Algorithmic Beauty: The New Beauty Standard.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Journal of Drugs in Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.36849/JDD.8074
Alisen Huang, Sabrina Fabi
{"title":"Algorithmic Beauty: The New Beauty Standard.","authors":"Alisen Huang, Sabrina Fabi","doi":"10.36849/JDD.8074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Algorithms on various social media platforms feed users what it considers \"beautiful\", impacting the aesthetic desires of patients as well as beauty ideals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To discuss how algorithms on social media platforms personalize feeds and influence a patient's preference for procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok's websites were searched for how their algorithms function. A narrative review of the literature pertaining to social media and cosmetic procedures was also conducted using PubMed.</p><p><strong>Results/discussion: </strong>Social media platforms personalize feeds for their users. Identifying exactly what a patient is exposed to on social media and how that influences their preference for cosmetic procedures presents a challenge at various levels. Social media usage appears to at least influence cosmetic procedure consideration. The desired appearance may be impacted by location, repeated exposure, and familiarity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While impossible to predict the next beauty trend, it is important to understand how algorithms and artificial intelligence may play an increasing role in a patient&rsquo;s visual diet and how their aesthetic goals are thereby affected. Using social media platforms and understanding market trends can guide dermatologists to provide evidence-based education, dispel misinformation, and anchor patients in reality while understanding the cosmetic procedures that patients seek. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(9):742-746.&nbsp; doi:10.36849/JDD.8074.</p>","PeriodicalId":15566,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.8074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Algorithms on various social media platforms feed users what it considers "beautiful", impacting the aesthetic desires of patients as well as beauty ideals.

Objective: To discuss how algorithms on social media platforms personalize feeds and influence a patient's preference for procedures.

Methods: YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok's websites were searched for how their algorithms function. A narrative review of the literature pertaining to social media and cosmetic procedures was also conducted using PubMed.

Results/discussion: Social media platforms personalize feeds for their users. Identifying exactly what a patient is exposed to on social media and how that influences their preference for cosmetic procedures presents a challenge at various levels. Social media usage appears to at least influence cosmetic procedure consideration. The desired appearance may be impacted by location, repeated exposure, and familiarity.

Conclusion: While impossible to predict the next beauty trend, it is important to understand how algorithms and artificial intelligence may play an increasing role in a patient’s visual diet and how their aesthetic goals are thereby affected. Using social media platforms and understanding market trends can guide dermatologists to provide evidence-based education, dispel misinformation, and anchor patients in reality while understanding the cosmetic procedures that patients seek. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(9):742-746.  doi:10.36849/JDD.8074.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
算法之美:新的美容标准
背景:各种社交媒体平台上的算法向用户提供其认为的 "美",从而影响患者的审美欲望和美容理想:讨论社交媒体平台上的算法如何使信息内容个性化并影响患者对手术的偏好:对 YouTube、Instagram 和 TikTok 的网站进行了搜索,以了解它们的算法是如何运作的。此外,还使用 PubMed 对有关社交媒体和美容程序的文献进行了叙述性综述:社交媒体平台为用户提供个性化信息。准确识别患者在社交媒体上接触到的内容,以及这些内容如何影响他们对美容手术的偏好,在不同层面上都是一个挑战。社交媒体的使用似乎至少会影响对美容手术的考虑。理想的外观可能会受到地点、反复接触和熟悉程度的影响:虽然无法预测下一个美容趋势,但重要的是要了解算法和人工智能如何在患者的视觉饮食中发挥越来越大的作用,以及他们的美容目标如何因此受到影响。利用社交媒体平台和了解市场趋势可以指导皮肤科医生提供循证教育、消除错误信息,并在了解患者所寻求的美容程序的同时让患者立足于现实。J Drugs Dermatol.2024;23(9):742-746.  doi:10.36849/JDD.8074.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Drugs in Dermatology (JDD) is a peer-reviewed publication indexed with MEDLINE®/PubMed® that was founded by the renowned Dr. Perry Robins MD. Founded in 2002, it offers one of the fastest routes to disseminate dermatologic information and is considered the fastest growing publication in dermatology. We present original articles, award-winning case reports, and timely features pertaining to new methods, techniques, drug therapy, and devices in dermatology that provide readers with peer reviewed content of the utmost quality. Our high standards of content are maintained through a balanced, peer-review process. Articles are reviewed by an International Editorial Board of over 160 renowned experts.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Topical Finasteride 0.25% With Minoxidil 5% Versus Topical Minoxidil 5% Alone in Treatment of Male Pattern Androgenic Alopecia. From CO2 to Er:YAG: A Comprehensive Review of Laser Treatments for Rhinophyma. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for the Dermatologist: Uses and Considerations. INDIVIDUAL ARTICLE: All for One and One for All: The Three Musketeers of Topical Acne Treatment and the Current Landscape. A Review of Energy-Based Device Interventions to Treat Keloid Scars.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1