Federico Longo, Emanuele Castelli, Daniel Dean Lewis, Caleb C Hudson, Stanley Eunwoo Kim, Antonio Pozzi
{"title":"Minimally invasive tarsal arthrodesis in 15 dogs.","authors":"Federico Longo, Emanuele Castelli, Daniel Dean Lewis, Caleb C Hudson, Stanley Eunwoo Kim, Antonio Pozzi","doi":"10.1111/vsu.14161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the present study was to report the outcomes and complications of minimally invasive tarsal arthrodesis (MITA) in dogs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Bi-institutional retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong>A total of 15 client-owned dogs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of dogs undergoing MITA were reviewed to determine outcome and complications. Radiographs were recommended every 4 weeks until clinical union and reviewed to evaluate tibiotarsometatarsal alignment, implant position, subsequent osseous union of the debrided articulations. Time to clinical union and complications were recorded. Clinical union was defined as functional weightbearing limb use with at least 50% of osseous union. Final limb function was defined as full, acceptable, or unacceptable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Partial tarsal arthrodesis was performed in 10 cases and pantarsal arthrodesis in five cases. Postoperative swelling was minimal. Most complications, 26% major and 40% minor, were implant-related, and explant was required in three dogs. No catastrophic complications occurred. Mean (±sd) radiographic follow-up was 11.4 (±13.1) months Mean (±sd) time to radiographic osseous union was 1.8 (±0.5) months. Mean (±sd) time to clinical union was 3.7 (±0.8) months. Physiological alignment was restored in 12/15 dogs. Complete radiographic union occurred in 46% while in the remaining 54% obtained partial radiographic union, but clinical instability was not observed. Limb function was considered full in six and acceptable in eight dogs. Function was unacceptable in one dog, but the cause was not related to MITA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MITA resulted in restoration of alignment, which was accomplished using MITA techniques. Furthermore, MITA appeared to result in faster healing times and reduced soft tissue complications compared to conventional open approach arthrodesis.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>MITA may be considered as an option to obtain functional arthrodesis in dogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14161","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the present study was to report the outcomes and complications of minimally invasive tarsal arthrodesis (MITA) in dogs.
Study design: Bi-institutional retrospective study.
Sample population: A total of 15 client-owned dogs.
Methods: Medical records of dogs undergoing MITA were reviewed to determine outcome and complications. Radiographs were recommended every 4 weeks until clinical union and reviewed to evaluate tibiotarsometatarsal alignment, implant position, subsequent osseous union of the debrided articulations. Time to clinical union and complications were recorded. Clinical union was defined as functional weightbearing limb use with at least 50% of osseous union. Final limb function was defined as full, acceptable, or unacceptable.
Results: Partial tarsal arthrodesis was performed in 10 cases and pantarsal arthrodesis in five cases. Postoperative swelling was minimal. Most complications, 26% major and 40% minor, were implant-related, and explant was required in three dogs. No catastrophic complications occurred. Mean (±sd) radiographic follow-up was 11.4 (±13.1) months Mean (±sd) time to radiographic osseous union was 1.8 (±0.5) months. Mean (±sd) time to clinical union was 3.7 (±0.8) months. Physiological alignment was restored in 12/15 dogs. Complete radiographic union occurred in 46% while in the remaining 54% obtained partial radiographic union, but clinical instability was not observed. Limb function was considered full in six and acceptable in eight dogs. Function was unacceptable in one dog, but the cause was not related to MITA.
Conclusion: MITA resulted in restoration of alignment, which was accomplished using MITA techniques. Furthermore, MITA appeared to result in faster healing times and reduced soft tissue complications compared to conventional open approach arthrodesis.
Clinical significance: MITA may be considered as an option to obtain functional arthrodesis in dogs.
研究目的本研究旨在报告狗微创跗关节置换术(MITA)的结果和并发症:研究设计:双机构回顾性研究:抽样人群:共15只客户饲养的狗:方法:回顾接受 MITA 手术的狗的医疗记录,以确定结果和并发症。建议每 4 周拍摄一次 X 光片,直至临床骨结合,并对其进行复查,以评估胫跖骨对齐情况、植入物的位置以及剥离关节的后续骨结合情况。临床愈合时间和并发症均被记录在案。临床愈合的定义是肢体负重功能正常,骨性愈合至少达到 50%。最终肢体功能被定义为完全、可接受或不可接受:结果:10 个病例进行了部分跗关节置换术,5 个病例进行了泛跗关节置换术。术后肿胀很小。大多数并发症(26%为主要并发症,40%为轻微并发症)都与植入物有关,有三只狗需要更换植入物。没有发生灾难性并发症。平均(±sd)骨结合时间为 1.8(±0.5)个月。平均(±sd)临床结合时间为 3.7(±0.8)个月。12/15只狗恢复了生理排列。46%的狗实现了完全放射学结合,其余54%的狗实现了部分放射学结合,但未观察到临床不稳定性。六只狗的肢体功能完全恢复,八只狗的肢体功能可以接受。一只狗的功能不可接受,但原因与 MITA 无关:结论:使用 MITA 技术可以恢复对齐。此外,与传统的开放式关节置换术相比,MITA似乎能缩短愈合时间,减少软组织并发症:临床意义:MITA可作为狗进行功能性关节置换术的一种选择。
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations.
It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.