A 2.6% Benzoyl Peroxide AV Cleanser Specifically Designed for Sensitive Skin Offers Good Efficacy and Tolerability.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Journal of Drugs in Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.36849/JDD.8219
James Q Del Rosso, Thu Q Nguyen, Christine Emesiani, Matthew Meckfessel
{"title":"A 2.6% Benzoyl Peroxide AV Cleanser Specifically Designed for Sensitive Skin Offers Good Efficacy and Tolerability.","authors":"James Q Del Rosso, Thu Q Nguyen, Christine Emesiani, Matthew Meckfessel","doi":"10.36849/JDD.8219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris (AV) is common among adults, and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) has a long history of efficacy in reducing AV lesions. The efficacy of BPO is comparable for concentrations from 2.5% to 10% used as leave-on therapy, but tolerability is usually best at lower concentrations formulated in well-designed vehicles and with newer formulation methods such as micronization. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of a 2.6% BPO cleanser (Complexion Clearing AV Cleanser, CCAC) in mild-to-moderate AV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, open-label, 4-week study of subjects aged 18 to 45 years (n=28) with self-perceived sensitive skin and mild-to-moderate AV. CCAC was applied twice daily (morning and evening) on damp skin. Assessments included lesion counts, clinical photography with porphyrin analysis, patient self-assessment questionnaires, collection of adverse events, and standard tolerability ratings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total lesion counts were significantly reduced by week 1 of CCAC cleanser use (-25.2%, P&lt;0.05). At week 4, AV lesions were numerically reduced but did not reach statistical significance. Additionally, there was a significant reduction of porphyrin counts at week 1 (-19.4% right side face, -28.8% left side, P&lt;0.05 vs baseline). CCAC was well tolerated, with no significant increase in tolerability ratings at any time point compared to baseline, and patients reported good satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CCAC was efficacious in reducing AV lesions in as little as one week, and a trend in reduction was shown through week 4. Additionally, this 2.6% BPO cleanser was also shown to be very well tolerated and well-liked by subjects with self-perceived sensitive skin. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(9):764-768. doi:10.36849/JDD.8219.</p>","PeriodicalId":15566,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.8219","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris (AV) is common among adults, and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) has a long history of efficacy in reducing AV lesions. The efficacy of BPO is comparable for concentrations from 2.5% to 10% used as leave-on therapy, but tolerability is usually best at lower concentrations formulated in well-designed vehicles and with newer formulation methods such as micronization. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of a 2.6% BPO cleanser (Complexion Clearing AV Cleanser, CCAC) in mild-to-moderate AV.

Methods: This was a single-center, open-label, 4-week study of subjects aged 18 to 45 years (n=28) with self-perceived sensitive skin and mild-to-moderate AV. CCAC was applied twice daily (morning and evening) on damp skin. Assessments included lesion counts, clinical photography with porphyrin analysis, patient self-assessment questionnaires, collection of adverse events, and standard tolerability ratings.

Results: Total lesion counts were significantly reduced by week 1 of CCAC cleanser use (-25.2%, P<0.05). At week 4, AV lesions were numerically reduced but did not reach statistical significance. Additionally, there was a significant reduction of porphyrin counts at week 1 (-19.4% right side face, -28.8% left side, P<0.05 vs baseline). CCAC was well tolerated, with no significant increase in tolerability ratings at any time point compared to baseline, and patients reported good satisfaction.

Conclusions: CCAC was efficacious in reducing AV lesions in as little as one week, and a trend in reduction was shown through week 4. Additionally, this 2.6% BPO cleanser was also shown to be very well tolerated and well-liked by subjects with self-perceived sensitive skin. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(9):764-768. doi:10.36849/JDD.8219.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专为敏感性皮肤设计的 2.6% 过氧苯甲酰 AV 清洁剂具有良好的功效和耐受性。
背景:轻度至中度的寻常痤疮(AV)在成年人中很常见,过氧化苯甲酰(BPO)在减轻 AV 病变方面具有悠久的疗效。过氧化苯甲酰(BPO)的浓度从 2.5% 到 10%,作为免洗疗法使用时疗效相当,但通常在设计良好的载体和采用微粉化等较新配制方法配制的较低浓度时,耐受性最好。本研究评估了2.6% BPO洁面乳(Complexion Clearing AV Cleanser,CCAC)对轻度至中度AV的疗效和安全性:这是一项单中心、开放标签、为期4周的研究,受试者年龄在18至45岁之间(28人),自我感觉皮肤敏感,患有轻度至中度AV。每天早晚两次在潮湿的皮肤上涂抹CCAC。评估包括皮损计数、卟啉分析临床照片、患者自我评估问卷、不良反应收集和标准耐受性评级:结果:使用CCAC洁面乳一周后,皮损总数明显减少(-25.2%,P<0.05)。第4周时,AV病变在数量上有所减少,但未达到统计学意义。此外,卟啉计数在第1周显著减少(右脸-19.4%,左脸-28.8%,与基线相比,P<0.05)。CCAC的耐受性良好,与基线相比,任何时间点的耐受性评分均无明显增加,患者满意度良好:结论:CCAC能在短短一周内有效减少房室病变,并在第四周出现减少趋势。此外,这种2.6% BPO洁面乳的耐受性也很好,深受自认为皮肤敏感的受试者的喜爱。J Drugs Dermatol.2024;23(9):764-768. doi:10.36849/JDD.8219.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Drugs in Dermatology (JDD) is a peer-reviewed publication indexed with MEDLINE®/PubMed® that was founded by the renowned Dr. Perry Robins MD. Founded in 2002, it offers one of the fastest routes to disseminate dermatologic information and is considered the fastest growing publication in dermatology. We present original articles, award-winning case reports, and timely features pertaining to new methods, techniques, drug therapy, and devices in dermatology that provide readers with peer reviewed content of the utmost quality. Our high standards of content are maintained through a balanced, peer-review process. Articles are reviewed by an International Editorial Board of over 160 renowned experts.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Topical Finasteride 0.25% With Minoxidil 5% Versus Topical Minoxidil 5% Alone in Treatment of Male Pattern Androgenic Alopecia. From CO2 to Er:YAG: A Comprehensive Review of Laser Treatments for Rhinophyma. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for the Dermatologist: Uses and Considerations. INDIVIDUAL ARTICLE: All for One and One for All: The Three Musketeers of Topical Acne Treatment and the Current Landscape. A Review of Energy-Based Device Interventions to Treat Keloid Scars.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1