[Clinical efficacy and safety of liposomal amphotericin B in the salvage treatment of invasive fungal disease in patients with hematological diseases].

Y B Wu, S S Jiang, Y X Wu, B Liu, Y T Jing, H Y Bao, X Ma, D P Wu, X H Hu
{"title":"[Clinical efficacy and safety of liposomal amphotericin B in the salvage treatment of invasive fungal disease in patients with hematological diseases].","authors":"Y B Wu, S S Jiang, Y X Wu, B Liu, Y T Jing, H Y Bao, X Ma, D P Wu, X H Hu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20240228-00075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the efficacy and safety of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) for the salvage treatment of invasive fungal disease (IFD) in patients with hematological diseases. <b>Methods:</b> Data were retrospectively collected from 80 patients with hematological issues treated with L-AmB between June 2023 and December 2023 after failure of previous antifungal therapy. Baseline patient information, clinical efficacy, and factors affecting the efficacy of L-AmB were analyzed by logistic regression. Moreover, adverse effects associated with L-AmB were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> Among the 80 patients, 9 (11.2%) had proven IFD, 43 (53.8%) had probable IFD, and 28 (35.0%) had possible IFD. The efficacy rate of L-AmB salvage therapy for IFD was 77.5%, with a median daily dose of 3 (range: 1-5) mg·kg(-1)·d(-1) and a median dosing course of 14 (range: 8-25) days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the disease remission status (<i>OR</i>=4.337, 95% <i>CI</i> 1.167-16.122, <i>P</i>=0.029) and duration of medication (<i>OR</i>=1.127, 95% <i>CI</i> 1.029-1.234, <i>P</i>=0.010) were independent factors affecting the efficacy of L-AmB. The incidence of infusion reactions associated with L-AmB, including fever and chills, was 5.0%. The incidence of hypokalemia was 28.8% (predominantly grades 1-2), and the incidence of nephrotoxicity was 11.3% (predominantly grades 1-2) . <b>Conclusion:</b> L-AmB is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with IFD who are intolerant to or who have experienced no effect of previous antifungal therapy, with a low rate of adverse reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":24016,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi","volume":"45 7","pages":"666-671"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11388130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20240228-00075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) for the salvage treatment of invasive fungal disease (IFD) in patients with hematological diseases. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from 80 patients with hematological issues treated with L-AmB between June 2023 and December 2023 after failure of previous antifungal therapy. Baseline patient information, clinical efficacy, and factors affecting the efficacy of L-AmB were analyzed by logistic regression. Moreover, adverse effects associated with L-AmB were evaluated. Results: Among the 80 patients, 9 (11.2%) had proven IFD, 43 (53.8%) had probable IFD, and 28 (35.0%) had possible IFD. The efficacy rate of L-AmB salvage therapy for IFD was 77.5%, with a median daily dose of 3 (range: 1-5) mg·kg(-1)·d(-1) and a median dosing course of 14 (range: 8-25) days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the disease remission status (OR=4.337, 95% CI 1.167-16.122, P=0.029) and duration of medication (OR=1.127, 95% CI 1.029-1.234, P=0.010) were independent factors affecting the efficacy of L-AmB. The incidence of infusion reactions associated with L-AmB, including fever and chills, was 5.0%. The incidence of hypokalemia was 28.8% (predominantly grades 1-2), and the incidence of nephrotoxicity was 11.3% (predominantly grades 1-2) . Conclusion: L-AmB is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with IFD who are intolerant to or who have experienced no effect of previous antifungal therapy, with a low rate of adverse reactions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[脂质体两性霉素 B 挽救治疗血液病患者侵袭性真菌病的临床疗效和安全性]。
目的研究脂质体两性霉素 B(L-AmB)用于血液病患者侵袭性真菌病(IFD)抢救性治疗的有效性和安全性。研究方法在2023年6月至2023年12月期间,回顾性收集了80名血液病患者在既往抗真菌治疗失败后接受L-AmB治疗的数据。通过逻辑回归分析了患者基线信息、临床疗效以及影响L-AmB疗效的因素。此外,还评估了与 L-AmB 相关的不良反应。结果80 名患者中,9 人(11.2%)已证实患有 IFD,43 人(53.8%)可能患有 IFD,28 人(35.0%)可能患有 IFD。L-AmB挽救治疗IFD的有效率为77.5%,中位日剂量为3(范围:1-5)mg-kg(-1)-d(-1),中位用药疗程为14(范围:8-25)天。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,疾病缓解状态(OR=4.337,95% CI 1.167-16.122,P=0.029)和用药时间(OR=1.127,95% CI 1.029-1.234,P=0.010)是影响 L-AmB 疗效的独立因素。与L-AmB相关的输液反应(包括发热和寒战)发生率为5.0%。低钾血症发生率为28.8%(主要为1-2级),肾毒性发生率为11.3%(主要为1-2级)。结论L-氨溴索治疗不耐受或既往抗真菌治疗无效的 IFD 患者安全有效,不良反应发生率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
期刊最新文献
[Research on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of children with chronic myeloid leukemia in the blast phase]. [Single-center study of COVID-19 in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia]. [The advancement of cuproptosis in hematological tumors]. [Phylogenetic analysis and pathogenesis study of a new deletion mutation causing inherited FⅩ deficiency]. [Prognostic analysis of 19 newly treated multiple myeloma patients with t(14; 16)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1