Inpatient Care and Outcomes Among People With Cancer Experiencing Homelessness.

IF 28.4 1区 医学 Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Jama Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.3645
Kanan Shah, Patricia Mae G Santos, Lillian A Boe, Justin M Barnes, Anna Tao, C Jillian Tsai, Fumiko Chino
{"title":"Inpatient Care and Outcomes Among People With Cancer Experiencing Homelessness.","authors":"Kanan Shah, Patricia Mae G Santos, Lillian A Boe, Justin M Barnes, Anna Tao, C Jillian Tsai, Fumiko Chino","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.3645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Cancer is a leading cause of death among people experiencing homelessness (PEH) in the US. Acute care settings are important sources of care for PEH; however, the association of housing status with inpatient care remains understudied, particularly in the context of cancer.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether housing status is associated with differences in the inpatient care of hospitalized adults with cancer.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study included hospitalized inpatient adults aged 18 years or older diagnosed with cancer who were identified using data from the 2016 to 2020 National Inpatient Sample. Propensity score matching was used to create a cohort of PEH and housed individuals matched according to age, sex, race and ethnicity, insurance type, cancer diagnosis, number of comorbidities, substance use disorder, severity of illness, year of admission, hospital location, hospital ownership, region, and hospital bed size. Matched pairs were identified using a 1:1 nearest neighbor matching algorithm without replacement, accounting for survey weights. Data were analyzed from August 1, 2022, to April 30, 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Housing status.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The associations of receipt of invasive procedures, systemic therapy, or radiotherapy during hospitalization (primary outcomes) as well as inpatient death, high cost of stay, and discharge against medical advice (AMA) (secondary outcomes) with housing status. Odds ratios and 95% CIs were estimated with multivariable logistic regression, with adjustment for patient, disease, and hospital characteristics of the matched cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The unmatched cohort comprised 13 838 612 individuals (median [IQR] age, 67 [57-76] years; 7 329 473 males [53.0%]) and included 13 793 462 housed individuals (median [IQR] age, 68 [58-77] years) and 45 150 (median [IQR] age, 58 [52-64] years) individuals who were experiencing homelessness after accounting for survey weights. The PEH cohort had a higher prevalence of lung (17.3% vs 14.5%) and upper gastrointestinal (15.2% vs 10.5%) cancers, comorbid substance use disorder (70.2% vs 15.3%), and HIV (5.3% vs 0.5%). Despite having higher rates of moderate or major illness severity (80.1% vs 74.0%) and longer length of stay (≥5 days: 62.2% vs 49.1%), PEH were less likely to receive invasive procedures (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.49-0.56), receive systemic therapy (AOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.63-0.85), or have a higher-than-median cost of stay (AOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65-0.77). Although PEH had lower rates of inpatient death (AOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.92), they were 4 times more likely to be discharged AMA (AOR, 4.29; 95% CI, 3.63-5.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this nationally representative cross-sectional study of hospitalized adults with cancer, disparities in inpatient care of PEH highlight opportunities to promote equitable cancer care in this socioeconomically vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":48661,"journal":{"name":"Jama Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":28.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jama Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.3645","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Cancer is a leading cause of death among people experiencing homelessness (PEH) in the US. Acute care settings are important sources of care for PEH; however, the association of housing status with inpatient care remains understudied, particularly in the context of cancer.

Objective: To assess whether housing status is associated with differences in the inpatient care of hospitalized adults with cancer.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study included hospitalized inpatient adults aged 18 years or older diagnosed with cancer who were identified using data from the 2016 to 2020 National Inpatient Sample. Propensity score matching was used to create a cohort of PEH and housed individuals matched according to age, sex, race and ethnicity, insurance type, cancer diagnosis, number of comorbidities, substance use disorder, severity of illness, year of admission, hospital location, hospital ownership, region, and hospital bed size. Matched pairs were identified using a 1:1 nearest neighbor matching algorithm without replacement, accounting for survey weights. Data were analyzed from August 1, 2022, to April 30, 2024.

Exposure: Housing status.

Main outcomes and measures: The associations of receipt of invasive procedures, systemic therapy, or radiotherapy during hospitalization (primary outcomes) as well as inpatient death, high cost of stay, and discharge against medical advice (AMA) (secondary outcomes) with housing status. Odds ratios and 95% CIs were estimated with multivariable logistic regression, with adjustment for patient, disease, and hospital characteristics of the matched cohort.

