Adherence-enhancing interventions for pharmacological and oxygen therapy in patients with COPD: a systematic review and component network meta-analyses.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM European Respiratory Review Pub Date : 2024-09-04 Print Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1183/16000617.0011-2024
Omar Ammous, Regina Kampo, Maximilian Wollsching-Strobel, Maximilian Zimmermann, Stefan Andreas, Tim Friede, Doreen Kroppen, Sarah Stanzel, Susanna Salem, Wolfram Windisch, Tim Mathes
{"title":"Adherence-enhancing interventions for pharmacological and oxygen therapy in patients with COPD: a systematic review and component network meta-analyses.","authors":"Omar Ammous, Regina Kampo, Maximilian Wollsching-Strobel, Maximilian Zimmermann, Stefan Andreas, Tim Friede, Doreen Kroppen, Sarah Stanzel, Susanna Salem, Wolfram Windisch, Tim Mathes","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0011-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adherence to COPD management strategies is complex, and it is unclear which intervention may enhance it.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventions, alone or compared to interventions, for patients with COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review comprises a component network meta-analysis with a structured narrative synthesis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL and trial registries on 9 September 2023. We included controlled studies that explored adherence in patients with COPD. Two review authors independently performed the study selection, data extraction and the risk of bias assessment. We involved patients with COPD in developing this systematic review through focus group interviews and displayed the findings in pre-designed logic models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 33 studies with 5775 participants. We included 13 studies in the component network meta-analysis that explored adherence. It was mainly assessed through questionnaires. As a continuous outcome, there was a tendency mainly for education (standardised mean difference 1.26, 95% CI 1.13-1.38, very low certainty of evidence) and motivation (mean difference 1.85, 95% CI 1.19-2.50, very low certainty of evidence) to improve adherence. As a dichotomous outcome (<i>e.g.</i> adherent/non-adherent), we found a possible benefit with education (odds ratio 4.77, 95% CI 2.25-10.14, low certainty of evidence) but not with the other components. We included six studies that reported quality of life in the component network meta-analysis. Again, we found a benefit of education (mean difference -9.70, 95% CI -10.82- -8.57, low certainty of evidence) but not with the other components.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Education may improve adherence and quality of life in COPD patients. Patient focus group interviews indicated that interventions that strengthen patients' self-efficacy and help them to achieve individual goals are the most helpful.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0011-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Adherence to COPD management strategies is complex, and it is unclear which intervention may enhance it.

Objectives: We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventions, alone or compared to interventions, for patients with COPD.

Methods: This review comprises a component network meta-analysis with a structured narrative synthesis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL and trial registries on 9 September 2023. We included controlled studies that explored adherence in patients with COPD. Two review authors independently performed the study selection, data extraction and the risk of bias assessment. We involved patients with COPD in developing this systematic review through focus group interviews and displayed the findings in pre-designed logic models.

Results: We included 33 studies with 5775 participants. We included 13 studies in the component network meta-analysis that explored adherence. It was mainly assessed through questionnaires. As a continuous outcome, there was a tendency mainly for education (standardised mean difference 1.26, 95% CI 1.13-1.38, very low certainty of evidence) and motivation (mean difference 1.85, 95% CI 1.19-2.50, very low certainty of evidence) to improve adherence. As a dichotomous outcome (e.g. adherent/non-adherent), we found a possible benefit with education (odds ratio 4.77, 95% CI 2.25-10.14, low certainty of evidence) but not with the other components. We included six studies that reported quality of life in the component network meta-analysis. Again, we found a benefit of education (mean difference -9.70, 95% CI -10.82- -8.57, low certainty of evidence) but not with the other components.

Conclusions: Education may improve adherence and quality of life in COPD patients. Patient focus group interviews indicated that interventions that strengthen patients' self-efficacy and help them to achieve individual goals are the most helpful.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性阻塞性肺病患者坚持药物和氧气治疗的干预措施:系统综述和成分网络荟萃分析。
导言:慢性阻塞性肺病管理策略的依从性非常复杂,目前尚不清楚哪种干预措施可以提高依从性:我们旨在评估针对慢性阻塞性肺病患者的增强依从性干预措施的有效性,无论是单独使用还是与干预措施进行比较:本综述包括一项网络荟萃分析和一项结构化叙事综合分析。我们于 2023 年 9 月 9 日检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、CENTRAL、CINAHL 和试验登记。我们纳入了探讨 COPD 患者依从性的对照研究。两位综述作者独立完成了研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。我们通过焦点小组访谈让慢性阻塞性肺病患者参与了本系统综述的撰写,并在预先设计的逻辑模型中展示了研究结果:我们纳入了 33 项研究,共有 5775 名参与者。我们在成分网络荟萃分析中纳入了 13 项探讨依从性的研究。研究主要通过问卷进行评估。作为连续性结果,教育(标准化平均差为 1.26,95% CI 为 1.13-1.38,证据确定性很低)和动机(平均差为 1.85,95% CI 为 1.19-2.50,证据确定性很低)是提高依从性的主要趋势。作为二分法结果(如依从/不依从),我们发现教育(几率比 4.77,95% CI 2.25-10.14,证据确定性低)可能会带来益处,但其他因素则不会带来益处。我们在成分网络荟萃分析中纳入了六项报告生活质量的研究。我们再次发现了教育的益处(平均差异为-9.70,95% CI为-10.82--8.57,证据确定性低),但与其他因素无关:教育可提高慢性阻塞性肺病患者的依从性和生活质量。患者焦点小组访谈表明,加强患者自我效能并帮助他们实现个人目标的干预措施最有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Respiratory Review
European Respiratory Review Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.
期刊最新文献
Antibody-mediated protection against respiratory syncytial virus in children. Epidemiology of bronchiectasis. Epidemiology of severe asthma in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Impaired lung function and associated risk factors in children born prematurely: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Noninvasive diagnostic modalities and prediction models for detecting pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1