The Relationship between Nutritional Status and Thyroid Function among Adults in the USA: NHANES 2007-2012.

Junru Liu, Xiaofeng Lu, Xiaohui Wang, Jialu Song, Xiaotao Zhu, Huijing Tong, Chaoyang Xu, Jinfang Qian, Xiaogang Zheng, Mingzheng Wang
{"title":"The Relationship between Nutritional Status and Thyroid Function among Adults in the USA: NHANES 2007-2012.","authors":"Junru Liu, Xiaofeng Lu, Xiaohui Wang, Jialu Song, Xiaotao Zhu, Huijing Tong, Chaoyang Xu, Jinfang Qian, Xiaogang Zheng, Mingzheng Wang","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2024-0164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Controlled Nutritional Status (CONUT) scores have been developed as quantitative tools that can be employed to gauge the nutritional status of individual patients. However, there has been very little research investigating the association between these CONUT scores and the function of the thyroid. As such, the present study was designed to address this research gap through the evaluation of a representative cohort of American adults. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data were herein used to separate subjects into those with normal nutritional status (CONUT score: 0-1) from those who were malnourished (CONUT scores > 1). Associations between these CONUT scores and the function of the thyroid were investigated through linear regression modeling, employing weighted analytical strategies and subgroup analyses. Overall, 8,082 individuals from the NHANES 2007-2012 cohort were enrolled in this analysis. These individuals exhibited a weighted mean CONUT score of 0.72 (0.02). 6661 (weighted proportion: 83.12%) in the normal nutritional status group and 1421 (16.88%) in the malnourished group. In adjusted analyses, subjects who were malnourished were found to present with an increase in FT4 levels (β = 0.033; p < 0.001 together with reduced TT3 levels (β = -3.526; p = 0.01). The present data offer evidence in support of higher CONUT scores, which correspond to malnutrition, being related to increases in FT4 levels together with reductions in TT3 levels. More studies will be crucial to further probe the mechanistic drivers of these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":93878,"journal":{"name":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2024-0164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Controlled Nutritional Status (CONUT) scores have been developed as quantitative tools that can be employed to gauge the nutritional status of individual patients. However, there has been very little research investigating the association between these CONUT scores and the function of the thyroid. As such, the present study was designed to address this research gap through the evaluation of a representative cohort of American adults. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data were herein used to separate subjects into those with normal nutritional status (CONUT score: 0-1) from those who were malnourished (CONUT scores > 1). Associations between these CONUT scores and the function of the thyroid were investigated through linear regression modeling, employing weighted analytical strategies and subgroup analyses. Overall, 8,082 individuals from the NHANES 2007-2012 cohort were enrolled in this analysis. These individuals exhibited a weighted mean CONUT score of 0.72 (0.02). 6661 (weighted proportion: 83.12%) in the normal nutritional status group and 1421 (16.88%) in the malnourished group. In adjusted analyses, subjects who were malnourished were found to present with an increase in FT4 levels (β = 0.033; p < 0.001 together with reduced TT3 levels (β = -3.526; p = 0.01). The present data offer evidence in support of higher CONUT scores, which correspond to malnutrition, being related to increases in FT4 levels together with reductions in TT3 levels. More studies will be crucial to further probe the mechanistic drivers of these results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国成年人的营养状况与甲状腺功能之间的关系:2007-2012 年国家健康调查。
受控营养状况(CONUT)评分是一种量化工具,可用于衡量个体患者的营养状况。然而,很少有研究调查这些 CONUT 评分与甲状腺功能之间的关联。因此,本研究旨在通过对一组具有代表性的美国成年人进行评估来填补这一研究空白。本研究利用美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)数据,将受试者分为营养状况正常者(CONUT 评分:0-1)和营养不良者(CONUT 评分大于 1)。通过线性回归模型、加权分析策略和亚组分析,研究了这些 CONUT 分数与甲状腺功能之间的关系。共有8082名来自NHANES 2007-2012队列的人员参与了此次分析。这些人的加权平均 CONUT 得分为 0.72 (0.02)。正常营养状况组有 6661 人(加权比例:83.12%),营养不良组有 1421 人(16.88%)。在调整分析中发现,营养不良受试者的 FT4 水平升高(β = 0.033;p < 0.001),TT3 水平降低(β = -3.526;p = 0.01)。本数据提供的证据支持了较高的 CONUT 分数(与营养不良相对应)与 FT4 水平的升高和 TT3 水平的降低有关。更多的研究对于进一步探究这些结果的机理驱动因素至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eating Traditional Foods Enhances Diet Quality Among First Nations in Canada: An Analysis Using the Healthy Eating Food Index-2019 (HEFI-2019) and the Canadian Healthy Eating Index 2007 (C-HEI 2007). Retinol-binding protein 4 is a potential biomarker of changes in lean mass in postmenopausal women. A narrative review of velocity-based training best practice: The importance of contraction intent vs. movement speed. A reduced carbohydrate diet improves glycemic regulation in hyperglycemic older people in a retirement home: The SAGE study. Feet-heating and Calf-heating have Opposing Effects on Glucose Tolerance and Heart Rate Variability: A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1