Darha M. Ponder, Elli Cole, Michaeline Jensen, Suzanne Vrshek-Schallhorn
{"title":"Associations of early adversity and negative emotionality with emerging adult latent internalizing","authors":"Darha M. Ponder, Elli Cole, Michaeline Jensen, Suzanne Vrshek-Schallhorn","doi":"10.1016/j.psycom.2024.100193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Early adversity (EA) predicts later internalizing, and trait diatheses also play a role in how this risk manifests. However, research is mixed on whether these factors function independently or interactively. Furthermore, recent work questions whether three trait diatheses thought to be distinct—neuroticism, dysfunctional attitudes, and brooding rumination—may be modeled as a single latent negative emotionality factor. The present study tests if brooding rumination and dysfunctional attitudes are better modeled with neuroticism as part of negative emotionality, as opposed to separate constructs, and whether negative emotionality and EA interact to predict latent internalizing or operate independently.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>768 emerging adults (71.1% minoritized race/ethnicity) completed self-report surveys for this study. Latent moderated structural equation models were conducted to test associations between EA, trait diatheses, and internalizing.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Brooding rumination and dysfunctional attitudes were best modeled as latent factors separate from—but highly correlated with—latent neuroticism. Latent trait diatheses and EA did not significantly interact to predict internalizing symptoms; however, there were significant main effects of latent brooding rumination and neuroticism. Although EA and dysfunctional attitudes had significant associations with internalizing when examined alone, their effects were negligible once neuroticism and brooding rumination were included in models.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings suggest neuroticism most strongly confers risk for internalizing, which may help to inform preventive intervention efforts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74595,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry research communications","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598724000394/pdfft?md5=5e6af00a3adbe3ba659861a37fd3147d&pid=1-s2.0-S2772598724000394-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598724000394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Early adversity (EA) predicts later internalizing, and trait diatheses also play a role in how this risk manifests. However, research is mixed on whether these factors function independently or interactively. Furthermore, recent work questions whether three trait diatheses thought to be distinct—neuroticism, dysfunctional attitudes, and brooding rumination—may be modeled as a single latent negative emotionality factor. The present study tests if brooding rumination and dysfunctional attitudes are better modeled with neuroticism as part of negative emotionality, as opposed to separate constructs, and whether negative emotionality and EA interact to predict latent internalizing or operate independently.
Methods
768 emerging adults (71.1% minoritized race/ethnicity) completed self-report surveys for this study. Latent moderated structural equation models were conducted to test associations between EA, trait diatheses, and internalizing.
Results
Brooding rumination and dysfunctional attitudes were best modeled as latent factors separate from—but highly correlated with—latent neuroticism. Latent trait diatheses and EA did not significantly interact to predict internalizing symptoms; however, there were significant main effects of latent brooding rumination and neuroticism. Although EA and dysfunctional attitudes had significant associations with internalizing when examined alone, their effects were negligible once neuroticism and brooding rumination were included in models.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest neuroticism most strongly confers risk for internalizing, which may help to inform preventive intervention efforts.
背景早期逆境(EA)预示着日后的内化,而特质差异也对这种风险的表现方式起着一定的作用。然而,关于这些因素是独立起作用还是相互影响,研究结果不一。此外,最近的研究提出了一个问题,即被认为是不同的三个特质片断--神经质、功能失调态度和耿耿于怀的反刍--是否可以被建模为一个单一的潜在负性情绪因素。本研究检验了耿耿于怀的反刍和功能失调的态度是否能更好地与作为消极情绪性一部分的神经质一起建模,而不是单独建模,以及消极情绪性和EA是相互作用来预测潜在的内部化还是独立运作。结果反刍和机能障碍态度被最好地模拟为独立于潜在神经质的潜在因素,但与潜在神经质高度相关。在预测内化症状方面,潜在特质二元性和 EA 没有显著的相互作用;但是,潜在的忧郁反刍和神经质有显著的主效应。我们的研究结果表明,神经质最有可能导致内化风险,这可能有助于为预防性干预工作提供信息。