Optimising POCUS programs: A summary of EMUG's recommendations for the development and maintenance of ED POCUS programs

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Medicine Australasia Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.14485
Luke Phillips MBBS, BSc (BioMed) (Hons), FACEM, CCPU, MClinSim, Alastair Maclean MB ChB, BSc Med Sci (Hons), Post Grad Cert CPU, MRCP (Lon), FRCEM, FACEM, Josh Monester MBBS(Hons), CCPU, GradCertClinEd, Joanne Douglas DMU, SEED, ASUM CCPU provider, Stacey Davidson ICF ACC, Zenergy Master Facilitator, Gabriela King MBBS, FACEM, Post Grad Cert CPU
{"title":"Optimising POCUS programs: A summary of EMUG's recommendations for the development and maintenance of ED POCUS programs","authors":"Luke Phillips MBBS, BSc (BioMed) (Hons), FACEM, CCPU, MClinSim,&nbsp;Alastair Maclean MB ChB, BSc Med Sci (Hons), Post Grad Cert CPU, MRCP (Lon), FRCEM, FACEM,&nbsp;Josh Monester MBBS(Hons), CCPU, GradCertClinEd,&nbsp;Joanne Douglas DMU, SEED, ASUM CCPU provider,&nbsp;Stacey Davidson ICF ACC, Zenergy Master Facilitator,&nbsp;Gabriela King MBBS, FACEM, Post Grad Cert CPU","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use is widespread in EDs and throughout those practising medicine. Between institutions and specialities, there is widespread variety and training. With this comes risk of patient harm and backlash to a clinically useful modality. Our objective is to form a statement that encompasses current published and unpublished guidance for creating and maintaining robust POCUS programs in EDs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Group (EMUG) identified this gap and volunteers from the group undertook a literature search of current best practice and institution guidelines relating to POCUS programs. They contacted colleagues from other specialities to find and get access to other countries and colleges' POCUS guidelines. EMUGs regularly run discussion forums (Collab-labs) and points from these were considered. Recommendations were then formed from these and recurrent unpublished obstacles the group had encountered. The result was reviewed by Clinical Leads in Ultrasound and POCUS users in Australasia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The recommendations were organised under five pillars: Infrastructure, Governance, Administration, Education and Quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These recommendations complement existing guidelines and are not intended to replace them; however, we hope to promote discussion and provide reference support for those developing POCUS programs. Implementing a comprehensive and robust ED POCUS program will ensure safe, effective, and standardised high-quality POCUS use, with the aim of improving patient care across Australia and New Zealand. Patient safety will be enhanced through effective risk management and quality assurance and there will be consistency in POCUS education, training and credentialing across institutions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1742-6723.14485","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.14485","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use is widespread in EDs and throughout those practising medicine. Between institutions and specialities, there is widespread variety and training. With this comes risk of patient harm and backlash to a clinically useful modality. Our objective is to form a statement that encompasses current published and unpublished guidance for creating and maintaining robust POCUS programs in EDs.

Methods

Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Group (EMUG) identified this gap and volunteers from the group undertook a literature search of current best practice and institution guidelines relating to POCUS programs. They contacted colleagues from other specialities to find and get access to other countries and colleges' POCUS guidelines. EMUGs regularly run discussion forums (Collab-labs) and points from these were considered. Recommendations were then formed from these and recurrent unpublished obstacles the group had encountered. The result was reviewed by Clinical Leads in Ultrasound and POCUS users in Australasia.

Results

The recommendations were organised under five pillars: Infrastructure, Governance, Administration, Education and Quality.

Conclusion

These recommendations complement existing guidelines and are not intended to replace them; however, we hope to promote discussion and provide reference support for those developing POCUS programs. Implementing a comprehensive and robust ED POCUS program will ensure safe, effective, and standardised high-quality POCUS use, with the aim of improving patient care across Australia and New Zealand. Patient safety will be enhanced through effective risk management and quality assurance and there will be consistency in POCUS education, training and credentialing across institutions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化 POCUS 计划:EMUG关于制定和维护 ED POCUS 计划的建议摘要。
目的:护理点超声波 (POCUS) 在急诊室和所有行医者中广泛使用。在不同的机构和专科之间,其种类和培训都很广泛。随之而来的是对患者造成伤害的风险,以及对临床有用方式的反弹。我们的目标是形成一份声明,涵盖当前已发表和未发表的指南,以便在急诊室创建和维护稳健的 POCUS 计划:急诊医学超声小组(EMUG)发现了这一空白,该小组的志愿者对当前与 POCUS 项目相关的最佳实践和机构指南进行了文献检索。他们与其他专科的同事取得联系,寻找并获取其他国家和学院的 POCUS 指南。EMUG定期举办讨论论坛(Collab-labs),并对论坛中的观点进行审议。然后,根据这些要点和小组反复遇到的未发表的障碍形成建议。澳大拉西亚的超声临床负责人和 POCUS 用户对结果进行了审核:结果:建议分为五大支柱:结果:建议分为五大支柱:基础设施、治理、行政、教育和质量:这些建议是对现有指南的补充,并不打算取代现有指南;但是,我们希望能促进讨论,并为制定 POCUS 计划的人员提供参考支持。实施全面而稳健的急诊室 POCUS 计划将确保安全、有效和标准化的高质量 POCUS 使用,从而改善澳大利亚和新西兰的患者护理。通过有效的风险管理和质量保证,患者安全将得到加强,各机构的 POCUS 教育、培训和资格认证也将保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Review article: Primer for clinical researchers on innovative trial designs for emergency medicine. Issue Information Cover Image Divide and conquer? Emergency medicine subspecialties in Australasia Emergency medicine needs a narrower scope and a broader worldview
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1