Microstructural and flexural strength of various CAD-CAM lithium disilicate ceramics.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1111/jopr.13938
Joissi Ferrari Zaniboni, Amanda Soares Silva, Aryvelto Miranda Silva, João Felipe Besegato, Oscar Fernando Muñoz-Chávez, Edson Alves de Campos
{"title":"Microstructural and flexural strength of various CAD-CAM lithium disilicate ceramics.","authors":"Joissi Ferrari Zaniboni, Amanda Soares Silva, Aryvelto Miranda Silva, João Felipe Besegato, Oscar Fernando Muñoz-Chávez, Edson Alves de Campos","doi":"10.1111/jopr.13938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the microstructural and mechanical properties of various commercial trademarks of lithium disilicate ceramics for CAD-CAM systems.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Specimens of different lithium disilicate ceramics were obtained and randomized into 5 groups (n = 14): EM: e.max CAD; RT: Rosetta SM; EV: Evolith; PM: Smile-Lithium CAD; and, HS: HaHaSmile. The microstructural analysis was performed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM); for flexural strength, the three-point bending flexure test was used. XRD and SEM data were qualitatively evaluated. Data from flexural strength were assessed with one-way ANOVA test (α = 0.05) and Weibull analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High peaks corresponding to the lithium metasilicate and lithium disilicate pattern with similar intensities were observed in all ceramics in the XRD analysis. SEM images showed similar patterns of crystalline structure in the EM and RT ceramics, while the other three groups presented different crystal morphologies than the previous ones and were similar to each other. No differences were found in flexural strength among the groups (p = 0.28).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CAD-CAM lithium disilicate ceramics showed comparable crystalline intensities. The microstructure of the EM and RT ceramics were different from the other groups. Flexural strength was similar among all ceramics.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13938","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the microstructural and mechanical properties of various commercial trademarks of lithium disilicate ceramics for CAD-CAM systems.

Materials and methods: Specimens of different lithium disilicate ceramics were obtained and randomized into 5 groups (n = 14): EM: e.max CAD; RT: Rosetta SM; EV: Evolith; PM: Smile-Lithium CAD; and, HS: HaHaSmile. The microstructural analysis was performed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM); for flexural strength, the three-point bending flexure test was used. XRD and SEM data were qualitatively evaluated. Data from flexural strength were assessed with one-way ANOVA test (α = 0.05) and Weibull analysis.

Results: High peaks corresponding to the lithium metasilicate and lithium disilicate pattern with similar intensities were observed in all ceramics in the XRD analysis. SEM images showed similar patterns of crystalline structure in the EM and RT ceramics, while the other three groups presented different crystal morphologies than the previous ones and were similar to each other. No differences were found in flexural strength among the groups (p = 0.28).

Conclusions: The CAD-CAM lithium disilicate ceramics showed comparable crystalline intensities. The microstructure of the EM and RT ceramics were different from the other groups. Flexural strength was similar among all ceramics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各种 CAD-CAM 二硅酸锂陶瓷的微结构和抗弯强度。
目的:分析用于 CAD-CAM 系统的各种二硅酸锂陶瓷商业商标的微观结构和机械性能:获得不同二硅酸锂陶瓷的试样,并随机分为 5 组(n = 14):EM:e.max CAD;RT:EV:Evolith;PM:EV:Evolith;PM:Smile-Lithium CAD;HS:HaHaSmile。微观结构分析采用 X 射线衍射(XRD)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM);抗弯强度采用三点弯曲抗弯试验。对 X 射线衍射和扫描电子显微镜数据进行了定性评估。弯曲强度数据采用单因素方差分析(α = 0.05)和 Weibull 分析进行评估:在 XRD 分析中,所有陶瓷都观察到了与偏硅酸锂和二硅酸锂模式相对应的峰值,且强度相似。扫描电子显微镜图像显示,EM 陶瓷和 RT 陶瓷的晶体结构形态相似,而其他三组陶瓷的晶体形态与前者不同,彼此相似。各组之间的抗弯强度没有差异(p = 0.28):结论:CAD-CAM 二硅酸锂陶瓷的结晶强度相当。结论:CAD-CAM 二硅酸锂陶瓷的结晶强度相当,EM 和 RT 陶瓷的微观结构与其他组不同。所有陶瓷的抗弯强度相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.
期刊最新文献
Effect of magnetic resonance imaging protocol on decision-making for positioning of dental implants in edentulous cases. Utilization of digitally milled verification jigs for recording jaw relations in complete-arch implant rehabilitation: A digital clinical report. Influence of the post-processing protocol on a biocompatible 3D-printed resin. Intraoral scanning for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses (ISCFDPs): Four clinical reports. Accuracy of intraoral versus desktop scanners used in digitizing polyvinyl siloxane impression for fabricating a CAD-CAM customized post and core.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1