Prediction of epilepsy after stroke: Proposal of a modified SeLECT 2.0 score based on posttreatment stroke outcome.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsia Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1111/epi.18114
Stefano Meletti, Claudia Cuccurullo, Niccolò Orlandi, Giuseppe Borzì, Guido Bigliardi, Stefania Maffei, Cinzia Del Giovane, Riccardo Cuoghi Costantini, Giada Giovannini, Simona Lattanzi
{"title":"Prediction of epilepsy after stroke: Proposal of a modified SeLECT 2.0 score based on posttreatment stroke outcome.","authors":"Stefano Meletti, Claudia Cuccurullo, Niccolò Orlandi, Giuseppe Borzì, Guido Bigliardi, Stefania Maffei, Cinzia Del Giovane, Riccardo Cuoghi Costantini, Giada Giovannini, Simona Lattanzi","doi":"10.1111/epi.18114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The SeLECT 2.0 score is a prognostic model of epilepsy after ischemic stroke. We explored whether replacing the severity of stroke at admission with the severity of stroke after treatment at 72 h from onset could improve the predictive accuracy of the score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified consecutive adults with acute first-ever neuroimaging-confirmed ischemic stroke who were admitted to the Stroke Unit of the Ospedale Civile Baggiovara (Modena, Italy) and treated with intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular treatment. Study outcome was the occurrence of at least one unprovoked seizure presenting >7 days after stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included in the analysis numbered 1094. The median age of the subjects was 74 (interquartile range [IQR] = 64-81) years, and 595 (54.4%) were males. Sixty-five (5.9%) subjects developed unprovoked seizures a median of 10 (IQR = 6-27) months after stroke. The median values of the original and modified SeLECT2.0 scores were 3 (IQR = 2-4) and 2 (IQR = 1-3). The modified SeLECT 2.0 score showed better discrimination for the prediction of poststroke epilepsy at 36, 48, and 60 months after stroke compared to the original score according to the area under time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves. The modified SeLECT 2.0 score had higher values of Harrell C and Somers D parameters and lower values of Akaike and Bayesian information criteria than the original score. The modified SeLECT 2.0 score produced more accurate risk predictions compared to the SeLECT 2.0 score at all evaluated time points from 12 to 60 months after stroke according to the Net Reclassification Index.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Replacing baseline with posttreatment stroke severity may improve the ability of the SeLECT 2.0 score to predict poststroke epilepsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18114","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The SeLECT 2.0 score is a prognostic model of epilepsy after ischemic stroke. We explored whether replacing the severity of stroke at admission with the severity of stroke after treatment at 72 h from onset could improve the predictive accuracy of the score.

Methods: We retrospectively identified consecutive adults with acute first-ever neuroimaging-confirmed ischemic stroke who were admitted to the Stroke Unit of the Ospedale Civile Baggiovara (Modena, Italy) and treated with intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular treatment. Study outcome was the occurrence of at least one unprovoked seizure presenting >7 days after stroke.

Results: Participants included in the analysis numbered 1094. The median age of the subjects was 74 (interquartile range [IQR] = 64-81) years, and 595 (54.4%) were males. Sixty-five (5.9%) subjects developed unprovoked seizures a median of 10 (IQR = 6-27) months after stroke. The median values of the original and modified SeLECT2.0 scores were 3 (IQR = 2-4) and 2 (IQR = 1-3). The modified SeLECT 2.0 score showed better discrimination for the prediction of poststroke epilepsy at 36, 48, and 60 months after stroke compared to the original score according to the area under time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves. The modified SeLECT 2.0 score had higher values of Harrell C and Somers D parameters and lower values of Akaike and Bayesian information criteria than the original score. The modified SeLECT 2.0 score produced more accurate risk predictions compared to the SeLECT 2.0 score at all evaluated time points from 12 to 60 months after stroke according to the Net Reclassification Index.

Significance: Replacing baseline with posttreatment stroke severity may improve the ability of the SeLECT 2.0 score to predict poststroke epilepsy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中风后癫痫的预测:基于中风治疗后结果的改良 SeLECT 2.0 评分建议。
目的: SeLECT 2.0 评分是缺血性脑卒中后癫痫的预后模型:SeLECT 2.0 评分是缺血性脑卒中后癫痫的预后模型。我们探讨了用发病 72 小时后治疗后的中风严重程度取代入院时的中风严重程度是否能提高该评分的预测准确性:方法:我们回顾性地识别了在 Ospedale Civile Baggiovara(意大利摩德纳)卒中单元住院并接受静脉溶栓和/或血管内治疗的急性首次神经影像学确诊缺血性卒中的连续成人患者。研究结果为中风后7天以上出现至少一次无诱因癫痫发作:参与分析的患者有 1094 人。受试者的中位年龄为 74 岁(四分位距[IQR] = 64-81 岁),男性 595 人(54.4%)。65名受试者(5.9%)在中风后10个月(IQR = 6-27)出现无诱因癫痫发作。原始和修改后的 SeLECT2.0 评分中位值分别为 3(IQR = 2-4)和 2(IQR = 1-3)。根据时间依赖性接收器操作特征曲线下的面积,与原始评分相比,修改后的 SeLECT 2.0 评分在脑卒中后 36、48 和 60 个月预测脑卒中后癫痫方面显示出更好的分辨能力。与原始评分相比,修改后的 SeLECT 2.0 评分的 Harrell C 和 Somers D 参数值更高,而 Akaike 和 Bayesian 信息标准值更低。根据净重分类指数(Net Reclassification Index),在中风后 12 至 60 个月的所有评估时间点上,修改后的 SeLECT 2.0 评分与 SeLECT 2.0 评分相比,风险预测更准确:意义:用治疗后中风严重程度取代基线可提高 SeLECT 2.0 评分预测中风后癫痫的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
期刊最新文献
Association of baseline sleep duration and sleep quality with seizure recurrence in newly treated patients with epilepsy N‐of‐1 trials in epilepsy: A systematic review and lessons paving the way forward Poststroke seizures and epilepsy increase the risk of dementia among stroke survivors: A population‐based study Nonictal electroencephalographic measures for the diagnosis of functional seizures Factors associated with poor sleep in children with drug‐resistant epilepsy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1