{"title":"Beyond group classification: Probabilistic differential diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease with MRI and CSF biomarkers","authors":"Agnès Pérez-Millan , Bertrand Thirion , Neus Falgàs , Sergi Borrego-Écija , Beatriz Bosch , Jordi Juncà-Parella , Adrià Tort-Merino , Jordi Sarto , Josep Maria Augé , Anna Antonell , Nuria Bargalló , Mircea Balasa , Albert Lladó , Raquel Sánchez-Valle , Roser Sala-Llonch","doi":"10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers are used to differentiate frontotemporal dementia (FTD) from Alzheimer’s disease (AD). We implemented a machine learning algorithm that provides individual probabilistic scores based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) data. We investigated whether combining MRI and CSF levels could improve the diagnosis confidence. 215 AD patients, 103 FTD patients, and 173 healthy controls (CTR) were studied. With MRI data, we obtained an accuracy of 82 % for AD vs. FTD. A total of 74 % of FTD and 73 % of AD participants have a high probability of accurate diagnosis. Adding CSF-NfL and 14–3–3 levels improved the accuracy and the number of patients in the confidence group for differentiating FTD from AD. We obtain individual diagnostic probabilities with high precision to address the problem of confidence in the diagnosis. We suggest when MRI, CSF, or the combination are necessary to improve the FTD and AD diagnosis. This algorithm holds promise towards clinical applications as support to clinical findings or in settings with limited access to expert diagnoses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19110,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Aging","volume":"144 ","pages":"Pages 1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197458024001453/pdfft?md5=27ed6918da1a31097d24f8f77b77fe57&pid=1-s2.0-S0197458024001453-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197458024001453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers are used to differentiate frontotemporal dementia (FTD) from Alzheimer’s disease (AD). We implemented a machine learning algorithm that provides individual probabilistic scores based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) data. We investigated whether combining MRI and CSF levels could improve the diagnosis confidence. 215 AD patients, 103 FTD patients, and 173 healthy controls (CTR) were studied. With MRI data, we obtained an accuracy of 82 % for AD vs. FTD. A total of 74 % of FTD and 73 % of AD participants have a high probability of accurate diagnosis. Adding CSF-NfL and 14–3–3 levels improved the accuracy and the number of patients in the confidence group for differentiating FTD from AD. We obtain individual diagnostic probabilities with high precision to address the problem of confidence in the diagnosis. We suggest when MRI, CSF, or the combination are necessary to improve the FTD and AD diagnosis. This algorithm holds promise towards clinical applications as support to clinical findings or in settings with limited access to expert diagnoses.
期刊介绍:
Neurobiology of Aging publishes the results of studies in behavior, biochemistry, cell biology, endocrinology, molecular biology, morphology, neurology, neuropathology, pharmacology, physiology and protein chemistry in which the primary emphasis involves mechanisms of nervous system changes with age or diseases associated with age. Reviews and primary research articles are included, occasionally accompanied by open peer commentary. Letters to the Editor and brief communications are also acceptable. Brief reports of highly time-sensitive material are usually treated as rapid communications in which case editorial review is completed within six weeks and publication scheduled for the next available issue.