Impact of three-dimensional imaging and printing on septal myectomy results-single centre's experience.

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivae151
Uladzimir Andrushchuk, Artsem Niavyhlas, Vitali Adzintsou, Dzmitry Tretsiakou, Helena Zakharava, Tatsjana Seuruk, Iraida Ustinava, Svetlana Kurganovich, Viktoryia Aleinikava, Mikalai Shchatsinka, Szymon Kocańda
{"title":"Impact of three-dimensional imaging and printing on septal myectomy results-single centre's experience.","authors":"Uladzimir Andrushchuk, Artsem Niavyhlas, Vitali Adzintsou, Dzmitry Tretsiakou, Helena Zakharava, Tatsjana Seuruk, Iraida Ustinava, Svetlana Kurganovich, Viktoryia Aleinikava, Mikalai Shchatsinka, Szymon Kocańda","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivae151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess changes in the results of septal myectomy (SM) following introduction of three-dimensional (3D) imaging and 3D printing in surgical interventions planning and performing in the single-centre settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2007 and March 2022, 268 consecutive symptomatic patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and peak pressure gradient at obstruction area ≥50 mmHg underwent conventional SM (n = 112) or SM with heart 3D modelling (n = 156).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For comparative analysis, we used propensity score matching (PSM) by 14 variables and there were formed group 1PSM (conventional SM, n = 77) and group 2PSM (3D-modelled SM, n = 77). It was noted for group 2PSM: larger mean resected myocardium mass [10.0 (standard deviation 4.3) vs 5.2 (standard deviation 2.7) g], P < 0.001, no mitral valve replacement cases [0 vs 28 (36.4%), P < 0.001], no iatrogenic ventricular septal defects cases [0 vs 6 (7.8%), P = 0.028], lower rate of major complications [6 (7.8%) vs 17 (22.1%), P = 0.011], smaller residual peak systolic gradient at the obstruction level [7.0 (5.0-9.0) vs 11.0 (7.0-16.0) mmHg, P < 0.001]. During the long-term follow-up, it was noted for group 2PSM as compared to group 1PSM: lower 5-year cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events [3.8% (95% confidence interval 0.7-11.7%) vs 16.9% (9.5-26.1%), P = 0.007] and cardiac-related death [3.8% (95% confidence interval 0.7-11.7%) vs 13% (95% confidence interval 6.6-21.6%), P = 0.05].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SM based on 3D virtual and printed heart models is more effective than conventional SM.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess changes in the results of septal myectomy (SM) following introduction of three-dimensional (3D) imaging and 3D printing in surgical interventions planning and performing in the single-centre settings.

Methods: Between January 2007 and March 2022, 268 consecutive symptomatic patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and peak pressure gradient at obstruction area ≥50 mmHg underwent conventional SM (n = 112) or SM with heart 3D modelling (n = 156).

Results: For comparative analysis, we used propensity score matching (PSM) by 14 variables and there were formed group 1PSM (conventional SM, n = 77) and group 2PSM (3D-modelled SM, n = 77). It was noted for group 2PSM: larger mean resected myocardium mass [10.0 (standard deviation 4.3) vs 5.2 (standard deviation 2.7) g], P < 0.001, no mitral valve replacement cases [0 vs 28 (36.4%), P < 0.001], no iatrogenic ventricular septal defects cases [0 vs 6 (7.8%), P = 0.028], lower rate of major complications [6 (7.8%) vs 17 (22.1%), P = 0.011], smaller residual peak systolic gradient at the obstruction level [7.0 (5.0-9.0) vs 11.0 (7.0-16.0) mmHg, P < 0.001]. During the long-term follow-up, it was noted for group 2PSM as compared to group 1PSM: lower 5-year cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events [3.8% (95% confidence interval 0.7-11.7%) vs 16.9% (9.5-26.1%), P = 0.007] and cardiac-related death [3.8% (95% confidence interval 0.7-11.7%) vs 13% (95% confidence interval 6.6-21.6%), P = 0.05].

Conclusions: SM based on 3D virtual and printed heart models is more effective than conventional SM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三维成像和打印对室间隔肌肉切除术结果的影响--单个中心的经验。
目的评估在单中心环境下,将三维(3D)成像和三维打印技术引入手术干预计划和实施过程后,房间隔肌肉切除术(SM)结果的变化:方法:2007年1月至2022年3月期间,268名肥厚型梗阻性心肌病(HOCM)且梗阻区域压力梯度峰值≥50 mmHg的连续症状患者接受了传统SM(n = 112)或心脏3D建模SM(n = 156):为了进行比较分析,我们根据 14 个变量进行了倾向评分匹配(PSM),并成立了 1PSM 组(传统 SM,n = 77)和 2PSM 组(三维建模 SM,n = 77)。第 2PSM 组:切除的心肌平均质量更大(10.0(标清 4.3)克 vs 5.2(标清 2.7)克),P基于三维虚拟和打印心脏模型的 SM 比传统 SM 更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case of superior trunk brachial plexus injury after right mini-thoracotomy mitral valve repair. Association between preoperative D-dimer with morphologic features and surgical outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection. Defining the causes for Fontan circulatory failure in total cavopulmonary connection patients. Risk of neurologic events after surgery for mitral valve insufficiency and concomitant cox-maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation. A nationwide register-based study. Robotic-enhanced hybrid ablation for inappropriate sinus tachycardia: a world-first approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1