A cross-sectional quantitative analysis of the readability and quality of online resources regarding thumb carpometacarpal joint replacement surgery.

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY Journal of Hand and Microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-06-26 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jham.2024.100119
Brandon Lim, Suddhajit Sen
{"title":"A cross-sectional quantitative analysis of the readability and quality of online resources regarding thumb carpometacarpal joint replacement surgery.","authors":"Brandon Lim, Suddhajit Sen","doi":"10.1016/j.jham.2024.100119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis is a common degenerative condition that affects up to 15 ​% of the population older than 30 years. Poor readability of online health resources has been associated with misinformation, inappropriate care, incorrect self-treatment, worse health outcomes, and increased healthcare resource waste. This study aims to assess the readability and quality of online information regarding thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint replacement surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The terms \"thumb joint replacement surgery\", \"thumb carpometacarpal joint replacement surgery\", \"thumb cmc joint replacement surgery\", \"thumb arthroplasty\", \"thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty\", and \"thumb cmc arthroplasty\" were searched in Google and Bing. Readability was determined using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level (FKGL). FRES >65 or a grade level score of sixth grade and under was considered acceptable. Quality was assessed using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) and a modified DISCERN tool. PEMAT scores below 70 were considered poorly understandable and poorly actionable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 34 websites underwent qualitative analysis. The average FRES was 54.60 ​± ​7.91 (range 30.30-67.80). Only 3 (8.82 ​%) websites had a FRES score >65. The average FKGL score was 8.19 ​± ​1.80 (range 5.60-12.90). Only 3 (8.82 ​%) websites were written at or below a sixth-grade level. The average PEMAT percentage score for understandability and actionability was 76.82 ​± ​9.43 (range 61.54-93.75) and 36.18 ​± ​24.12 (range 0.00-60.00) respectively. Although 22 (64.71 ​%) of websites met the acceptable standard of 70 ​% for understandability, none of the websites met the acceptable standard of 70 ​% for actionability. The average total DISCERN score was 32.00 ​± ​4.29 (range 24.00-42.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most websites reviewed were written above recommended reading levels. Most showed acceptable understandability but none showed acceptable actionability. To avoid the negative outcomes of poor patient understanding of online resources, providers of these resources should optimise accessibility to the average reader by using simple words, avoiding jargon, and analysing texts with readability software before publishing the materials online. Websites should also utilise visual aids and provide clearer pre-operative and post-operative instructions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","volume":"16 4","pages":"100119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11369735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jham.2024.100119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis is a common degenerative condition that affects up to 15 ​% of the population older than 30 years. Poor readability of online health resources has been associated with misinformation, inappropriate care, incorrect self-treatment, worse health outcomes, and increased healthcare resource waste. This study aims to assess the readability and quality of online information regarding thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint replacement surgery.

Methods: The terms "thumb joint replacement surgery", "thumb carpometacarpal joint replacement surgery", "thumb cmc joint replacement surgery", "thumb arthroplasty", "thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty", and "thumb cmc arthroplasty" were searched in Google and Bing. Readability was determined using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level (FKGL). FRES >65 or a grade level score of sixth grade and under was considered acceptable. Quality was assessed using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) and a modified DISCERN tool. PEMAT scores below 70 were considered poorly understandable and poorly actionable.

Results: A total of 34 websites underwent qualitative analysis. The average FRES was 54.60 ​± ​7.91 (range 30.30-67.80). Only 3 (8.82 ​%) websites had a FRES score >65. The average FKGL score was 8.19 ​± ​1.80 (range 5.60-12.90). Only 3 (8.82 ​%) websites were written at or below a sixth-grade level. The average PEMAT percentage score for understandability and actionability was 76.82 ​± ​9.43 (range 61.54-93.75) and 36.18 ​± ​24.12 (range 0.00-60.00) respectively. Although 22 (64.71 ​%) of websites met the acceptable standard of 70 ​% for understandability, none of the websites met the acceptable standard of 70 ​% for actionability. The average total DISCERN score was 32.00 ​± ​4.29 (range 24.00-42.00).

Conclusions: Most websites reviewed were written above recommended reading levels. Most showed acceptable understandability but none showed acceptable actionability. To avoid the negative outcomes of poor patient understanding of online resources, providers of these resources should optimise accessibility to the average reader by using simple words, avoiding jargon, and analysing texts with readability software before publishing the materials online. Websites should also utilise visual aids and provide clearer pre-operative and post-operative instructions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对有关拇指腕掌关节置换手术的在线资源的可读性和质量进行横向定量分析。
背景:拇指腕掌(CMC)关节骨关节炎是一种常见的退行性病变,30 岁以上人群中患病率高达 15%。在线医疗资源的可读性差与信息错误、护理不当、自我治疗不正确、健康状况恶化和医疗资源浪费增加有关。本研究旨在评估有关拇指腕掌(CMC)关节置换手术的在线信息的可读性和质量:方法:在谷歌和必应中搜索 "拇指关节置换手术"、"拇指腕掌关节置换手术"、"拇指cmc关节置换手术"、"拇指关节成形术"、"拇指腕掌关节成形术 "和 "拇指cmc关节成形术"。使用弗莱什阅读容易程度评分(FRES)和弗莱什-金凯德阅读等级评分(FKGL)确定可读性。FRES>65或六年级及以下的年级分数被认为是可接受的。质量评估采用患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)和改进的 DISCERN 工具。PEMAT 得分低于 70 分被认为可理解性和可操作性较差:共有 34 个网站接受了定性分析。平均 FRES 为 54.60 ± 7.91(范围为 30.30-67.80)。只有 3 个网站(8.82%)的 FRES 分数大于 65 分。FKGL 平均得分为 8.19 ± 1.80(范围为 5.60-12.90)。只有 3 个(8.82%)网站的写作水平达到或低于六年级水平。可理解性和可操作性的 PEMAT 百分比平均得分分别为 76.82 ± 9.43(范围 61.54-93.75)和 36.18 ± 24.12(范围 0.00-60.00)。虽然有 22 个网站(64.71%)在可理解性方面达到了 70% 的可接受标准,但没有一个网站在可操作性方面达到了 70% 的可接受标准。DISCERN 的平均总分为 32.00 ± 4.29(范围为 24.00-42.00):结论:所审查的大多数网站都高于建议的阅读水平。大多数网站的可理解性可以接受,但没有一个网站的可操作性可以接受。为避免患者对在线资源理解不透而产生负面结果,这些资源的提供者应通过使用简单的词语、避免行话以及在网上发布资料前使用可读性软件分析文本等方式,优化普通读者的可读性。网站还应利用视觉辅助工具,提供更清晰的术前和术后说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
The modified placenta model for microsurgery training: Recommended methods for comprehensive microsurgery experience. Ulnar shaft diameter as it relates to plate osteosynthesis: A cadaveric study. A cross-sectional quantitative analysis of the readability and quality of online resources regarding thumb carpometacarpal joint replacement surgery. Diagnostic and management strategies for pseudoaneurysm of the ulnar artery: A scoping review. Predictors of leech therapy failure in revascularized and replanted digits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1