Results: The unmatched cohort comprised 13 838 612 individuals (median [IQR] age, 67 [57-76] years; 7 329 473 males [53.0%]) and included 13 793 462 housed individuals (median [IQR] age, 68 [58-77] years) and 45 150 (median [IQR] age, 58 [52-64] years) individuals who were experiencing homelessness after accounting for survey weights. The PEH cohort had a higher prevalence of lung (17.3% vs 14.5%) and upper gastrointestinal (15.2% vs 10.5%) cancers, comorbid substance use disorder (70.2% vs 15.3%), and HIV (5.3% vs 0.5%). Despite having higher rates of moderate or major illness severity (80.1% vs 74.0%) and longer length of stay (≥5 days: 62.2% vs 49.1%), PEH were less likely to receive invasive procedures (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.49-0.56), receive systemic therapy (AOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.63-0.85), or have a higher-than-median cost of stay (AOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65-0.77). Although PEH had lower rates of inpatient death (AOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.92), they were 4 times more likely to be discharged AMA (AOR, 4.29; 95% CI, 3.63-5.06).

Conclusions and relevance: In this nationally representative cross-sectional study of hospitalized adults with cancer, disparities in inpatient care of PEH highlight opportunities to promote equitable cancer care in this socioeconomically vulnerable population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无家可归的癌症患者的住院治疗和疗效。
重要性:癌症是美国无家可归者(PEH)的主要死因。急症护理机构是无家可归者接受护理的重要来源;然而,住房状况与住院护理之间的关系仍未得到充分研究,尤其是在癌症方面:目的:评估住房状况是否与成人癌症患者住院治疗的差异有关:这项横断面研究纳入了年龄在 18 岁或 18 岁以上、确诊患有癌症的住院成人,他们的身份是通过 2016 年至 2020 年全国住院病人样本数据确定的。研究采用倾向得分匹配法,根据年龄、性别、种族和民族、保险类型、癌症诊断、合并症数量、药物使用障碍、病情严重程度、入院年份、医院位置、医院所有权、地区和医院床位规模,创建 PEH 和住院患者队列。在考虑调查权重的情况下,使用 1:1 近邻匹配算法确定匹配对,不进行替换。数据分析时间为 2022 年 8 月 1 日至 2024 年 4 月 30 日。暴露:住房状况:住院期间接受侵入性手术、系统治疗或放射治疗(主要结果)以及住院病人死亡、住院费用高昂和违反医嘱出院(次要结果)与住房状况的关系。通过多变量逻辑回归估算了比值比和 95% CI,并对匹配队列的患者、疾病和医院特征进行了调整:非匹配队列包括 13 838 612 人(中位数[IQR]年龄为 67 [57-76]岁;7 329 473 名男性[53.0%]),其中包括 13 793 462 名居住者(中位数[IQR]年龄为 68 [58-77]岁)和 45 150 名无家可归者(中位数[IQR]年龄为 58 [52-64]岁)。PEH 组群的肺癌(17.3% 对 14.5%)和上消化道癌(15.2% 对 10.5%)患病率、合并药物使用障碍(70.2% 对 15.3%)和 HIV(5.3% 对 0.5%)患病率均较高。尽管 PEH 患中度或重度疾病的比例较高(80.1% vs 74.0%),住院时间较长(≥5 天:62.2% vs 49.1%),但接受侵入性手术(调整后的几率比 [AOR],0.53;95% CI,0.49-0.56)、接受系统治疗(AOR,0.73;95% CI,0.63-0.85)或住院费用高于中位数(AOR,0.71;95% CI,0.65-0.77)的可能性较低。虽然PEH的住院病人死亡率较低(AOR,0.79;95% CI,0.68-0.92),但他们出院时接受AMA的可能性要高出4倍(AOR,4.29;95% CI,3.63-5.06):在这项针对住院成人癌症患者的具有全国代表性的横断面研究中,PEH 住院治疗中的差异凸显了在这一社会经济弱势群体中促进公平癌症治疗的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jama Oncology
Jama Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
37.50
自引率
1.80%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: At JAMA Oncology, our primary goal is to contribute to the advancement of oncology research and enhance patient care. As a leading journal in the field, we strive to publish influential original research, opinions, and reviews that push the boundaries of oncology science. Our mission is to serve as the definitive resource for scientists, clinicians, and trainees in oncology globally. Through our innovative and timely scientific and educational content, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of cancer pathogenesis and the latest treatment advancements to our readers. We are dedicated to effectively disseminating the findings of significant clinical research, major scientific breakthroughs, actionable discoveries, and state-of-the-art treatment pathways to the oncology community. Our ultimate objective is to facilitate the translation of new knowledge into tangible clinical benefits for individuals living with and surviving cancer.
期刊最新文献
Effects of the Oncology Industrial Complex on Academic Cancer Centers. Efficacy of Adding Veliparib to Temozolomide for Patients With MGMT-Methylated Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Errors in Figure 3. Expanding Clinical Trial Accessibility in the Digital Era With Telemedicine. Expanding Clinical Trial Accessibility in the Digital Era With Telemedicine-Reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1