Associations of early adversity and negative emotionality with emerging adult latent internalizing

Darha M. Ponder, Elli Cole, Michaeline Jensen, Suzanne Vrshek-Schallhorn
{"title":"Associations of early adversity and negative emotionality with emerging adult latent internalizing","authors":"Darha M. Ponder,&nbsp;Elli Cole,&nbsp;Michaeline Jensen,&nbsp;Suzanne Vrshek-Schallhorn","doi":"10.1016/j.psycom.2024.100193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Early adversity (EA) predicts later internalizing, and trait diatheses also play a role in how this risk manifests. However, research is mixed on whether these factors function independently or interactively. Furthermore, recent work questions whether three trait diatheses thought to be distinct—neuroticism, dysfunctional attitudes, and brooding rumination—may be modeled as a single latent negative emotionality factor. The present study tests if brooding rumination and dysfunctional attitudes are better modeled with neuroticism as part of negative emotionality, as opposed to separate constructs, and whether negative emotionality and EA interact to predict latent internalizing or operate independently.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>768 emerging adults (71.1% minoritized race/ethnicity) completed self-report surveys for this study. Latent moderated structural equation models were conducted to test associations between EA, trait diatheses, and internalizing.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Brooding rumination and dysfunctional attitudes were best modeled as latent factors separate from—but highly correlated with—latent neuroticism. Latent trait diatheses and EA did not significantly interact to predict internalizing symptoms; however, there were significant main effects of latent brooding rumination and neuroticism. Although EA and dysfunctional attitudes had significant associations with internalizing when examined alone, their effects were negligible once neuroticism and brooding rumination were included in models.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings suggest neuroticism most strongly confers risk for internalizing, which may help to inform preventive intervention efforts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74595,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry research communications","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598724000394/pdfft?md5=5e6af00a3adbe3ba659861a37fd3147d&pid=1-s2.0-S2772598724000394-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598724000394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Early adversity (EA) predicts later internalizing, and trait diatheses also play a role in how this risk manifests. However, research is mixed on whether these factors function independently or interactively. Furthermore, recent work questions whether three trait diatheses thought to be distinct—neuroticism, dysfunctional attitudes, and brooding rumination—may be modeled as a single latent negative emotionality factor. The present study tests if brooding rumination and dysfunctional attitudes are better modeled with neuroticism as part of negative emotionality, as opposed to separate constructs, and whether negative emotionality and EA interact to predict latent internalizing or operate independently.

Methods

768 emerging adults (71.1% minoritized race/ethnicity) completed self-report surveys for this study. Latent moderated structural equation models were conducted to test associations between EA, trait diatheses, and internalizing.

Results

Brooding rumination and dysfunctional attitudes were best modeled as latent factors separate from—but highly correlated with—latent neuroticism. Latent trait diatheses and EA did not significantly interact to predict internalizing symptoms; however, there were significant main effects of latent brooding rumination and neuroticism. Although EA and dysfunctional attitudes had significant associations with internalizing when examined alone, their effects were negligible once neuroticism and brooding rumination were included in models.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest neuroticism most strongly confers risk for internalizing, which may help to inform preventive intervention efforts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期逆境和消极情绪与成年后潜在内化的关系
背景早期逆境(EA)预示着日后的内化,而特质差异也对这种风险的表现方式起着一定的作用。然而,关于这些因素是独立起作用还是相互影响,研究结果不一。此外,最近的研究提出了一个问题,即被认为是不同的三个特质片断--神经质、功能失调态度和耿耿于怀的反刍--是否可以被建模为一个单一的潜在负性情绪因素。本研究检验了耿耿于怀的反刍和功能失调的态度是否能更好地与作为消极情绪性一部分的神经质一起建模,而不是单独建模,以及消极情绪性和EA是相互作用来预测潜在的内部化还是独立运作。结果反刍和机能障碍态度被最好地模拟为独立于潜在神经质的潜在因素,但与潜在神经质高度相关。在预测内化症状方面,潜在特质二元性和 EA 没有显著的相互作用;但是,潜在的忧郁反刍和神经质有显著的主效应。我们的研究结果表明,神经质最有可能导致内化风险,这可能有助于为预防性干预工作提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry research communications
Psychiatry research communications Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
77 days
期刊最新文献
An investigation into the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and food addiction: The role of urgency and emotion dysregulation Factors related to painful somatic symptoms in patients with depression: The role of gender and anhedonia rtfMRI neurofeedback interventions are not cost prohibitive The impact of childhood sexual, physical and emotional abuse and neglect on suicidal behavior and non-suicidal self-injury: A systematic review of meta-analyses Convergent and predictive validity of the Mini MoCA and considerations for use among older adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1