A Curriculum on Advanced Topics in Hypertension for Internal Medicine Residents.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Southern Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001732
Benjamin D Gallagher, Donna M Windish
{"title":"A Curriculum on Advanced Topics in Hypertension for Internal Medicine Residents.","authors":"Benjamin D Gallagher, Donna M Windish","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hypertension (HTN) affects nearly half of US adults. Our multi-institutional survey revealed that Internal Medicine residents lack proficiency in advanced HTN topics. We developed a curriculum to address knowledge gaps in these topics and aimed to assess the effects of the curriculum on residents' confidence, desire for future training, and knowledge in advanced HTN topics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>HTN experts taught four advanced topics in HTN: conducting a workup for secondary HTN, managing HTN in chronic kidney disease, managing HTN in patients who are or may become pregnant, and managing hypertensive urgency (severe asymptomatic HTN) in the outpatient setting. The setting of the curriculum was an ambulatory educational half-day, during which residents rotated through small-group sessions dedicated to each HTN topic. We developed pre-, immediate post-, and 8 weeks postcurriculum surveys assessing residents' confidence and desire for future training in the four topics (4-point Likert scales), and multiple-choice quizzes to assess changes in knowledge. We used repeated-measures analysis of variance to compare means between time points for surveys and quizzes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 112 Internal Medicine residents participated in the curriculum. The mean confidence scores for all four topics increased from 1.79 to 2.61 precurriculum to 2.90 to 3.45 immediately postcurriculum (all <i>P</i> < 0.001) and remained higher (2.53-3.18) than precurriculum at 8 weeks postcurriculum (all <i>P</i> < 0.02). The mean desire for future training scores decreased from 2.74 to 2.96 precurriculum to 2.06 to 2.36 immediately postcurriculum (all <i>P</i> < 0.001 except for managing HTN in patients who are or may become pregnant, which was <i>P</i> = 0.17) and remained lower (2.08-2.36) than precurriculum at 8 weeks postcurriculum (all <i>P</i> ≤ 0.003). The mean knowledge score increased from 48% precurriculum to 62% immediate postcurriculum (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and remained higher (55%) than precurriculum at 8 weeks postcurriculum (<i>P</i> = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A curriculum on advanced HTN topics produced durable gains in confidence and knowledge and partially satisfied the desire for future learning among Internal Medicine residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001732","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Hypertension (HTN) affects nearly half of US adults. Our multi-institutional survey revealed that Internal Medicine residents lack proficiency in advanced HTN topics. We developed a curriculum to address knowledge gaps in these topics and aimed to assess the effects of the curriculum on residents' confidence, desire for future training, and knowledge in advanced HTN topics.

Methods: HTN experts taught four advanced topics in HTN: conducting a workup for secondary HTN, managing HTN in chronic kidney disease, managing HTN in patients who are or may become pregnant, and managing hypertensive urgency (severe asymptomatic HTN) in the outpatient setting. The setting of the curriculum was an ambulatory educational half-day, during which residents rotated through small-group sessions dedicated to each HTN topic. We developed pre-, immediate post-, and 8 weeks postcurriculum surveys assessing residents' confidence and desire for future training in the four topics (4-point Likert scales), and multiple-choice quizzes to assess changes in knowledge. We used repeated-measures analysis of variance to compare means between time points for surveys and quizzes.

Results: A total of 112 Internal Medicine residents participated in the curriculum. The mean confidence scores for all four topics increased from 1.79 to 2.61 precurriculum to 2.90 to 3.45 immediately postcurriculum (all P < 0.001) and remained higher (2.53-3.18) than precurriculum at 8 weeks postcurriculum (all P < 0.02). The mean desire for future training scores decreased from 2.74 to 2.96 precurriculum to 2.06 to 2.36 immediately postcurriculum (all P < 0.001 except for managing HTN in patients who are or may become pregnant, which was P = 0.17) and remained lower (2.08-2.36) than precurriculum at 8 weeks postcurriculum (all P ≤ 0.003). The mean knowledge score increased from 48% precurriculum to 62% immediate postcurriculum (P < 0.001) and remained higher (55%) than precurriculum at 8 weeks postcurriculum (P = 0.015).

Conclusions: A curriculum on advanced HTN topics produced durable gains in confidence and knowledge and partially satisfied the desire for future learning among Internal Medicine residents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为内科住院医生开设的高血压高级专题课程。
目标:高血压(HTN)影响着近一半的美国成年人。我们的多机构调查显示,内科住院医师对高血压的高级课题缺乏熟练掌握。方法:高血压专家讲授四个高血压高级课题:进行继发性高血压检查、管理慢性肾病患者的高血压、管理妊娠或可能妊娠患者的高血压,以及管理门诊环境中的高血压急症(严重无症状高血压)。课程设置为半天的门诊教育,住院医师在此期间轮流参加专门针对每个高血压专题的小组会议。我们制定了课程前、课程刚结束时和课程结束 8 周后的调查表,评估住院医师对四个主题的信心和对未来培训的渴望(4 点李克特量表),以及多项选择测验,以评估知识的变化。我们使用重复测量方差分析来比较调查和测验的时间点之间的平均值:共有 112 名内科住院医师参加了该课程。所有四个主题的平均信心分数从课程前的 1.79 分到 2.61 分增加到课程后的 2.90 分到 3.45 分(所有 P 均小于 0.001),并且在课程后 8 周仍高于课程前(2.53-3.18)(所有 P 均小于 0.02)。未来培训愿望的平均得分从课程前的 2.74 分至 2.96 分降至课程后的 2.06 分至 2.36 分(除管理妊娠或可能妊娠患者的高血压外,所有 P 均小于 0.001,P = 0.17),课程后 8 周仍低于课程前(2.08-2.36)(所有 P 均小于 0.003)。平均知识得分从课程前的 48% 上升到课程后的 62%(P < 0.001),课程后 8 周仍高于课程前(55%)(P = 0.015):结论:关于高血压和冠心病高级课题的课程可使内科住院医师在信心和知识方面获得持久的提高,并部分满足了他们对未来学习的渴望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
期刊最新文献
A Qualitative Study of Transportation-Related Barriers to HIV Care in South Carolina. Association of Socioeconomic Variables with Primary Cesarean Section. Exploring Bias in Health Care: Using Art to Facilitate a Narrative Medicine Approach among Third-Year Medical Students. Fit Testing Failure of Reprocessed "Duckbill"-Type N95 Masks. Improving Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Control with a Dedicated Patient Navigator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1