Distinguishing Therapeutic Misconception from Religious Belief.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Southern Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001727
Nicholas Covaleski
{"title":"Distinguishing Therapeutic Misconception from Religious Belief.","authors":"Nicholas Covaleski","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the context of early-phase clinical trials, research subjects often confuse the differences between clinical research and personal treatment. This phenomenon, known as therapeutic misconception, potentially undermines the validity of informed consent. Several interventions have been proposed to help mitigate therapeutic misconception, although few have considered the role of religious belief. This is a notable omission, given that an association between therapeutic misconception and religious belief has been shown to exist. This perspective calls for more research into the nature of the association between therapeutic misconception and religious belief and suggests a framework that may help clinicians and researchers distinguish between the two, thereby bolstering the informed consent process.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"117 9","pages":"567-569"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001727","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of early-phase clinical trials, research subjects often confuse the differences between clinical research and personal treatment. This phenomenon, known as therapeutic misconception, potentially undermines the validity of informed consent. Several interventions have been proposed to help mitigate therapeutic misconception, although few have considered the role of religious belief. This is a notable omission, given that an association between therapeutic misconception and religious belief has been shown to exist. This perspective calls for more research into the nature of the association between therapeutic misconception and religious belief and suggests a framework that may help clinicians and researchers distinguish between the two, thereby bolstering the informed consent process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区分治疗误区与宗教信仰。
在早期临床试验中,研究对象常常混淆临床研究与个人治疗之间的区别。这种现象被称为治疗误解,有可能损害知情同意的有效性。已经提出了一些干预措施来帮助减轻治疗误解,但很少有人考虑过宗教信仰的作用。鉴于治疗误解与宗教信仰之间存在关联,这是一个值得注意的疏忽。这一观点呼吁对治疗误解与宗教信仰之间关联的性质进行更多研究,并提出了一个框架,可帮助临床医生和研究人员区分两者,从而加强知情同意程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
期刊最新文献
Factors Affecting Physician Exit and Reentry into Medicine. Increased Rate of Vaginal Adhesion in Hematologic Cancer Survivors after Vaginal Prolapse Surgery. Gender-Based Differences in Mental Health Outcomes Following Breast Surgery: Insights from Epic Cosmos. Relationship between the Prevalence of Syphilis and COVID-19 in Lubbock County and Texas. Genomics and Personalized Medicine: The DNA Revolution Reshaping Patient Care by 2035.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1