Mid-term Waitlist and Posttransplant Outcomes With Hepatitis C-positive Donor Hearts.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000005193
Yeahwa Hong, Caitlin D Couper, Nidhi Iyanna, Nicholas R Hess, Luke A Ziegler, Mohamed Abdullah, Michael A Mathier, Gavin W Hickey, Mary E Keebler, Scott C Silvestry, David Kaczorowski
{"title":"Mid-term Waitlist and Posttransplant Outcomes With Hepatitis C-positive Donor Hearts.","authors":"Yeahwa Hong, Caitlin D Couper, Nidhi Iyanna, Nicholas R Hess, Luke A Ziegler, Mohamed Abdullah, Michael A Mathier, Gavin W Hickey, Mary E Keebler, Scott C Silvestry, David Kaczorowski","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluates the clinical trends and impact of hepatitis C virus-positive (HCV+) donors on waitlist and posttransplant outcomes after heart transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried to identify adult waitlisted and transplanted patients from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2022. In the waitlist analysis, the candidates were stratified into 2 cohorts based on whether they were willing to accept HCV+ donor offers. Waitlist outcomes included 1-y cumulative incidences of transplantation and death/delisting. In the posttransplant analysis, the recipients were stratified into 2 cohorts with and without HCV nucleic acid test (NAT)-positive donors. Outcomes included 1- and 4-y posttransplant survival. Propensity score-matching was performed. Risk adjustment was performed using multivariable Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, the number of centers using HCV NAT+ donors increased from 1 to 65 centers, along with the number of transplants. In the waitlist analysis, 26 648 waitlisted candidates were analyzed, and 4535 candidates (17%) were approved to accept HCV+ donors. Approval to accept HCV+ donors was associated with a higher likelihood of transplantation and a lower likelihood of death/delisting within 1 y of waitlisting. In the posttransplant analysis, 21 131 recipients were analyzed, and 997 recipients (4.7%) received HCV NAT+ hearts. The 1- and 4-y posttransplant survival were comparable between the recipients of HCV NAT+ and NAT- donors. Furthermore, the similar 1- and 4-y posttransplant survival persisted in the propensity score-matched comparison and multivariable Cox regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Utilization of HCV+ donors is rising. Heart transplants using HCV+ donors are associated with improved waitlist and comparable posttransplant outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005193","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates the clinical trends and impact of hepatitis C virus-positive (HCV+) donors on waitlist and posttransplant outcomes after heart transplantation.

Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried to identify adult waitlisted and transplanted patients from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2022. In the waitlist analysis, the candidates were stratified into 2 cohorts based on whether they were willing to accept HCV+ donor offers. Waitlist outcomes included 1-y cumulative incidences of transplantation and death/delisting. In the posttransplant analysis, the recipients were stratified into 2 cohorts with and without HCV nucleic acid test (NAT)-positive donors. Outcomes included 1- and 4-y posttransplant survival. Propensity score-matching was performed. Risk adjustment was performed using multivariable Cox regression.

Results: During the study period, the number of centers using HCV NAT+ donors increased from 1 to 65 centers, along with the number of transplants. In the waitlist analysis, 26 648 waitlisted candidates were analyzed, and 4535 candidates (17%) were approved to accept HCV+ donors. Approval to accept HCV+ donors was associated with a higher likelihood of transplantation and a lower likelihood of death/delisting within 1 y of waitlisting. In the posttransplant analysis, 21 131 recipients were analyzed, and 997 recipients (4.7%) received HCV NAT+ hearts. The 1- and 4-y posttransplant survival were comparable between the recipients of HCV NAT+ and NAT- donors. Furthermore, the similar 1- and 4-y posttransplant survival persisted in the propensity score-matched comparison and multivariable Cox regression analysis.

Conclusions: Utilization of HCV+ donors is rising. Heart transplants using HCV+ donors are associated with improved waitlist and comparable posttransplant outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丙型肝炎阳性捐献心脏的中期等待和移植后结果
背景:本研究评估了丙型肝炎病毒阳性(HCV+)供体的临床趋势及其对心脏移植候选名单和移植后结果的影响:本研究评估了丙型肝炎病毒阳性(HCV+)供体的临床趋势及其对心脏移植候选名单和移植后预后的影响:方法:我们查询了器官共享联合网络注册表,以确定从 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间等待移植和移植的成年患者。在候选名单分析中,根据候选者是否愿意接受HCV+供体,将其分为两个队列。候选结果包括移植和死亡/除名的1年累计发生率。在移植后分析中,受者被分为HCV核酸检测(NAT)阳性捐献者和非HCV核酸检测(NAT)阳性捐献者两组。结果包括移植后1年和4年的存活率。进行了倾向评分匹配。采用多变量考克斯回归法进行风险调整:在研究期间,使用HCV NAT+供体的中心从1个增加到65个,移植数量也随之增加。在候选名单分析中,对 26 648 名候选者进行了分析,有 4535 名候选者(17%)获准接受 HCV+ 供体。获准接受HCV+供体与较高的移植可能性和较低的候选名单内死亡/除名可能性有关。在移植后分析中,对 21 131 名受者进行了分析,997 名受者(4.7%)接受了 HCV NAT+ 心脏。接受HCV NAT+和NAT-供体的受者在移植后1年和4年的存活率相当。此外,在倾向得分匹配比较和多变量考克斯回归分析中,移植后1年和4年的存活率仍然相似:结论:HCV+供体的使用率正在上升。结论:HCV+捐献者的使用率正在上升,使用HCV+捐献者进行心脏移植可改善候选结果和相似的移植后结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation
Transplantation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.30%
发文量
1906
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of The Transplantation Society, and the International Liver Transplantation Society, Transplantation is published monthly and is the most cited and influential journal in the field, with more than 25,000 citations per year. Transplantation has been the trusted source for extensive and timely coverage of the most important advances in transplantation for over 50 years. The Editors and Editorial Board are an international group of research and clinical leaders that includes many pioneers of the field, representing a diverse range of areas of expertise. This capable editorial team provides thoughtful and thorough peer review, and delivers rapid, careful and insightful editorial evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to the journal. Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The journal remains competitive with a time to first decision of fewer than 21 days. Transplantation was the first in the field to offer CME credit to its peer reviewers for reviews completed. The journal publishes original research articles in original clinical science and original basic science. Short reports bring attention to research at the forefront of the field. Other areas covered include cell therapy and islet transplantation, immunobiology and genomics, and xenotransplantation. ​
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Indeterminate QuantiFERON Assay Results in Solid Organ Transplant Candidates and Proposed Management Algorithm. Targeted Broader Sharing for Liver Continuous Distribution. Characterization of Baseline Lung Allograft Dysfunction in Single Lung Transplant Recipients. Direct Measurement of DCD Donor Potential. The Impact of HLA-DQαβ Heterodimer Mismatch on Living Donor Kidney Allograft Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1