A Latent Profile Analysis of Religious Parents' Responses to Their Sexual and Gender Diverse Child.

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Homosexuality Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1080/00918369.2024.2398552
Veronica Hanna-Walker, Eva S Lefkowitz, Ryan J Watson
{"title":"A Latent Profile Analysis of Religious Parents' Responses to Their Sexual and Gender Diverse Child.","authors":"Veronica Hanna-Walker, Eva S Lefkowitz, Ryan J Watson","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2024.2398552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior research indicates that religious parents can have negative, positive, or ambivalent responses to their child's sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI). Yet, to our knowledge no research has quantitatively examined patterns of sexual and gender diverse (SGD) youth's perceptions of their religious parents' responses to their SOGI. Without examining variations in these patterns, we are unable to better understand the experiences of SGD youth with religious parents. In the current paper, we examined patterns of SGD youth's perceptions of their religious parents' SOGI-specific rejection, acceptance, and SOGI change efforts. We also examined if these patterns differed by SGD youth's individual and contextual factors. The analytic sample consisted of online responses from 5,686 SGD youth (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 15.95). We found four distinct profiles: <i>Positive Parental Response, Moderate Negative Parental Response, Low Parental Response</i>, and <i>High Negative Parental Response</i>. The largest profile was the <i>Positive Parental Response</i>, suggesting that many SGD youth perceived positive responses from their religious parents. SGD youth with diverse gender identities and intersecting identities, such as race/ethnicity, were more vulnerable to religious parents' negative responses. Findings have implications for existing resources and programs aimed at strengthening SGD youth's relationship with their religious parents.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2024.2398552","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior research indicates that religious parents can have negative, positive, or ambivalent responses to their child's sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI). Yet, to our knowledge no research has quantitatively examined patterns of sexual and gender diverse (SGD) youth's perceptions of their religious parents' responses to their SOGI. Without examining variations in these patterns, we are unable to better understand the experiences of SGD youth with religious parents. In the current paper, we examined patterns of SGD youth's perceptions of their religious parents' SOGI-specific rejection, acceptance, and SOGI change efforts. We also examined if these patterns differed by SGD youth's individual and contextual factors. The analytic sample consisted of online responses from 5,686 SGD youth (Mage = 15.95). We found four distinct profiles: Positive Parental Response, Moderate Negative Parental Response, Low Parental Response, and High Negative Parental Response. The largest profile was the Positive Parental Response, suggesting that many SGD youth perceived positive responses from their religious parents. SGD youth with diverse gender identities and intersecting identities, such as race/ethnicity, were more vulnerable to religious parents' negative responses. Findings have implications for existing resources and programs aimed at strengthening SGD youth's relationship with their religious parents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教父母对其有不同性倾向和性别的孩子的反应的潜在特征分析。
先前的研究表明,有宗教信仰的父母会对子女的性取向和性别认同(SOGI)做出消极、积极或矛盾的反应。然而,据我们所知,还没有任何研究对不同性取向和性别认同(SGD)青少年对其宗教父母对其性取向和性别认同的反应的看法模式进行定量研究。如果不研究这些模式的变化,我们就无法更好地了解有宗教信仰的父母的 SGD 青少年的经历。在本文中,我们研究了 SGD 青少年对其信教父母拒绝、接受 SGI 以及改变 SGI 所做努力的看法模式。我们还研究了这些模式是否因 SGD 青少年的个人和环境因素而有所不同。分析样本包括 5,686 名 SGD 青少年的在线回复(Mage = 15.95)。我们发现了四种不同的情况:父母的积极反应、父母的中度消极反应、父母的低度反应和父母的高度消极反应。最大的特征是父母的积极回应,这表明许多 SGD 青少年认为他们信教的父母给予了积极回应。具有不同性别身份和交叉身份(如种族/民族)的 SGD 青少年更容易受到宗教父母负面反应的影响。研究结果对旨在加强SGD青少年与宗教父母关系的现有资源和项目具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.
期刊最新文献
Coping Patterns During the COVID-19 Pandemic by Sexual and Gender Identity. "Dancing Steps of #WeToo Resistance": Choreography of Masculinity, Sexuality, and Violence on an Israeli Stage. Sexual Diversity Bullying and Cyberbullying Questionnaires: An Inclusive Approach to Measure Sexuality-Based Bullying. Self-Disclosure of Loneliness by LGBTQ+ Twitter Users During COVID-19. From the Margins to the Mainstream: Explicating and Validating Queer Readings Among Sexual Minority Youth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1