The Use of Tranexamic Acid for Primary Prophylaxis of Heterotopic Ossification Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.055
Andrea H Johnson, Jane C Brennan, Parimal Rana, Justin J Turcotte, Paul J King
{"title":"The Use of Tranexamic Acid for Primary Prophylaxis of Heterotopic Ossification Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.","authors":"Andrea H Johnson, Jane C Brennan, Parimal Rana, Justin J Turcotte, Paul J King","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a relatively common complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and can range from a radiographic observation only to severely disabling and requiring revision surgery. Prophylaxis is recommended for high-risk patients, though the ideal method and targeted population are open to debate. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a medication increasingly being used to reduce blood loss associated with orthopaedic surgeries, including THA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 357 patients undergoing THA from November 2020 through December 2023 was conducted. The patients were grouped based on whether they received intravenous TXA perioperatively or not, and their propensity score matched 2:1 TXA to no TXA on age, body mass index, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and perioperative celecoxib use. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, the only significant differences between groups were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores and preoperative celecoxib use between groups, as the TXA group had fewer patients who had an ASA of 3 or more (38.9 versus 58.5%, P < 0.001) and more patients who had taken celecoxib preoperatively (16.3 versus 5.9%, P = 0.010). Perioperatively, patients were more likely to undergo THA using the anterior approach (74.5 versus 57.6%, P = 0.002) and were more likely to receive postoperative celecoxib prescriptions (44.8 versus 31.4%, P = 0.021), but there was no difference in other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) usage postoperatively. Postoperatively, patients who received TXA had a lower rate of HO on the last postoperative x-ray (20.1 versus 33.9%, P = 0.007). Multivariable logistic regression, to assess predictors of HO, found that patients who had TXA were 42% less likely to have visible HO (OR [odds ratio] = 0.58, P = 0.047), while holding surgical approach, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, preoperative and postoperative celecoxib use, and postoperative other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use constant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of TXA in patients undergoing primary THA results in a decreased likelihood ofHO formation on postoperative x-rays.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a relatively common complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and can range from a radiographic observation only to severely disabling and requiring revision surgery. Prophylaxis is recommended for high-risk patients, though the ideal method and targeted population are open to debate. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a medication increasingly being used to reduce blood loss associated with orthopaedic surgeries, including THA.

Methods: A retrospective review of 357 patients undergoing THA from November 2020 through December 2023 was conducted. The patients were grouped based on whether they received intravenous TXA perioperatively or not, and their propensity score matched 2:1 TXA to no TXA on age, body mass index, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and perioperative celecoxib use. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results: After propensity score matching, the only significant differences between groups were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores and preoperative celecoxib use between groups, as the TXA group had fewer patients who had an ASA of 3 or more (38.9 versus 58.5%, P < 0.001) and more patients who had taken celecoxib preoperatively (16.3 versus 5.9%, P = 0.010). Perioperatively, patients were more likely to undergo THA using the anterior approach (74.5 versus 57.6%, P = 0.002) and were more likely to receive postoperative celecoxib prescriptions (44.8 versus 31.4%, P = 0.021), but there was no difference in other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) usage postoperatively. Postoperatively, patients who received TXA had a lower rate of HO on the last postoperative x-ray (20.1 versus 33.9%, P = 0.007). Multivariable logistic regression, to assess predictors of HO, found that patients who had TXA were 42% less likely to have visible HO (OR [odds ratio] = 0.58, P = 0.047), while holding surgical approach, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, preoperative and postoperative celecoxib use, and postoperative other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use constant.

Conclusions: The use of TXA in patients undergoing primary THA results in a decreased likelihood ofHO formation on postoperative x-rays.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用氨甲环酸对全髋关节置换术后异位骨化进行一级预防
导言:异位骨化(HO)是全髋关节置换术(THA)后一种较为常见的并发症,轻则仅需放射学观察,重则致残并需要进行翻修手术。建议对高危患者采取预防措施,但理想的方法和目标人群还有待商榷。氨甲环酸(TXA)是一种越来越多用于减少骨科手术(包括 THA)失血的药物:对 2020 年 11 月至 2023 年 12 月期间接受 THA 手术的 357 名患者进行了回顾性研究。根据患者是否在围手术期接受静脉注射 TXA 进行分组,并根据患者的年龄、体重指数、性别、Charlson 综合征指数和围手术期塞来昔布的使用情况,以 2:1 的倾向得分匹配 TXA 与无 TXA。进行了单变量和多变量分析:经过倾向评分匹配后,各组之间唯一显著的差异是美国麻醉医师协会评分和术前使用塞来昔布的情况,因为TXA组中ASA为3级或以上的患者较少(38.9%对58.5%,P<0.001),术前服用塞来昔布的患者较多(16.3%对5.9%,P=0.010)。围手术期,患者更倾向于使用前路进行THA(74.5%对57.6%,P = 0.002),术后更倾向于接受塞来昔布处方(44.8%对31.4%,P = 0.021),但术后使用其他非甾体抗炎药的情况没有差异。术后,接受TXA治疗的患者在术后最后一次X光检查中出现异位骨化的比例较低(20.1%对33.9%,P = 0.007)。评估HO预测因素的多变量逻辑回归发现,在手术方式、ASA评分、术前和术后塞来昔布使用情况以及术后其他非甾体抗炎药使用情况保持不变的情况下,使用氨甲环酸的患者出现明显HO的可能性降低了42%(OR[几率比]=0.58,P=0.047):结论:在接受初级全髋关节置换术的患者中使用氨甲环酸可降低术后X光片上异位骨化形成的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
期刊最新文献
Patient-Level Factors, Outcomes, and Costs Associated with Facility Transfer following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Database Study. What are the Indications for Hinged Implant in Revision Total Knee Replacement? Does Body Mass Index Affect the Success of Two-Stage Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection? Moving Beyond Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and Bacteremia: Are Modern Critical Care Calculators Useful in Predicting Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention Treatment Outcomes in Periprosthetic Joint Infection? Data-Driven Approach to Development of a Risk Score for Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Total Joint Arthroplasty Using Electronic Health Records.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1