Safety and effectiveness of additional triamcinolone acetonide with endoscopic radial incision and cutting for benign stenosis of the lower gastrointestinal tract: A pilot study

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY DEN open Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70002
Rintaro Moroi, Kotaro Nochioka, Satoshi Miyata, Hideya Iwaki, Hirofumi Chiba, Hiroshi Nagai, Yusuke Shimoyama, Takeo Naito, Hisashi Shiga, Masaki Tosa, Yoichi Kakuta, Shoichi Kayaba, Seiichi Takahashi, Yoshitaka Kinouchi, Atsushi Masamune
{"title":"Safety and effectiveness of additional triamcinolone acetonide with endoscopic radial incision and cutting for benign stenosis of the lower gastrointestinal tract: A pilot study","authors":"Rintaro Moroi,&nbsp;Kotaro Nochioka,&nbsp;Satoshi Miyata,&nbsp;Hideya Iwaki,&nbsp;Hirofumi Chiba,&nbsp;Hiroshi Nagai,&nbsp;Yusuke Shimoyama,&nbsp;Takeo Naito,&nbsp;Hisashi Shiga,&nbsp;Masaki Tosa,&nbsp;Yoichi Kakuta,&nbsp;Shoichi Kayaba,&nbsp;Seiichi Takahashi,&nbsp;Yoshitaka Kinouchi,&nbsp;Atsushi Masamune","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Radial incision and cutting (RIC) is being investigated as an alternative endoscopic dilation method for lower intestinal tract stenosis, providing a high technical success rate and improving subjective symptoms. However, several patients develop re-stenosis following RIC. In this pilot study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) addition after RIC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>RIC with TA was performed in 20 patients with lower gastrointestinal tract stenosis. We evaluated the rate of adverse events 2 months after RIC with TA. We investigated the short- and long-term prognoses, as well as the improvement in subjective symptoms, using a visual analog scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The delayed bleeding rate after RIC was 23.8%. Endoscopic hemostasis was achieved in all patients with delayed bleeding. No perforations were observed. The cumulative re-stenosis-free, re-intervention-free, and surgery-free rates 1 year after RIC were 52.9%, 63.7%, and 85.2%, respectively. Subjective symptoms, including abdominal pain, abdominal bloating, nausea, and dyschezia, significantly improved after RIC with TA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Although additional TA administration after RIC could be safe, additional TA may not be effective on luminal patency after dilation. Further investigation is warranted.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11369793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Radial incision and cutting (RIC) is being investigated as an alternative endoscopic dilation method for lower intestinal tract stenosis, providing a high technical success rate and improving subjective symptoms. However, several patients develop re-stenosis following RIC. In this pilot study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) addition after RIC.

Methods

RIC with TA was performed in 20 patients with lower gastrointestinal tract stenosis. We evaluated the rate of adverse events 2 months after RIC with TA. We investigated the short- and long-term prognoses, as well as the improvement in subjective symptoms, using a visual analog scale.

Results

The delayed bleeding rate after RIC was 23.8%. Endoscopic hemostasis was achieved in all patients with delayed bleeding. No perforations were observed. The cumulative re-stenosis-free, re-intervention-free, and surgery-free rates 1 year after RIC were 52.9%, 63.7%, and 85.2%, respectively. Subjective symptoms, including abdominal pain, abdominal bloating, nausea, and dyschezia, significantly improved after RIC with TA.

Conclusion

Although additional TA administration after RIC could be safe, additional TA may not be effective on luminal patency after dilation. Further investigation is warranted.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下消化道良性狭窄的内镜径向切开术中追加曲安奈德的安全性和有效性:一项试点研究。
目的:桡骨切开术(RIC)是目前研究的一种治疗下肠道狭窄的替代性内窥镜扩张方法,具有较高的技术成功率,并能改善主观症状。然而,一些患者在 RIC 术后会出现再次狭窄。在这项试验性研究中,我们旨在评估在 RIC 后加用曲安奈德(TA)的安全性和有效性:方法:对20名下消化道狭窄患者进行了RIC加TA治疗。我们评估了RIC加用TA后2个月的不良反应发生率。我们使用视觉模拟量表调查了短期和长期预后,以及主观症状的改善情况:结果:RIC术后延迟出血率为23.8%。结果:RIC术后延迟出血率为23.8%,所有延迟出血患者均在内镜下止血。未观察到穿孔。RIC术后1年的累计无再狭窄率、无再介入率和无手术率分别为52.9%、63.7%和85.2%。使用TA进行RIC后,腹痛、腹胀、恶心和排便困难等主观症状明显改善:结论:尽管在 RIC 后追加 TA 是安全的,但追加 TA 对扩张后的管腔通畅性可能无效。结论:虽然在 RIC 后追加 TA 是安全的,但追加 TA 对扩张后的管腔通畅性可能无效,因此有必要进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Difficult biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for distal malignant biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic cancer: An observational study Endoscopic risk factors to inform early detection of gastric cancer after Helicobacter pylori eradication: Meta-analysis and systematic review Proton pump inhibitor-induced large gastric polyps can regress within 2 months after discontinuation: Experience from two cases Multiple esophageal ulcers in a pediatric case of granulomatosis with polyangiitis: A case report Endoscopic features of gastric neuroendocrine tumors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1