Microbiological Differences Among Age Groups in Patients Diagnosed With Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Database Analysis of 2,392 Patients.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00214
Seper Ekhtiari, Franka Mai, Taner Karlidag, Thorsten Gehrke, Mustafa Citak
{"title":"Microbiological Differences Among Age Groups in Patients Diagnosed With Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Database Analysis of 2,392 Patients.","authors":"Seper Ekhtiari, Franka Mai, Taner Karlidag, Thorsten Gehrke, Mustafa Citak","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) poses substantial economic and quality-of-life challenges. With the rising incidence of hip and knee arthritis globally, understanding the changing profile of PJIs across different age groups becomes crucial. While various studies have explored risk factors, the influence of age on PJI remains debated, with potential bimodal relationships. This study aims to investigate the causative organisms of PJIs in patients of different age groups undergoing TJA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted as a retrospective cohort study at a high-volume PJI referral center, the study adhered to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Data spanned from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2022, including patients with documented PJI undergoing revision TJA. Patients were categorized into age quintiles, and outcomes analyzed included causative organisms, difficult-to-treat infections, antimicrobial resistance, and Gram stain characteristics. Statistical analyses used descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and sensitivity analyses for hip and knee patients separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study comprised 2,392 patients, with 60.7% undergoing hip arthroplasty and 39.3% undergoing knee arthroplasty. 1,080 women (45.2%) and 1,312 men (54.8%) were included. Older patients were markedly more likely to have gram-negative infections and atypical infections. Patients in the youngest age group had the lowest rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Results were similar between hip and knee PJIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study reveals age-related variations in the characteristics of PJIs after TJA, emphasizing higher risks of atypical and resistant infections in older patients. These findings underscore the importance of tailored preventive measures and potential considerations for adjunctive or prolonged antibiotic therapies, especially in the elderly population. Recognizing the unique infection patterns in older patients may inform better prevention and treatment strategies, with implications for enhanced patient care and outcomes. Future directions should focus on patient-specific strategies for preventing and treating PJIs, particularly in high-risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00214","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) poses substantial economic and quality-of-life challenges. With the rising incidence of hip and knee arthritis globally, understanding the changing profile of PJIs across different age groups becomes crucial. While various studies have explored risk factors, the influence of age on PJI remains debated, with potential bimodal relationships. This study aims to investigate the causative organisms of PJIs in patients of different age groups undergoing TJA.

Methods: Conducted as a retrospective cohort study at a high-volume PJI referral center, the study adhered to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Data spanned from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2022, including patients with documented PJI undergoing revision TJA. Patients were categorized into age quintiles, and outcomes analyzed included causative organisms, difficult-to-treat infections, antimicrobial resistance, and Gram stain characteristics. Statistical analyses used descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and sensitivity analyses for hip and knee patients separately.

Results: The study comprised 2,392 patients, with 60.7% undergoing hip arthroplasty and 39.3% undergoing knee arthroplasty. 1,080 women (45.2%) and 1,312 men (54.8%) were included. Older patients were markedly more likely to have gram-negative infections and atypical infections. Patients in the youngest age group had the lowest rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Results were similar between hip and knee PJIs.

Conclusions: The study reveals age-related variations in the characteristics of PJIs after TJA, emphasizing higher risks of atypical and resistant infections in older patients. These findings underscore the importance of tailored preventive measures and potential considerations for adjunctive or prolonged antibiotic therapies, especially in the elderly population. Recognizing the unique infection patterns in older patients may inform better prevention and treatment strategies, with implications for enhanced patient care and outcomes. Future directions should focus on patient-specific strategies for preventing and treating PJIs, particularly in high-risk populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同年龄段假体周围关节感染患者的微生物学差异:2392 例患者的数据库分析。
导言:全关节置换术(TJA)后的假体周围关节感染(PJI)给经济和生活质量带来了巨大挑战。随着全球髋关节和膝关节炎发病率的上升,了解不同年龄组 PJI 的变化情况变得至关重要。虽然已有多项研究探讨了风险因素,但年龄对 PJI 的影响仍存在争议,可能存在双峰关系。本研究旨在调查接受 TJA 手术的不同年龄组患者中 PJI 的致病菌:该研究是在一个高容量 PJI 转诊中心进行的一项回顾性队列研究,遵循了《加强流行病学中观察性研究的报告》指南。数据时间跨度为2001年1月1日至2022年12月31日,包括接受翻修TJA的有记录的PJI患者。患者年龄分为五等分,分析结果包括致病菌、难治性感染、抗菌素耐药性和革兰氏染色特征。统计分析采用了描述性统计、卡方检验,并分别对髋关节和膝关节患者进行了敏感性分析:这项研究包括 2392 名患者,其中 60.7% 接受髋关节置换术,39.3% 接受膝关节置换术。其中有 1080 名女性(45.2%)和 1312 名男性(54.8%)。老年患者明显更容易发生革兰氏阴性菌感染和非典型感染。最年轻年龄组患者的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染率最低。髋关节和膝关节PJI的结果相似:该研究揭示了 TJA 术后 PJIs 特征中与年龄相关的变化,强调了老年患者发生非典型感染和耐药感染的风险较高。这些发现强调了针对性预防措施的重要性,以及辅助或长期抗生素疗法的潜在考虑因素,尤其是在老年人群中。认识到老年患者的独特感染模式可以为更好的预防和治疗策略提供依据,从而改善患者护理和治疗效果。未来的发展方向应侧重于针对特定患者的 PJI 预防和治疗策略,尤其是在高危人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the Influence of Single Payer Health Insurance on Socioeconomic Disparities in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Utilization: A Transnational Analysis. Patellofemoral Instability Part II: Surgical Treatment. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline Summary Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hip. Femoral Head Fractures: Evaluation, Management, and Outcomes. Trends in Preoperative Outcome Measures From 2013 to 2021 in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1