Neonatal Anthropometric Measurements: A Comparison of Neonates With 3-T Fetal MRI Exposure, With 1.5-T Fetal MRI Exposure, and Without In-Utero MRI Exposure.
Enrico Danzer, Valeria Peña-Trujillo, Sebastian Gallo-Bernal, Michael S Gee, Teresa Victoria
{"title":"Neonatal Anthropometric Measurements: A Comparison of Neonates With 3-T Fetal MRI Exposure, With 1.5-T Fetal MRI Exposure, and Without In-Utero MRI Exposure.","authors":"Enrico Danzer, Valeria Peña-Trujillo, Sebastian Gallo-Bernal, Michael S Gee, Teresa Victoria","doi":"10.2214/AJR.24.31647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Fetal MRI is increasingly performed at 3 T. Nonetheless, safety concerns persist regarding potential increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction from in-utero 3-T MRI exposure. <b>Objective:</b> To compare neonatal anthropometric measurements between newborns who underwent 3-T fetal MRI, newborns who underwent 1.5-T fetal MRI, and newborns without in utero MRI exposure. <b>Methods:</b> This single-center retrospective study included gravid patients who underwent fetal ultrasound and possible 1.5-T or 3-T fetal MRI within 10 days from January 2017 to January 2022. For each included patient who also underwent 3-T fetal MRI, one matched patient who also underwent 1.5-T MRI and two matched patients without in-utero MRI exposure, were randomly selected. Matching was based on gestational age per the fetal ultrasound. Neonatal anthropometric characteristics were compared among groups. <b>Results:</b> The final sample included 416 patients (mean age, 32±5 years), 104 in the 3-T MRI group, 104 in the 1.5-T MRI group, and 208 in the MRI-unexposed group. Mean gestational age at the time of fetal ultrasound used for matching was 27 weeks 2 days in the 3-T group, 25 weeks 2 days in the 1.5-T group, and 26 weeks 0 days in the MRI-unexposed group (p=.07). The distribution of indications for fetal MRI was not significantly different between the 3-T and 1.5-T groups (p=.62). Mean gestational age at delivery was 37 weeks 5 days in the 3-T group, 38 weeks 0 day in the 1.5-T group, and 38 weeks 2 days in the unexposed group (p=.51). No significant difference (p=.09) was observed among groups in mean neonatal weight (3-T: 3120±753 g; 1.5-T: 3104±704 g; unexposed: 2967±614 g); neonatal weight percentile (3-T: 45±27; 1.5-T: 42±26; MRI: 41±24); neonatal head circumference (3-T: 34±3 cm; 1.5-T: 34±3 cm; unexposed: 34±2 cm), or neonatal head circumference percentile (3-T: 48±29; 1.5-T: 42±23; unexposed: 43±30). <b>Conclusion:</b> There were no significant differences in neonatal anthropometric measurements among newborns who underwent in-utero 3-T MRI, newborns who underwent in-utero 1.5-T MRI, and newborns without in-utero MRI exposure. <b>Clinical Impact:</b> The results support the safety of 3-T MRI with respect to growth of the developing fetus.</p>","PeriodicalId":55529,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Roentgenology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Roentgenology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.24.31647","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Fetal MRI is increasingly performed at 3 T. Nonetheless, safety concerns persist regarding potential increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction from in-utero 3-T MRI exposure. Objective: To compare neonatal anthropometric measurements between newborns who underwent 3-T fetal MRI, newborns who underwent 1.5-T fetal MRI, and newborns without in utero MRI exposure. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included gravid patients who underwent fetal ultrasound and possible 1.5-T or 3-T fetal MRI within 10 days from January 2017 to January 2022. For each included patient who also underwent 3-T fetal MRI, one matched patient who also underwent 1.5-T MRI and two matched patients without in-utero MRI exposure, were randomly selected. Matching was based on gestational age per the fetal ultrasound. Neonatal anthropometric characteristics were compared among groups. Results: The final sample included 416 patients (mean age, 32±5 years), 104 in the 3-T MRI group, 104 in the 1.5-T MRI group, and 208 in the MRI-unexposed group. Mean gestational age at the time of fetal ultrasound used for matching was 27 weeks 2 days in the 3-T group, 25 weeks 2 days in the 1.5-T group, and 26 weeks 0 days in the MRI-unexposed group (p=.07). The distribution of indications for fetal MRI was not significantly different between the 3-T and 1.5-T groups (p=.62). Mean gestational age at delivery was 37 weeks 5 days in the 3-T group, 38 weeks 0 day in the 1.5-T group, and 38 weeks 2 days in the unexposed group (p=.51). No significant difference (p=.09) was observed among groups in mean neonatal weight (3-T: 3120±753 g; 1.5-T: 3104±704 g; unexposed: 2967±614 g); neonatal weight percentile (3-T: 45±27; 1.5-T: 42±26; MRI: 41±24); neonatal head circumference (3-T: 34±3 cm; 1.5-T: 34±3 cm; unexposed: 34±2 cm), or neonatal head circumference percentile (3-T: 48±29; 1.5-T: 42±23; unexposed: 43±30). Conclusion: There were no significant differences in neonatal anthropometric measurements among newborns who underwent in-utero 3-T MRI, newborns who underwent in-utero 1.5-T MRI, and newborns without in-utero MRI exposure. Clinical Impact: The results support the safety of 3-T MRI with respect to growth of the developing fetus.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1907, the monthly American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) is the world’s longest continuously published general radiology journal. AJR is recognized as among the specialty’s leading peer-reviewed journals and has a worldwide circulation of close to 25,000. The journal publishes clinically-oriented articles across all radiology subspecialties, seeking relevance to radiologists’ daily practice. The journal publishes hundreds of articles annually with a diverse range of formats, including original research, reviews, clinical perspectives, editorials, and other short reports. The journal engages its audience through a spectrum of social media and digital communication activities.