Dirk H J Verhoeven, Olga Benjamin-van Aalst, Ted Klok, Wouter W de Weger, Mijke Breukels, Tom Hendriks, Roy Gerth van Wijk, Hans de Groot
{"title":"Successful introduction of peanut in sensitized infants with reported reactions at home.","authors":"Dirk H J Verhoeven, Olga Benjamin-van Aalst, Ted Klok, Wouter W de Weger, Mijke Breukels, Tom Hendriks, Roy Gerth van Wijk, Hans de Groot","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2024.08.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Previous studies have shown efficacy of early introduction of peanut to prevent peanut allergy. It is currently unknown which diagnostic pathway is optimal after parental-reported reactions to peanut at home after early introduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PeanutNL cohort study included high-risk infants that were referred for early introduction of peanut. A subgroup of 186 infants with reactions to peanut at home underwent peanut skin prick tests and a supervised open oral food challenge (OFC) at a median age of 8 months. After a negative OFC, peanut was introduced at home.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sensitization to peanut was detected in 69% of 186 infants, of which 80% had > 4mm wheals in skin prick tests. An OFC with a cumulative dose of 4.4 gr peanut protein was performed in 163 infants with Sampson severity score grade I-III reactions at home; 120 challenges were negative. Peanut was subsequently introduced at home in infants with a negative challenge outcome. After 6 months, 96% were still eating peanut and 81% ate single portions of 3.0 gr peanut protein. One patient was considered to be peanut allergic after reintroduction of peanut at home.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data show that 65% of infants with reported reactions to peanut at home have negative OFCs. In those children, peanut could be introduced safely and 96% were able to consume peanut regularly without reactions. Challenging infants under 12 months of age prevents the misdiagnosis of peanut allergy, and enables safe continued exposure to peanut and the induction of long-term tolerance.</p>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.08.047","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective: Previous studies have shown efficacy of early introduction of peanut to prevent peanut allergy. It is currently unknown which diagnostic pathway is optimal after parental-reported reactions to peanut at home after early introduction.
Methods: The PeanutNL cohort study included high-risk infants that were referred for early introduction of peanut. A subgroup of 186 infants with reactions to peanut at home underwent peanut skin prick tests and a supervised open oral food challenge (OFC) at a median age of 8 months. After a negative OFC, peanut was introduced at home.
Results: Sensitization to peanut was detected in 69% of 186 infants, of which 80% had > 4mm wheals in skin prick tests. An OFC with a cumulative dose of 4.4 gr peanut protein was performed in 163 infants with Sampson severity score grade I-III reactions at home; 120 challenges were negative. Peanut was subsequently introduced at home in infants with a negative challenge outcome. After 6 months, 96% were still eating peanut and 81% ate single portions of 3.0 gr peanut protein. One patient was considered to be peanut allergic after reintroduction of peanut at home.
Conclusion: These data show that 65% of infants with reported reactions to peanut at home have negative OFCs. In those children, peanut could be introduced safely and 96% were able to consume peanut regularly without reactions. Challenging infants under 12 months of age prevents the misdiagnosis of peanut allergy, and enables safe continued exposure to peanut and the induction of long-term tolerance.
期刊介绍：
JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases.
This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders.
The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
