Slanted and Standard Lateral Rectus Recession Procedures for Convergence Insufficiency-Type Intermittent Exotropia in Children: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-08-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S471172
Yumi Suzuki, Takafumi Aoki, Akane Tomita, Tadahiro Mitsukawa, Yukiko Hama, Masakazu Yamada
{"title":"Slanted and Standard Lateral Rectus Recession Procedures for Convergence Insufficiency-Type Intermittent Exotropia in Children: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Yumi Suzuki, Takafumi Aoki, Akane Tomita, Tadahiro Mitsukawa, Yukiko Hama, Masakazu Yamada","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S471172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of slanted bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLR-rec) for treating convergence insufficiency-type intermittent exotropia (CI-IXT) in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, 26 patients aged <16 years with CI-IXT who underwent BLR-rec between August 2016 and July 2021 with six months of follow-up data post-surgery were classified into slanted BLR-rec group (n = 14) and standard BLR-rec group (n = 12; equal-length recession of the upper and lower horns of the LR muscle). Surgical outcomes were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the slanted and standard groups, the preoperative distance exodeviation was 27.9 ± 5.5 and 30.8 ± 10.0 prism diopter (PD) (p = 0.63), near exodeviation was 41.1 ± 5.6 and 42.9 ± 9.2 PD (p = 0.75), and difference between near and distance deviation (N-D deviation difference) was 13.2 ± 3.2 and 12.1 ± 3.3 PD (p = 0.30), respectively. The ratio of postoperative and preoperative N-D deviation difference was compared between the slanted BLR and standard BLR groups at six months postoperatively. The results revealed that the ratio for slanted-BLR was 0.44 ± 0.19, and for standard-BLR was 0.84 ± 0.24. In the standard group, stereoacuity remained unchanged post-surgery compared to that pre-surgery, while the slanted group showed significant improvement (p < 0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with the standard BLR-rec procedure, the slanted BLR-rec procedure reduced N-D deviation differences in CI-IXT, positively impacting gross stereopsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S471172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of slanted bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLR-rec) for treating convergence insufficiency-type intermittent exotropia (CI-IXT) in children.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 26 patients aged <16 years with CI-IXT who underwent BLR-rec between August 2016 and July 2021 with six months of follow-up data post-surgery were classified into slanted BLR-rec group (n = 14) and standard BLR-rec group (n = 12; equal-length recession of the upper and lower horns of the LR muscle). Surgical outcomes were compared between the groups.

Results: In the slanted and standard groups, the preoperative distance exodeviation was 27.9 ± 5.5 and 30.8 ± 10.0 prism diopter (PD) (p = 0.63), near exodeviation was 41.1 ± 5.6 and 42.9 ± 9.2 PD (p = 0.75), and difference between near and distance deviation (N-D deviation difference) was 13.2 ± 3.2 and 12.1 ± 3.3 PD (p = 0.30), respectively. The ratio of postoperative and preoperative N-D deviation difference was compared between the slanted BLR and standard BLR groups at six months postoperatively. The results revealed that the ratio for slanted-BLR was 0.44 ± 0.19, and for standard-BLR was 0.84 ± 0.24. In the standard group, stereoacuity remained unchanged post-surgery compared to that pre-surgery, while the slanted group showed significant improvement (p < 0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

Conclusion: Compared with the standard BLR-rec procedure, the slanted BLR-rec procedure reduced N-D deviation differences in CI-IXT, positively impacting gross stereopsis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斜侧和标准侧直肌后退术治疗儿童辐辏不全型间歇性外斜:回顾性队列研究
目的:评估斜行双侧直肌外侧后缩(BLR-rec)治疗儿童辐辏不全型间歇性外斜(CI-IXT)的有效性和安全性:在这项回顾性队列研究中,26 名患者的年龄为 5 岁:在斜视组和标准组中,术前距离外差分别为(27.9 ± 5.5)和(30.8 ± 10.0)屈光度(PD)(P = 0.63),近距离外差分别为(41.1 ± 5.6)和(42.9 ± 9.2)屈光度(P = 0.75),近距离偏差和距离偏差(N-D偏差差)分别为(13.2 ± 3.2)和(12.1 ± 3.3)屈光度(P = 0.30)。术后 6 个月,比较了斜面 BLR 组和标准 BLR 组术后与术前 N-D 偏差差值的比值。结果显示,斜视 BLR 组的比值为 0.44 ± 0.19,标准 BLR 组的比值为 0.84 ± 0.24。在标准组中,术后立体视力与术前相比没有变化,而斜视组则有显著改善(P < 0.05,Wilcoxon符号秩检验):结论:与标准 BLR-rec 程序相比,斜面 BLR-rec 程序减少了 CI-IXT 的 N-D 偏差差异,对粗立体视有积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ocular Surface Disease and Dry Eye Severity in Glaucoma Patients at Urban Private Eye Care Centres in Malaysia. Association Between Particulate Matter Pollutants and Ophthalmology Visits for Ocular Surface Irritation and Allergy. The Cutting Efficiency of a Hybrid Phacoemulsification Tip Using High and Low Intraocular Pressure Settings in Different Grades of Cataract. Comparison of Large Language Models in Diagnosis and Management of Challenging Clinical Cases. Enhancing OCT Reliability: The Role of Eye-Tracking in Achieving Consistent Retinal Measurements [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1