Spherical Aberration Changes in Patients With Early Presbyopia Wearing Aspheric Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses in South Korea.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1097/ICL.0000000000001120
Hyo-Seung Jang, Koon-Ja Lee
{"title":"Spherical Aberration Changes in Patients With Early Presbyopia Wearing Aspheric Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses in South Korea.","authors":"Hyo-Seung Jang, Koon-Ja Lee","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000001120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of wearing center-near (CN) and center-distance (CD) multifocal contact lenses (MFCLs) on spherical aberrations and visual acuity in patients with early presbyopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty participants with early presbyopia wore CN-MFCLs and CD-MFCLs for 1 week. The average corrected refractive power was -2.65±1.67 D. Spherical aberration was measured using an auto-refractor after 1 week of lens use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in overall visual acuity was observed when using either lens. Participants favored CD-MFCLs for distance vision and CN-MFCLs for near vision. This study highlighted variations in aberration and satisfaction based on age, refractive errors, and individual responses. Patients with positive spherical aberrations tended to benefit from CN-MFCLs, which improved both distance and near vision, although additional correction was required for clear distance vision. Patients with early presbyopia generally preferred CN-MFCLs when positive aberration was prevalent, whereas those with negative aberration reported greater satisfaction with distance vision when wearing CD-MFCLs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirmed that wearing MFCLs leads to changes in spherical aberration and visual acuity in patients with early presbyopia, particularly when positive aberration prevails. Future research should investigate these effects across different stages of presbyopia.</p>","PeriodicalId":50457,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"475-481"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000001120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of wearing center-near (CN) and center-distance (CD) multifocal contact lenses (MFCLs) on spherical aberrations and visual acuity in patients with early presbyopia.

Methods: Fifty participants with early presbyopia wore CN-MFCLs and CD-MFCLs for 1 week. The average corrected refractive power was -2.65±1.67 D. Spherical aberration was measured using an auto-refractor after 1 week of lens use.

Results: No significant difference in overall visual acuity was observed when using either lens. Participants favored CD-MFCLs for distance vision and CN-MFCLs for near vision. This study highlighted variations in aberration and satisfaction based on age, refractive errors, and individual responses. Patients with positive spherical aberrations tended to benefit from CN-MFCLs, which improved both distance and near vision, although additional correction was required for clear distance vision. Patients with early presbyopia generally preferred CN-MFCLs when positive aberration was prevalent, whereas those with negative aberration reported greater satisfaction with distance vision when wearing CD-MFCLs.

Conclusions: This study confirmed that wearing MFCLs leads to changes in spherical aberration and visual acuity in patients with early presbyopia, particularly when positive aberration prevails. Future research should investigate these effects across different stages of presbyopia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国配戴非球面多焦点软性隐形眼镜的早期老花患者的球差变化。
研究目的本研究旨在评估配戴中心-近距离(CN)和中心-远距离(CD)多焦点隐形眼镜(MFCLs)对早期老花患者球差和视力的影响:50 名早期老花眼患者分别配戴 CN-MFCL 和 CD-MFCL 1 周。戴镜 1 周后,使用自动屈光仪测量球差:结果:使用这两种镜片时,总体视力无明显差异。结果:使用这两种镜片时,总体视力没有明显差异。参与者在远距离视力方面偏爱 CD-MFCL 镜片,在近距离视力方面偏爱 CN-MFCL 镜片。这项研究强调了基于年龄、屈光不正和个人反应的像差和满意度差异。正球面像差患者倾向于从 CN-MFCLs 中获益,因为它能改善远近视力,但要获得清晰的远距离视力还需要额外的矫正。早期老花眼患者在正像差普遍存在的情况下,一般更倾向于佩戴 CN-MFCLs 镜片,而负像差患者则对佩戴 CD-MFCLs 镜片时的远距离视力更满意:本研究证实,佩戴 MFCLs 会导致早期老花眼患者的球面像差和视力发生变化,尤其是在正像差普遍存在的情况下。未来的研究应针对不同阶段的老花眼调查这些影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye & Contact Lens: Science and Clinical Practice is the official journal of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists (CLAO), an international educational association for anterior segment research and clinical practice of interest to ophthalmologists, optometrists, and other vision care providers and researchers. Focusing especially on contact lenses, it also covers dry eye disease, MGD, infections, toxicity of drops and contact lens care solutions, topography, cornea surgery and post-operative care, optics, refractive surgery and corneal stability (eg, UV cross-linking). Peer-reviewed and published six times annually, it is a highly respected scientific journal in its field.
期刊最新文献
Contact Lens Regulation: Where Have We Been, Where are We Going? Corneal Refractive Surgery Considerations in Patients With History of Orthokeratology. Evaluation of Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive Glue Application Outcomes in Corneal Thinning and Perforation. Spotlight on Amniotic Membrane Extract Eye Drops: A Review of the Literature. Corneal Clarity and Tomographic Patterns in Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome: A Severity-Based Investigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1