Secondary outcomes of scoliosis surgery in disease-modifying treatment-naïve patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 2 and nonambulant type 3.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Muscle & Nerve Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1002/mus.28238
Chiara Brusa, Giovanni Baranello, Deborah Ridout, Julie de Graaf, Adnan Y Manzur, Pinki Munot, Anna Sarkozy, Marion Main, Evelin Milev, Mario Iodice, Danielle Ramsey, Stewart Tucker, Tom Ember, Ramesh Nadarajah, Francesco Muntoni, Mariacristina Scoto
{"title":"Secondary outcomes of scoliosis surgery in disease-modifying treatment-naïve patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 2 and nonambulant type 3.","authors":"Chiara Brusa, Giovanni Baranello, Deborah Ridout, Julie de Graaf, Adnan Y Manzur, Pinki Munot, Anna Sarkozy, Marion Main, Evelin Milev, Mario Iodice, Danielle Ramsey, Stewart Tucker, Tom Ember, Ramesh Nadarajah, Francesco Muntoni, Mariacristina Scoto","doi":"10.1002/mus.28238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>Available studies on scoliosis surgery in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) have focused on the primary outcome of the procedure-the correction of the curve-whereas research focusing on secondary outcomes is scarce. We aimed to investigate postsurgical changes in respiratory function, motor function, weight, pain, and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the clinical notes of 32 disease-modifying treatment-naïve patients (26 SMA2, 6 nonambulant SMA3). We also performed investigator-developed phone interviews and conducted a focus group with families on postsurgical satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean annual rate of forced vital capacity percent decline improved in SMA2: -3.2% postsurgery versus -6.9% presurgery (p < .001), with similar trajectories in SMA3. Gross motor functional scores (Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale) available in 12/32 dropped immediately after surgery: median loss of 6.5 points, with relatively spared upper limb function. Weight z-scores postsurgery dropped in 16/32, requiring food supplements (5/16); one/16 lost >5% of total weight requiring gastrostomy. Postsurgical pain was frequently reported, especially hip pain (13/32). Overall, 10/10 patients/parents participating in the phone interview rated the procedure as very successful for posture and physical appearance. Nonetheless, 7/10 reported postsurgical pain, reduced mobility, and unmet care needs. The seven patients/parents attending the focus group highlighted lack of intensive physiotherapy programs, occupational therapy assistance, and psychological support as postsurgical unmet care needs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study reports a positive impact of scoliosis surgery on respiratory function and overall satisfaction with posture and physical appearance. The observed negative impact on the other outcomes highlights the importance of multidisciplinary approaches to improve postoperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":18968,"journal":{"name":"Muscle & Nerve","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muscle & Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28238","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/aims: Available studies on scoliosis surgery in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) have focused on the primary outcome of the procedure-the correction of the curve-whereas research focusing on secondary outcomes is scarce. We aimed to investigate postsurgical changes in respiratory function, motor function, weight, pain, and satisfaction.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical notes of 32 disease-modifying treatment-naïve patients (26 SMA2, 6 nonambulant SMA3). We also performed investigator-developed phone interviews and conducted a focus group with families on postsurgical satisfaction.

Results: Mean annual rate of forced vital capacity percent decline improved in SMA2: -3.2% postsurgery versus -6.9% presurgery (p < .001), with similar trajectories in SMA3. Gross motor functional scores (Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale) available in 12/32 dropped immediately after surgery: median loss of 6.5 points, with relatively spared upper limb function. Weight z-scores postsurgery dropped in 16/32, requiring food supplements (5/16); one/16 lost >5% of total weight requiring gastrostomy. Postsurgical pain was frequently reported, especially hip pain (13/32). Overall, 10/10 patients/parents participating in the phone interview rated the procedure as very successful for posture and physical appearance. Nonetheless, 7/10 reported postsurgical pain, reduced mobility, and unmet care needs. The seven patients/parents attending the focus group highlighted lack of intensive physiotherapy programs, occupational therapy assistance, and psychological support as postsurgical unmet care needs.

Discussion: This study reports a positive impact of scoliosis surgery on respiratory function and overall satisfaction with posture and physical appearance. The observed negative impact on the other outcomes highlights the importance of multidisciplinary approaches to improve postoperative management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓性肌肉萎缩症2型和3型非游走性脊髓性肌肉萎缩症患者接受脊柱侧弯手术后的次要疗效。
引言/目的:关于脊髓性肌肉萎缩症(SMA)脊柱侧弯手术的现有研究主要集中在手术的主要结果--曲线矫正上,而对次要结果的研究却很少。我们旨在调查手术后呼吸功能、运动功能、体重、疼痛和满意度的变化:我们回顾性地查看了 32 名未接受过疾病修饰治疗的患者(26 名 SMA2,6 名 SMA3)的临床记录。我们还进行了研究人员开发的电话访谈,并就手术后的满意度与家属进行了焦点小组讨论:结果:SMA2患者的年平均用力生命容量下降率有所改善:术后为-3.2%,而术前为-6.9%(P 5%的总重量需要进行胃造口术)。手术后疼痛的报告很常见,尤其是臀部疼痛(13/32)。总体而言,参加电话访谈的 10/10 名患者/家长都认为手术在姿势和外貌方面非常成功。然而,7/10 的患者报告了术后疼痛、行动不便和未满足的护理需求。参加焦点小组讨论的七位患者/家长强调,手术后未满足的护理需求包括缺乏强化物理治疗计划、职业治疗援助和心理支持:讨论:本研究报告显示,脊柱侧弯手术对呼吸功能以及姿势和身体外观的整体满意度产生了积极影响。观察到的对其他结果的负面影响凸显了多学科方法对改善术后管理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Muscle & Nerve
Muscle & Nerve 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
287
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Muscle & Nerve is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions, in both health and disease, concerning studies of the muscle, the neuromuscular junction, the peripheral motor, sensory and autonomic neurons, and the central nervous system where the behavior of the peripheral nervous system is clarified. Appearing monthly, Muscle & Nerve publishes clinical studies and clinically relevant research reports in the fields of anatomy, biochemistry, cell biology, electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, toxicology, and virology. The Journal welcomes articles and reports on basic clinical electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis. We expedite some papers dealing with timely topics to keep up with the fast-moving pace of science, based on the referees'' recommendation.
期刊最新文献
Lower limb nerve ultrasound: A four-way comparison of acquired and inherited axonopathy, inherited neuronopathy and healthy controls. Test-retest and inter-rater reliability of two devices measuring tactile mechanical detection thresholds in healthy adults: Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and the cutaneous mechanical stimulator. Neuroma morphology: A macroscopic classification system. Access for ALL in ALS: A large-scale, inclusive, collaborative consortium to unlock the molecular and genetic mechanisms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The impact of genotype on age at loss of ambulation in individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy treated with corticosteroids: A single‐center study of 555 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1