Serologic screening for viral infections among blood donors: a study in a blood bank in southern Brazil.

Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) Pub Date : 2024-09-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.20240452
Gabriella Shinmi Belanda, Mariana Fardin, Thelma Larocca Skare, Claudia Alexandra Pontes Ivantes, Karla Braga Fávero, Paulo Tadeu Rodrigues Alemida, Mateus Oliveiro de Almeida, Renato Nisihara
{"title":"Serologic screening for viral infections among blood donors: a study in a blood bank in southern Brazil.","authors":"Gabriella Shinmi Belanda, Mariana Fardin, Thelma Larocca Skare, Claudia Alexandra Pontes Ivantes, Karla Braga Fávero, Paulo Tadeu Rodrigues Alemida, Mateus Oliveiro de Almeida, Renato Nisihara","doi":"10.1590/1806-9282.20240452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Routine screening for viral infections at blood donation is important to avoid transfusion-transmitted infections. It also offers an opportunity to detect an asymptomatic infection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study changes in serology positivity for viral infections (B and C hepatitis, HTLV-1/2, and HIV) at blood donation in a blood bank from Southern Brazil, comparing two periods of 5 years: the period from 2013 to 2017 with the period from 2018 to 2022. In addition, data on the donor fidelity rate during the studied period were sought.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study using data from 2013 to 2022 from a single blood center electronic database from Curitiba, Southern Brazil.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant drop in positive serology for all studied viruses was observed: highest in HIV (OR=0.39; 95% CI=0.27-0.57) and lowest in total anti HBc (0.56; 95 CI=0.50-0.63). Anti HBc serology became more commonly seen in women in the period of 2018-2022 when compared to men. No changes in the distribution of positive serology according to donors' ages were observed. Loyalty rates had a median of 70%, with the lowest being 60% in 2013, while the highest was 73% in 2018 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A significant reduction in discarded blood bags due to viral serology was observed when the period of 2013-2017 was compared to 2018-2022 on this blood bank; the highest reduction was observed in HIV serology and the lowest in HBc serology, which became more common in women in the second period. High rates of donor fidelity were observed during the period studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":94194,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20240452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Routine screening for viral infections at blood donation is important to avoid transfusion-transmitted infections. It also offers an opportunity to detect an asymptomatic infection.

Objective: To study changes in serology positivity for viral infections (B and C hepatitis, HTLV-1/2, and HIV) at blood donation in a blood bank from Southern Brazil, comparing two periods of 5 years: the period from 2013 to 2017 with the period from 2018 to 2022. In addition, data on the donor fidelity rate during the studied period were sought.

Methods: Retrospective study using data from 2013 to 2022 from a single blood center electronic database from Curitiba, Southern Brazil.

Results: A significant drop in positive serology for all studied viruses was observed: highest in HIV (OR=0.39; 95% CI=0.27-0.57) and lowest in total anti HBc (0.56; 95 CI=0.50-0.63). Anti HBc serology became more commonly seen in women in the period of 2018-2022 when compared to men. No changes in the distribution of positive serology according to donors' ages were observed. Loyalty rates had a median of 70%, with the lowest being 60% in 2013, while the highest was 73% in 2018 and 2022.

Conclusion: A significant reduction in discarded blood bags due to viral serology was observed when the period of 2013-2017 was compared to 2018-2022 on this blood bank; the highest reduction was observed in HIV serology and the lowest in HBc serology, which became more common in women in the second period. High rates of donor fidelity were observed during the period studied.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
献血者病毒感染血清学筛查:巴西南部一家血库的研究。
背景:献血时进行常规病毒感染筛查对于避免输血传播感染非常重要。目的:研究献血者病毒感染(乙型和丙型肝炎、HTLV-1)血清学阳性率的变化:研究巴西南部一家血库献血时病毒感染(乙型和丙型肝炎、HTLV-1/2 和 HIV)血清学阳性率的变化,比较 2013 年至 2017 年和 2018 年至 2022 年这两个 5 年期。此外,还寻求研究期间献血者忠实率的数据:回顾性研究使用巴西南部库里蒂巴一个血液中心电子数据库中 2013 年至 2022 年的数据:结果:所有研究病毒血清学阳性率均明显下降:HIV 阳性率最高(OR=0.39;95% CI=0.27-0.57),总抗 HBc 阳性率最低(0.56;95 CI=0.50-0.63)。与男性相比,2018-2022年期间,抗HBc血清学检测更常见于女性。根据捐献者的年龄,阳性血清的分布没有变化。忠诚度中位数为 70%,2013 年最低为 60%,2018 年和 2022 年最高为 73%:2013-2017年与2018-2022年相比,该血库因病毒血清学检测而废弃的血袋明显减少;HIV血清学检测的减少率最高,HBc血清学检测的减少率最低,在第二个时期,女性的HBc血清学检测更为常见。在研究期间,观察到献血者的忠诚度很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Progesterone receptor B over progesterone receptor A prevents recurrence in bilateral endometriomas. Robotic sentinel lymph node dissection experiences in endometrial cancer at our tertiary cancer treatment institution. Summer versus winter: the impact of the seasons on oocyte quality in in vitro fertilization cycles. The effects of trastuzumab therapy on endothelial functions of breast cancer patients. The Glasgow prognosis score is unsuitable for stroke prediction in infectious endocarditis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1