Strengthening the planning and design of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health SA Gesondheid Pub Date : 2024-08-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2693
Thandolwakhe Nyangeni, Wilma Ten Ham-Baloyi, Dalena R M van Rooyen
{"title":"Strengthening the planning and design of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations.","authors":"Thandolwakhe Nyangeni, Wilma Ten Ham-Baloyi, Dalena R M van Rooyen","doi":"10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) offer innovative, objective, and fair methods of clinical assessment, their quality is compromised by poor planning and design.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to describe the development and present evidence-based recommendations on strengthening the planning and design of OSCEs for a South African public College of Nursing.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A South African public College of Nursing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Recommendations were developed based on synthesising two sets of qualitative data. Set 1 included two main themes with each of the four sub-themes related to barriers and facilitators towards quality in OSCE designs from 14 nurse educator interviews and 15 external moderator reports. Set 2 included 12 quality measures to be adopted in the quality design of OSCEs derived from an integrative literature review. The draft recommendations were reviewed by eight experts to be finalised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven recommendations were developed for strengthening OSCEs' planning and design, related to: (1) policy framework, standard operating procedures and stakeholder code of conduct; (2) blueprinting and mapping of the OSCE content; (3) developing a bank of OSCE stations; (4) scoring rubric and standard-setting method selection; (5) examiners and standardised patients' recruitment and training; (6) venue selection; and (7) station piloting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The seven developed recommendations can strengthen the quality of OSCEs in the South African public College of Nursing context.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The developed recommendations can assist nurse educators in planning and designing to conduct quality OSCEs following piloting and implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":45721,"journal":{"name":"Health SA Gesondheid","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11369580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health SA Gesondheid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) offer innovative, objective, and fair methods of clinical assessment, their quality is compromised by poor planning and design.

Aim: This study aimed to describe the development and present evidence-based recommendations on strengthening the planning and design of OSCEs for a South African public College of Nursing.

Setting: A South African public College of Nursing.

Methods: Recommendations were developed based on synthesising two sets of qualitative data. Set 1 included two main themes with each of the four sub-themes related to barriers and facilitators towards quality in OSCE designs from 14 nurse educator interviews and 15 external moderator reports. Set 2 included 12 quality measures to be adopted in the quality design of OSCEs derived from an integrative literature review. The draft recommendations were reviewed by eight experts to be finalised.

Results: Seven recommendations were developed for strengthening OSCEs' planning and design, related to: (1) policy framework, standard operating procedures and stakeholder code of conduct; (2) blueprinting and mapping of the OSCE content; (3) developing a bank of OSCE stations; (4) scoring rubric and standard-setting method selection; (5) examiners and standardised patients' recruitment and training; (6) venue selection; and (7) station piloting.

Conclusion: The seven developed recommendations can strengthen the quality of OSCEs in the South African public College of Nursing context.

Contribution: The developed recommendations can assist nurse educators in planning and designing to conduct quality OSCEs following piloting and implementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强客观结构化临床考试的规划和设计。
背景:尽管客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)提供了创新、客观和公平的临床评估方法,但其质量却因规划和设计不当而大打折扣。目的:本研究旨在描述南非一所公立护理学院OSCE的发展情况,并就如何加强OSCE的规划和设计提出循证建议:环境:南非一所公立护理学院:方法:在综合两组定性数据的基础上提出建议。第 1 组包括两个主题和四个次主题,每个主题都与提高 OSCE 设计质量的障碍和促进因素有关,这些主题来自 14 次护士教育者访谈和 15 份外部主持人报告。第 2 组包括根据综合文献综述得出的 OSCE 质量设计中应采用的 12 项质量措施。八位专家对建议草案进行了审查,并最终定稿:结果:为加强开放式学业水平考试的规划和设计提出了七项建议,分别涉及(1) 政策框架、标准操作程序和利益相关者行为准则;(2) OSCE 内容的蓝图和地图绘制;(3) 开发 OSCE 站点库;(4) 评分标准和标准制定方法的选择;(5) 考官和标准化病人的招募和培训;(6) 场地选择;以及 (7) 站点试点:结论:所提出的七项建议可以提高南非公立护理学院 OSCE 的质量:贡献:这些建议有助于护士教育者在试点和实施后规划和设计高质量的 OSCE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health SA Gesondheid
Health SA Gesondheid HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
77
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Challenges related to the implementation of the CCMDD programme in Sekhukhune clinics. Perceptions of the MDT towards the health needs and support for grandparents caring for AIDS orphans. Professional nurses' perspectives of an ideal performance management process. Adolescent girls' sexual and reproductive health information needs and barriers in Cape Town. Experiences of nurses studying towards post-basic qualifications during COVID-19 in KwaZulu-Natal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1