Community-centred disaster recovery: A call to change the narrative.

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Disasters Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1111/disa.12655
David Sanderson, Tim Heffernan, Marco DeSisto, Clifford Shearing
{"title":"Community-centred disaster recovery: A call to change the narrative.","authors":"David Sanderson, Tim Heffernan, Marco DeSisto, Clifford Shearing","doi":"10.1111/disa.12655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper challenges current approaches to undertaking community-centred disaster recovery. Community-centred approaches are widely recognised as 'the gold standard' for effective recovery from disasters. Yet, they are rarely applied well enough in practice. Challenges include the 'authority' culture of command-and-control agencies, the emphasis on discrete recovery time frames, and the reluctance to relinquish centralised control. The paper focuses on people's experiences of community-centred recovery in New South Wales, Australia, which has experienced severe fires and floods since 2019. We undertook key informant interviews and an online survey to inquire into how community-centred recovery is enacted. Our work uncovered widespread dissatisfaction with current practices. The paper discusses key themes emerging from the research and ends with a call to change how community-centred recovery is framed and conducted by responding organisations, to include the underlying causes of vulnerability in recovery, to measure success differently, and to alter the narrative of who 'owns' disasters.</p>","PeriodicalId":48088,"journal":{"name":"Disasters","volume":" ","pages":"e12655"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disasters","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12655","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper challenges current approaches to undertaking community-centred disaster recovery. Community-centred approaches are widely recognised as 'the gold standard' for effective recovery from disasters. Yet, they are rarely applied well enough in practice. Challenges include the 'authority' culture of command-and-control agencies, the emphasis on discrete recovery time frames, and the reluctance to relinquish centralised control. The paper focuses on people's experiences of community-centred recovery in New South Wales, Australia, which has experienced severe fires and floods since 2019. We undertook key informant interviews and an online survey to inquire into how community-centred recovery is enacted. Our work uncovered widespread dissatisfaction with current practices. The paper discusses key themes emerging from the research and ends with a call to change how community-centred recovery is framed and conducted by responding organisations, to include the underlying causes of vulnerability in recovery, to measure success differently, and to alter the narrative of who 'owns' disasters.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以社区为中心的灾后恢复:呼吁改变说法。
本文对当前以社区为中心的灾后恢复方法提出了挑战。以社区为中心的方法被广泛认为是灾后有效恢复的 "黄金标准"。然而,这些方法在实践中却很少得到很好的应用。所面临的挑战包括指挥和控制机构的 "权威 "文化、对离散恢复时间框架的强调以及不愿放弃集中控制。澳大利亚新南威尔士州自 2019 年以来经历了严重的火灾和洪灾,本文重点介绍了该州人们以社区为中心的灾后恢复经验。我们进行了关键信息提供者访谈和在线调查,以了解以社区为中心的恢复是如何实施的。我们的工作发现了人们对当前做法的普遍不满。本文讨论了研究中出现的关键主题,最后呼吁救灾组织改变以社区为中心的恢复方式,将脆弱性的根本原因纳入恢复工作中,以不同的方式衡量成功与否,并改变灾难 "归谁所有 "的说法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disasters
Disasters Multiple-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Disasters is a major, peer-reviewed quarterly journal reporting on all aspects of disaster studies, policy and management. It provides a forum for academics, policymakers and practitioners to publish high-quality research and practice concerning natural catastrophes, anthropogenic disasters, complex political emergencies and protracted crises around the world. The journal promotes the interchange of ideas and experience, maintaining a balance between field reports, case study articles of general interest and academic papers. Disasters: Is the leading journal in the field of disasters, protracted crises and complex emergencies Influences disaster prevention, mitigation and response policies and practices Adopts a world-wide geographical perspective Contains a mix of academic papers and field studies Promotes the interchange of ideas between practitioners, policy-makers and academics.
期刊最新文献
Famine and food security: new trends and systems or politics as usual? An introduction. Five levels of famine prevention: towards a framework for the twenty-first century and beyond. Food insecurity, xenophobia, and political legitimacy: exploring the links in post-COVID-19 South Africa. Food systems in protracted crises: examining indigenous food sovereignty amid de-development in Kashmir. Sudan's catastrophe: the role of changing dynamics of food and power in the Gezira agricultural scheme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1