<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.030) over JWT, while C-JBT provided protection similar to JWT. A positive partial correlation was observed between the diameter of the jailed balloon and the increase in SB ostium area (r = 0.296, <i>p</i> = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, A-JBT, but not C-JBT, provided better protection in bifurcation lesions compared to JWT. The larger diameter of the jailed balloon, rather than the application of higher pressure, enhanced the SB protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2508300","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is controversy regarding the effectiveness the of jailed wire technique (JWT) and jailed balloon technique (JBT) in preserving the side branch (SB) during treatment. This study compares the protective effect of JBT versus JWT on the SB ostium area in coronary bifurcation lesions using three-dimensional optical coherence tomography (3D-OCT).

Methods: We obtained data from coronary heart disease patients who received OCT-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions. The SB protection strategies were divided into JWT and JBT, with the latter further subdivided into active JBT (A-JBT) and conventional JBT (C-JBT). The primary endpoint was the SB ostium area difference measured by 3D-OCT before and after PCI. Partial correlation analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) was used to mitigate confounding biases.

Results: A total of 207 bifurcation lesions from 191 patients were analyzed, including 136 lesions treated with JWT and 71 lesions treated with JBT. The SB ostium area was significantly greater in the JBT group compared to the JWT group (0.41 ± 1.22 mm2 vs. -0.25 ± 1.40 mm2, p = 0.001). Following 1:1 PSM to adjust for 60 pairs, the difference between groups was not statistically significant (0.28 ± 1.06 mm2 vs. -0.02 ± 1.29 mm2, p = 0.165). Subgroup analysis revealed that A-JBT provided superior protection in both true (0.47 ± 1.22 mm2 vs. -0.10 ± 1.10 mm2, p = 0.011) and non-true bifurcation lesions (0.56 ± 1.43 mm2 vs. -0.38 ± 1.62 mm2, p = 0.030) over JWT, while C-JBT provided protection similar to JWT. A positive partial correlation was observed between the diameter of the jailed balloon and the increase in SB ostium area (r = 0.296, p = 0.013).

Conclusions: Overall, A-JBT, but not C-JBT, provided better protection in bifurcation lesions compared to JWT. The larger diameter of the jailed balloon, rather than the application of higher pressure, enhanced the SB protection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
栓塞球囊技术与栓塞钢丝技术在分叉病变侧支骨膜保护中的应用:三维光学相干断层扫描分析的证据。
背景:关于栓塞钢丝技术(JWT)和栓塞球囊技术(JBT)在治疗过程中保护侧支(SB)的有效性存在争议。本研究使用三维光学相干断层扫描(3D-OCT)比较了 JBT 和 JWT 对冠状动脉分叉病变中 SB 支的保护作用:我们获得了在 OCT 引导下接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗分叉病变的冠心病患者的数据。SB保护策略分为JWT和JBT,后者又分为主动JBT(A-JBT)和传统JBT(C-JBT)。主要终点是PCI前后通过3D-OCT测量的SB骨膜面积差异。采用部分相关性分析和倾向评分匹配(PSM)来减轻混杂偏倚:共分析了191名患者的207个分叉病变,其中136个病变接受了JWT治疗,71个病变接受了JBT治疗。与 JWT 组相比,JBT 组的 SB 管腔面积明显更大(0.41 ± 1.22 mm2 vs. -0.25 ± 1.40 mm2,p = 0.001)。经过 1:1 PSM 调整 60 对后,组间差异无统计学意义(0.28 ± 1.06 mm2 vs. -0.02 ± 1.29 mm2,p = 0.165)。亚组分析显示,A-JBT 对真实病变(0.47 ± 1.22 mm2 vs. -0.10 ± 1.10 mm2,p = 0.011)和非真实分叉病变(0.56 ± 1.43 mm2 vs. -0.38 ± 1.62 mm2,p = 0.030)的保护效果均优于 JWT,而 C-JBT 的保护效果与 JWT 相似。囚禁球囊的直径与 SB 骨膜面积的增加呈部分正相关(r = 0.296,p = 0.013):总体而言,与 JWT 相比,A-JBT(而非 C-JBT)能更好地保护分叉病变。更大直径的锚定球囊,而不是应用更高的压力,增强了对 SB 的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
期刊最新文献
The Vectorcardiogram Characteristic and Its Predictive Value for Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction of Children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Outcome of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Pure Native Aortic Regurgitation in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension. Advantages of using Genetically Elevated Lipoprotein(a) Levels in Predicting 5-Year Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Relating to Coronary Artery Disease in Women. Bicuspid Aortic Valve, from the Unknown till the Perfection of the Species. Atrial High-Rate Episodes and Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation: State of the Art and Clinical Questions with Complex Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1