Predicting Mortality in Sepsis-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Machine Learning Approach Using the MIMIC-III Database.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1177/08850666241281060
Shengtian Mu, Dongli Yan, Jie Tang, Zhen Zheng
{"title":"Predicting Mortality in Sepsis-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Machine Learning Approach Using the MIMIC-III Database.","authors":"Shengtian Mu, Dongli Yan, Jie Tang, Zhen Zheng","doi":"10.1177/08850666241281060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To develop and validate a mortality prediction model for patients with sepsis-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 2466 patients diagnosed with sepsis and ARDS within 24 h of ICU admission. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters were extracted from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. Feature selection was performed using the Boruta algorithm, followed by the construction of seven ML models: logistic regression, Naive Bayes, k-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, decision tree, Random Forest, and extreme gradient boosting. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified 24 variables significantly associated with mortality. The optimal ML model, a Random Forest model, demonstrated an AUC of 0.8015 in the test set, with high accuracy and specificity. The model highlighted the importance of blood urea nitrogen, age, urine output, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, and albumin levels in predicting mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The model's superior predictive performance underscores the potential for integrating advanced analytics into clinical decision-making processes, potentially improving patient outcomes and resource allocation in critical care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666241281060"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241281060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To develop and validate a mortality prediction model for patients with sepsis-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 2466 patients diagnosed with sepsis and ARDS within 24 h of ICU admission. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters were extracted from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. Feature selection was performed using the Boruta algorithm, followed by the construction of seven ML models: logistic regression, Naive Bayes, k-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, decision tree, Random Forest, and extreme gradient boosting. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

Results: The study identified 24 variables significantly associated with mortality. The optimal ML model, a Random Forest model, demonstrated an AUC of 0.8015 in the test set, with high accuracy and specificity. The model highlighted the importance of blood urea nitrogen, age, urine output, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, and albumin levels in predicting mortality.

Conclusions: The model's superior predictive performance underscores the potential for integrating advanced analytics into clinical decision-making processes, potentially improving patient outcomes and resource allocation in critical care settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测败血症相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征的死亡率:使用 MIMIC-III 数据库的机器学习方法。
背景:开发并验证脓毒症相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者死亡率预测模型:开发并验证脓毒症相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的死亡率预测模型:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了 2466 名在入住重症监护室 24 小时内被诊断为脓毒症和 ARDS 的患者。研究人员从重症监护医学信息市场 III(MIMIC-III)数据库中提取了人口统计学、临床和实验室参数。使用 Boruta 算法进行特征选择,然后构建了七个多重多重模型:逻辑回归、Naive Bayes、k-近邻、支持向量机、决策树、随机森林和极端梯度提升。使用接收者操作特征曲线下面积、准确性、灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值对模型性能进行评估:结果:研究发现了 24 个与死亡率明显相关的变量。最佳的 ML 模型(随机森林模型)在测试集中的 AUC 为 0.8015,具有较高的准确性和特异性。该模型强调了血尿素氮、年龄、尿量、简化急性生理学评分 II 和白蛋白水平在预测死亡率方面的重要性:该模型卓越的预测性能凸显了将高级分析技术整合到临床决策过程中的潜力,有可能改善重症监护环境中的患者预后和资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of Dexmedetomidine in non-Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Critically ill Patients: A Multicentre Cohort Study. Spinal Cord Injury Following Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An Overlooked and Underreported Complication. Ultrasound-Guided Venous Catheter Placement in Prone Position. Assessing the Role of Blood Gas Analysis in COVID-19 Patients for Early Warning and Clinical Guidance. Bacterial Superinfections in Critically Ill Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1