Fludrocortisone dose-response relationship in septic shock: a randomised phase II trial.

IF 27.1 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1007/s00134-024-07616-z
James Walsham, Naomi Hammond, Antje Blumenthal, Jeremy Cohen, John Myburgh, Simon Finfer, David Evans, Sandra Peake, Peter Kruger, James McCullough, Loki Johnk, Dhaval Ghelani, Laurent Billot, Sana Shan, Jason Meyer, Dorrilyn Rajbhandari, Carolyn Koch, Rinaldo Bellomo, Louise M Burrell, Morag Young, Michael Roberts, Lorraine Mackenzie, Gregory Medley, Joshua Dalton, Balasubramanian Venkatesh
{"title":"Fludrocortisone dose-response relationship in septic shock: a randomised phase II trial.","authors":"James Walsham, Naomi Hammond, Antje Blumenthal, Jeremy Cohen, John Myburgh, Simon Finfer, David Evans, Sandra Peake, Peter Kruger, James McCullough, Loki Johnk, Dhaval Ghelani, Laurent Billot, Sana Shan, Jason Meyer, Dorrilyn Rajbhandari, Carolyn Koch, Rinaldo Bellomo, Louise M Burrell, Morag Young, Michael Roberts, Lorraine Mackenzie, Gregory Medley, Joshua Dalton, Balasubramanian Venkatesh","doi":"10.1007/s00134-024-07616-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The combination of intravenous hydrocortisone and enteral fludrocortisone may reduce mortality in patients with septic shock. The optimal dose and reliability of absorption of fludrocortisone in critically ill patients are unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a multi-centre, open label, phase II randomized clinical trial, intravenous hydrocortisone alone or in combination with one of three doses of enteral fludrocortisone (50 µg, 100 µg or 200 µg daily) for 7 days was compared in patients with septic shock. The primary outcome was time to shock resolution. We conducted pharmacokinetic studies to assess absorption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 153 enrolled patients, 38 (25%) received hydrocortisone alone, 42 (27%) received additional 50 µg, 36 (24%) received 100 µg and 37 (24%) received 200 µg fludrocortisone. Plasma concentrations of fludrocortisone were detected in 97% of patients at 3 h-median (interquartile range [IQR]) 261 (156-334) ng/L. There was no significant difference in the time to shock resolution between groups with median (IQR) of 3 (2.5-4.5), 3 (2-4), 3 (2-6) and 3 (2-5.5) days in the hydrocortisone alone, 50 µg, 100 µg and 200 µg fludrocortisone groups, respectively. The corresponding 28-day mortality rates were 9/38 (24%), 7/42 (17%), 4/36 (11%) and 4/37 (11%), respectively. There were no significant differences between groups with respect to, recurrence of shock, indices of organ failure or other secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enteral fludrocortisone resulted in detectable plasma fludrocortisone concentrations in the majority of critically ill patients with septic shock, although they varied widely indicating differing absorption and bioavailability. Its addition to hydrocortisone was not associated with shorter time to shock resolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":13665,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2050-2060"},"PeriodicalIF":27.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07616-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The combination of intravenous hydrocortisone and enteral fludrocortisone may reduce mortality in patients with septic shock. The optimal dose and reliability of absorption of fludrocortisone in critically ill patients are unclear.

Methods: In a multi-centre, open label, phase II randomized clinical trial, intravenous hydrocortisone alone or in combination with one of three doses of enteral fludrocortisone (50 µg, 100 µg or 200 µg daily) for 7 days was compared in patients with septic shock. The primary outcome was time to shock resolution. We conducted pharmacokinetic studies to assess absorption.

Results: Out of 153 enrolled patients, 38 (25%) received hydrocortisone alone, 42 (27%) received additional 50 µg, 36 (24%) received 100 µg and 37 (24%) received 200 µg fludrocortisone. Plasma concentrations of fludrocortisone were detected in 97% of patients at 3 h-median (interquartile range [IQR]) 261 (156-334) ng/L. There was no significant difference in the time to shock resolution between groups with median (IQR) of 3 (2.5-4.5), 3 (2-4), 3 (2-6) and 3 (2-5.5) days in the hydrocortisone alone, 50 µg, 100 µg and 200 µg fludrocortisone groups, respectively. The corresponding 28-day mortality rates were 9/38 (24%), 7/42 (17%), 4/36 (11%) and 4/37 (11%), respectively. There were no significant differences between groups with respect to, recurrence of shock, indices of organ failure or other secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: Enteral fludrocortisone resulted in detectable plasma fludrocortisone concentrations in the majority of critically ill patients with septic shock, although they varied widely indicating differing absorption and bioavailability. Its addition to hydrocortisone was not associated with shorter time to shock resolution.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脓毒性休克的氟氢可的松剂量-反应关系:随机 II 期试验。
背景:静脉注射氢化可的松和肠内氟氢可的松可降低脓毒性休克患者的死亡率。重症患者吸收氟氢可的松的最佳剂量和可靠性尚不清楚:在一项多中心、开放标签的 II 期随机临床试验中,对脓毒性休克患者进行了为期 7 天的静脉注射氢化可的松或联合使用三种剂量的肠道氟氢可的松(每天 50 微克、100 微克或 200 微克)的比较。主要结果是休克缓解时间。我们进行了药代动力学研究以评估吸收情况:结果:在 153 名登记的患者中,38 人(25%)单独使用氢化可的松,42 人(27%)额外使用 50 微克,36 人(24%)使用 100 微克,37 人(24%)使用 200 微克氟氢可的松。97% 的患者在服药 3 小时后检测到了氟氢可的松血浆浓度,中位数为 261(156-334)纳克/升。各组间休克缓解时间无明显差异,单用氢化可的松组、50 微克组、100 微克组和 200 微克氟氢可的松组的中位数(IQR)分别为 3 天(2.5-4.5)、3 天(2-4)、3 天(2-6)和 3 天(2-5.5)。相应的 28 天死亡率分别为 9/38(24%)、7/42(17%)、4/36(11%)和 4/37(11%)。在休克复发、器官衰竭指数或其他次要结果方面,各组间无明显差异:结论:大多数脓毒性休克重症患者口服氟氢可的松可检测到血浆中的氟氢可的松浓度,但差异很大,表明吸收和生物利用度不同。在氢化可的松基础上添加氟氢可的松与缩短休克缓解时间无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine
Intensive Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
51.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
326
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Intensive Care Medicine is the premier publication platform fostering the communication and exchange of cutting-edge research and ideas within the field of intensive care medicine on a comprehensive scale. Catering to professionals involved in intensive medical care, including intensivists, medical specialists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals, ICM stands as the official journal of The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. ICM is dedicated to advancing the understanding and practice of intensive care medicine among professionals in Europe and beyond. The journal provides a robust platform for disseminating current research findings and innovative ideas in intensive care medicine. Content published in Intensive Care Medicine encompasses a wide range, including review articles, original research papers, letters, reviews, debates, and more.
期刊最新文献
Does artificial intelligence close gaps in clinical pharmacology in the ICU? The heart–kidney axis in cirrhosis: rethinking hepatorenal and cardiorenal syndromes Using the ventilator to predict fluid responsiveness Effects of delayed consent on patient characteristics in adult patients with sepsis Beta-lactam administration, which one is the best for the planet?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1