Baroreflex Sensitivity in Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Dysfunction-The Overwhelmed Vagus Hypothesis.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1001/jamaoto.2024.2270
S A Reza Nouraei, Lachlan Ayres, Stephen J Perring
{"title":"Baroreflex Sensitivity in Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Dysfunction-The Overwhelmed Vagus Hypothesis.","authors":"S A Reza Nouraei, Lachlan Ayres, Stephen J Perring","doi":"10.1001/jamaoto.2024.2270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The autonomic nervous system maintains internal stability by concurrently prioritizing and managing different functions. It is currently not known whether dysfunction at the aerodigestive junction could overwhelm autonomic control and impair other functions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare baroreflex sensitivity, a prognostically significant index of the autonomic system's ability to stabilize blood pressure, between patients with predominantly esophagogastric (digestive) and patients with predominantly laryngopharyngeal (aerodigestive) symptoms.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A cross-sectional study, between 2018 and 2019, of adults undergoing esophagal manometry or transnasal panendoscopy was carried out in a specialist center. The analysis took place between 2023 and 2024.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded and baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability were derived. Esophageal physiology was assessed with high-resolution manometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 30 and 23 patients in the digestive and aerodigestive groups, respectively. The mean (SD) age was 61 (15) years and there were 26 women and 27 men. Compared with patients in the digestive group, more patients in the aerodigestive group had voice or throat symptoms and fewer had classic reflux symptoms (odds ratio [OR], 5.65; 95% CI, 1.82-17.5; OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.28-3.33; and OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.95, respectively). Patients in the aerodigestive group had higher mean (SD) resting heart rate (93 [17] vs 75 [13] min-1; difference of means, -18 min-1; 95% CI, -26 to -10), lower resting mean (SD) arterial pressure (94 [16] vs 104 [23] mm Hg, OR, 10; 95% CI, -1 to 21), lower mean (SD) baroreflex sensitivity (3.77 [0.79] vs 9.76 [2.92] s-3mm Hg-1; OR, 6.0 s-3mmHg-1; 95% CI, 4.7-7.2), and lower mean (SD) parasympathetic-spectrum heart rate variability (0.68 [0.15] vs 1.30 [0.53]; OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39-0.85). There was a correlation between reduced lower esophageal relaxation (integrated relaxation pressure) and reduced baroreflex sensitivity (r = -0.33; 95% CI, -0.58 to -0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cross-sectional study of adults undergoing esophageal manometry or transnasal panendoscopy, patients with laryngopharyngeal symptoms had reduced baroreflex sensitivity, indicating diminished vagal control compared with patients with esophagogastric symptoms. The overwhelmed vagus hypothesis may explain these responses by considering autonomic functions as competing consumers of the finite regulatory resources of a common controller. The regulatory demands of maintaining a safe airway with concurrent laryngopharyngeal sensorimotor dysfunction, superadded to baseline demands for dual speech and aerodigestive control, could overwhelm and force the system to deprioritize less immediate functions like esophageal relaxation and the baroreflex. Measuring baroreflex sensitivity, now possible in routine clinical practice, could enable phenotyping and objective outcome assessment for laryngopharyngeal dysfunction. A neurophysiological model for considering laryngopharyngeal sensorimotor dysfunction could in turn move patient care toward a more holistic autonomic health footing.</p>","PeriodicalId":14632,"journal":{"name":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","volume":" ","pages":"908-917"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2024.2270","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The autonomic nervous system maintains internal stability by concurrently prioritizing and managing different functions. It is currently not known whether dysfunction at the aerodigestive junction could overwhelm autonomic control and impair other functions.

Objective: To compare baroreflex sensitivity, a prognostically significant index of the autonomic system's ability to stabilize blood pressure, between patients with predominantly esophagogastric (digestive) and patients with predominantly laryngopharyngeal (aerodigestive) symptoms.

Design, setting, and participants: A cross-sectional study, between 2018 and 2019, of adults undergoing esophagal manometry or transnasal panendoscopy was carried out in a specialist center. The analysis took place between 2023 and 2024.

Main outcomes and measures: Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded and baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability were derived. Esophageal physiology was assessed with high-resolution manometry.

Results: There were 30 and 23 patients in the digestive and aerodigestive groups, respectively. The mean (SD) age was 61 (15) years and there were 26 women and 27 men. Compared with patients in the digestive group, more patients in the aerodigestive group had voice or throat symptoms and fewer had classic reflux symptoms (odds ratio [OR], 5.65; 95% CI, 1.82-17.5; OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.28-3.33; and OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.95, respectively). Patients in the aerodigestive group had higher mean (SD) resting heart rate (93 [17] vs 75 [13] min-1; difference of means, -18 min-1; 95% CI, -26 to -10), lower resting mean (SD) arterial pressure (94 [16] vs 104 [23] mm Hg, OR, 10; 95% CI, -1 to 21), lower mean (SD) baroreflex sensitivity (3.77 [0.79] vs 9.76 [2.92] s-3mm Hg-1; OR, 6.0 s-3mmHg-1; 95% CI, 4.7-7.2), and lower mean (SD) parasympathetic-spectrum heart rate variability (0.68 [0.15] vs 1.30 [0.53]; OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39-0.85). There was a correlation between reduced lower esophageal relaxation (integrated relaxation pressure) and reduced baroreflex sensitivity (r = -0.33; 95% CI, -0.58 to -0.03).

