Marva Seifert, Donald G Catanzaro, Michael Gracia, Naomi Hillery, Sabira Tahseen, Faisal Masood, Alamdar Hussain, Uzma Majeed, Rebecca E Coleman, Rehan R Syed, Antonino Catanzaro, Timothy Rodwell
{"title":"Prospective exploratory evaluation of Cepheid Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis host response cartridge: a focus on adolescents and young adults.","authors":"Marva Seifert, Donald G Catanzaro, Michael Gracia, Naomi Hillery, Sabira Tahseen, Faisal Masood, Alamdar Hussain, Uzma Majeed, Rebecca E Coleman, Rehan R Syed, Antonino Catanzaro, Timothy Rodwell","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An accurate, rapid, non-sputum-based triage test for diagnosing tuberculosis (TB) is needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective evaluation of the Xpert-MTB-HR cartridge, a prototype blood-based host-response mRNA signature assay, among individuals presenting with TB-like symptoms was performed in Pakistan and results were compared to three reference standards: Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, bacteriological confirmation (Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and/or culture positivity), and composite clinical diagnosis (clinician diagnosis, treatment initiation, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, and/or culture positivity). Analyses were conducted both for the entire study cohort and separately in the adolescent and young adult cohort (ages 10-24).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 497 participants, ages 6-83, returned valid Xpert-MTB-HR results. When a diagnostic threshold was set for a sensitivity of >90%, specificity was 32% (95%CI 28-37) when compared to Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, 29% (95%CI 25-34) when compared to a bacteriological confirmation, and 22% (95%CI 18-26) when compared to a composite clinical diagnosis. However, when evaluating only the adolescent and young adult cohort with a diagnostic threshold set for sensitivity of >90%, specificity was 82% (95%CI 74-89) when compared to Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, 84% (95%CI 75-90) when compared to a bacteriological confirmation, and 54% (95%CI 44-64) when compared to a composite clinical diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the Xpert-MTB-HR does not meet World Health Organization minimum criteria in the general population, in our study it does meet the minimum sensitivity and specificity requirements for a non-sputum-based triage test among adolescents and young adults when compared to Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra or bacteriological confirmation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae461","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: An accurate, rapid, non-sputum-based triage test for diagnosing tuberculosis (TB) is needed.
Methods: A prospective evaluation of the Xpert-MTB-HR cartridge, a prototype blood-based host-response mRNA signature assay, among individuals presenting with TB-like symptoms was performed in Pakistan and results were compared to three reference standards: Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, bacteriological confirmation (Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and/or culture positivity), and composite clinical diagnosis (clinician diagnosis, treatment initiation, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, and/or culture positivity). Analyses were conducted both for the entire study cohort and separately in the adolescent and young adult cohort (ages 10-24).
Results: A total of 497 participants, ages 6-83, returned valid Xpert-MTB-HR results. When a diagnostic threshold was set for a sensitivity of >90%, specificity was 32% (95%CI 28-37) when compared to Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, 29% (95%CI 25-34) when compared to a bacteriological confirmation, and 22% (95%CI 18-26) when compared to a composite clinical diagnosis. However, when evaluating only the adolescent and young adult cohort with a diagnostic threshold set for sensitivity of >90%, specificity was 82% (95%CI 74-89) when compared to Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, 84% (95%CI 75-90) when compared to a bacteriological confirmation, and 54% (95%CI 44-64) when compared to a composite clinical diagnosis.
Conclusions: While the Xpert-MTB-HR does not meet World Health Organization minimum criteria in the general population, in our study it does meet the minimum sensitivity and specificity requirements for a non-sputum-based triage test among adolescents and young adults when compared to Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra or bacteriological confirmation.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
