Concomitant Tricuspid Valve Surgery With Mitral Valve Surgery for Moderate Tricuspid Regurgitation

{"title":"Concomitant Tricuspid Valve Surgery With Mitral Valve Surgery for Moderate Tricuspid Regurgitation","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2023.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Tricuspid valve surgical procedures (TVS) concomitant with mitral valve (MV) surgical procedures for less than severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) remains controversial. This study examined the long-term outcomes of patients with moderate or mild to moderate TR undergoing MV surgical procedures with or without TVS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with moderate or mild to moderate TR undergoing MV replacement or repair between January 2002 and June 2021 were included. Primary outcomes of reoperation and long-term survival were compared for patients undergoing MV replacement or repair with or without TVS before and after stratifying by mitral disease cause.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 505 patients. Mean age was 69 ± 12.7 years. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality for MV replacement (3.71 vs 4.39; <em>P</em> = .34) and repair (1.73 vs 1.67; <em>P</em> = .84) was similar for patients who did and did not undergo TVS. Operative mortality was similar for replacement (4.2% vs 6.1%; <em>P</em> = .77) or repair (0% vs 0%) with or without TVS. Patients undergoing MV replacement or repair with or without TVS had similar 10-year survival (67.1% vs 73.2% [<em>P</em> = .37]; 68.7% vs 78.8% [<em>P</em> = .052]) and rates of reoperation (2.1% vs 0.8% [<em>P</em> = .69]; 4.9% vs 4.6% [<em>P</em> = .99]). Cox proportional hazards modeling confirmed that TVS did not decrease the risk of death after MV replacement (hazard ratio, 0.839 [0.479-1.467]) or repair (hazard ratio, 0.852 [0.516-1.408]). The findings were unchanged after stratifying by MV disease cause or restricting the analysis to patients with moderate TR only, with no differences in survival or reoperation (all <em>P</em> &gt; .05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Concomitant TVS for moderate or mild to moderate TR did not improve survival or decrease reoperation. Parameters beyond the degree of TR may aid in surgical decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993123003923/pdfft?md5=4d5f89435aea6c23af15104a6914b434&pid=1-s2.0-S2772993123003923-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993123003923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Tricuspid valve surgical procedures (TVS) concomitant with mitral valve (MV) surgical procedures for less than severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) remains controversial. This study examined the long-term outcomes of patients with moderate or mild to moderate TR undergoing MV surgical procedures with or without TVS.

Methods

Patients with moderate or mild to moderate TR undergoing MV replacement or repair between January 2002 and June 2021 were included. Primary outcomes of reoperation and long-term survival were compared for patients undergoing MV replacement or repair with or without TVS before and after stratifying by mitral disease cause.

Results

The study included 505 patients. Mean age was 69 ± 12.7 years. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality for MV replacement (3.71 vs 4.39; P = .34) and repair (1.73 vs 1.67; P = .84) was similar for patients who did and did not undergo TVS. Operative mortality was similar for replacement (4.2% vs 6.1%; P = .77) or repair (0% vs 0%) with or without TVS. Patients undergoing MV replacement or repair with or without TVS had similar 10-year survival (67.1% vs 73.2% [P = .37]; 68.7% vs 78.8% [P = .052]) and rates of reoperation (2.1% vs 0.8% [P = .69]; 4.9% vs 4.6% [P = .99]). Cox proportional hazards modeling confirmed that TVS did not decrease the risk of death after MV replacement (hazard ratio, 0.839 [0.479-1.467]) or repair (hazard ratio, 0.852 [0.516-1.408]). The findings were unchanged after stratifying by MV disease cause or restricting the analysis to patients with moderate TR only, with no differences in survival or reoperation (all P > .05).

Conclusions

Concomitant TVS for moderate or mild to moderate TR did not improve survival or decrease reoperation. Parameters beyond the degree of TR may aid in surgical decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三尖瓣手术与二尖瓣手术并用治疗中度三尖瓣反流
背景三尖瓣手术(TVS)与二尖瓣手术(MV)同时治疗轻度三尖瓣反流(TR)仍存在争议。本研究探讨了中度或轻度至中度三尖瓣反流患者在接受二尖瓣手术治疗的同时接受或不接受 TVS 的长期疗效。方法纳入 2002 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月间接受二尖瓣置换或修复手术的中度或轻度至中度三尖瓣反流患者。比较了根据二尖瓣疾病病因分层前后接受中风置换或修补术并行或不行经皮瓣置换术的患者的再手术和长期生存的主要结果。平均年龄为 69 ± 12.7 岁。胸外科医师学会预测的中风置换术(3.71 vs 4.39;P = .34)和修复术(1.73 vs 1.67;P = .84)死亡率风险在接受和未接受 TVS 的患者中相似。进行或不进行 TVS 的置换术(4.2% vs 6.1%;P = .77)或修复术(0% vs 0%)的手术死亡率相似。接受或未接受 TVS 的中风置换术或修复术患者的 10 年生存率(67.1% vs 73.2% [P = .37];68.7% vs 78.8% [P = .052])和再次手术率(2.1% vs 0.8% [P = .69];4.9% vs 4.6% [P = .99])相似。Cox比例危险模型证实,TVS不会降低中风置换术(危险比为0.839 [0.479-1.467])或修复术(危险比为0.852 [0.516-1.408])后的死亡风险。结论中度或轻度至中度TR患者同时进行TVS并不能提高生存率或减少再手术次数。TR程度以外的参数可能有助于手术决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
期刊最新文献
Erratum Contents Perceptions of Frailty and Prehabilitation Among Thoracic Surgeons: Findings From a National Survey Pulmonary Artery Vasa Vasorum Damage in Severe COVID-19–Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis Single-Stage Surgical Approach to Aortoesophageal Fistula After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1