Conclusions: In this cross-sectional study of adults undergoing esophageal manometry or transnasal panendoscopy, patients with laryngopharyngeal symptoms had reduced baroreflex sensitivity, indicating diminished vagal control compared with patients with esophagogastric symptoms. The overwhelmed vagus hypothesis may explain these responses by considering autonomic functions as competing consumers of the finite regulatory resources of a common controller. The regulatory demands of maintaining a safe airway with concurrent laryngopharyngeal sensorimotor dysfunction, superadded to baseline demands for dual speech and aerodigestive control, could overwhelm and force the system to deprioritize less immediate functions like esophageal relaxation and the baroreflex. Measuring baroreflex sensitivity, now possible in routine clinical practice, could enable phenotyping and objective outcome assessment for laryngopharyngeal dysfunction. A neurophysiological model for considering laryngopharyngeal sensorimotor dysfunction could in turn move patient care toward a more holistic autonomic health footing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
喉咽功能障碍患者的气压反射敏感性--不堪重负的迷走神经假说。
重要性:自律神经系统通过同时对不同功能进行优先排序和管理来维持内部稳定。目前尚不清楚气管消化道交界处的功能障碍是否会压倒自律神经控制并损害其他功能:目的:比较以食管胃部(消化系统)症状为主的患者和以喉咽部(气管消化系统)症状为主的患者的气压反射敏感性,这是自律神经系统稳定血压能力的一项具有重要预后意义的指标:2018 年至 2019 年期间,在一家专科中心对接受食管测压或经鼻全景镜检查的成人进行了横断面研究。分析时间为 2023 年至 2024 年:对心率和血压进行记录,并得出巴反射敏感性和心率变异性。通过高分辨率测压法评估食道生理状况:消化道组和气道组分别有 30 名和 23 名患者。平均(标清)年龄为 61(15)岁,其中女性 26 人,男性 27 人。与消化系统组患者相比,气道消化系统组中有更多患者有嗓音或喉咙症状,而有典型反流症状的患者较少(几率比[OR]分别为 5.65;95% CI,1.82-17.5;OR,2.07;95% CI,1.28-3.33;OR,0.60;95% CI,0.38-0.95)。气道组患者的平均(标清)静息心率较高(93 [17] vs 75 [13] min-1;平均值差异,-18 min-1;95% CI,-26 至 -10),静息平均(标清)动脉压较低(94 [16] vs 104 [23] mm Hg,OR,10;95% CI,-1 至 21),平均(标清)气压反射敏感性较低(3.77 [0.79] vs 9.76 [2.92] s-3mm Hg-1;OR,6.0 s-3mmHg-1;95% CI,4.7-7.2),副交感谱心率变异性平均值(标度)较低(0.68 [0.15] vs 1.30 [0.53];OR,0.62;95% CI,0.39-0.85)。食管下段松弛(综合松弛压力)降低与气压反射敏感性降低之间存在相关性(r = -0.33;95% CI,-0.58 至 -0.03):在这项对接受食管测压或经鼻全景内窥镜检查的成人进行的横断面研究中,与食管胃部症状患者相比,喉咽部症状患者的气压反射敏感性降低,表明迷走神经控制能力减弱。迷走神经不堪重负假说可以通过将自律神经功能视为共同控制器有限调节资源的竞争消费者来解释这些反应。在同时出现喉咽部感觉运动功能障碍的情况下,维持安全气道的调节需求,加上语言和气道控制的双重基线需求,可能会使迷走神经不堪重负,迫使系统优先考虑食管松弛和气压反射等不太直接的功能。现在,在常规临床实践中测量气压反射灵敏度已成为可能,这将有助于对喉咽功能障碍进行表型分析和客观结果评估。考虑喉咽部感觉运动功能障碍的神经生理学模型反过来又能使患者护理朝着更全面的自律神经健康方向发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
230
期刊介绍: JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery is a globally recognized and peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to providing up-to-date information on diseases affecting the head and neck. It originated in 1925 as Archives of Otolaryngology and currently serves as the official publication for the American Head and Neck Society. As part of the prestigious JAMA Network, a collection of reputable general medical and specialty publications, it ensures the highest standards of research and expertise. Physicians and scientists worldwide rely on JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery for invaluable insights in this specialized field.
期刊最新文献
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma-Reply. Lobectomy vs Total Thyroidectomy With Ipsilateral Lateral Neck Dissection for N1b Intermediate-Risk Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Oropharyngeal Necrotizing Fasciitis in a Previously Healthy Patient. Polygenic Score for Clinicopathologic Features and Survival Outcomes in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Firm Gingival Enlargement in the Anterior Maxilla.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1